Comparison of the techniques for isolating immunoassay-suitable proteins from heterogeneous fecal samples.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Analytical biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2024.115748
Subramaniam-Betty Sheila Devan, Rosli Ramli, Salah Abdalrazak Alshehade, Sharoen Yu Ming Lim, Noorhidayah Mamat
{"title":"Comparison of the techniques for isolating immunoassay-suitable proteins from heterogeneous fecal samples.","authors":"Subramaniam-Betty Sheila Devan, Rosli Ramli, Salah Abdalrazak Alshehade, Sharoen Yu Ming Lim, Noorhidayah Mamat","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2024.115748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immunoassays could provide valuable insights into disease biomarkers and gut health by measuring fecal proteins. However, reliably isolating intact proteins from feces is challenging due to its heterogeneous and variable composition. This paper aims to review and compare different methods for extracting proteins from fecal samples to make them suitable for immunoassay analysis. Mechanical homogenization helps release proteins by disrupting solids, while protease inhibitors preserve protein integrity. Detergents like SDS solubilize proteins by disrupting hydrophobic interactions. Organic solvents such as acetone precipitate proteins and remove contaminants. Thermal treatment denatures proteases. Immunocapture uses antibodies to purify target proteins away from interference selectively. Commercial kits contain optimized buffers but may be cost-prohibitive. Combining mechanical, chemical, and immunological techniques synergistically integrates their advantages, improving the recovery of native proteins with reduced matrix effects. While all methods have merits, tailored protocols integrating multiple mechanisms appear most promising for extracting immunoassay-suitable fecal proteins. Further optimization and standardization of such combination approaches matched to proteins and assays of interest helps expand noninvasive fecal proteome analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"115748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2024.115748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immunoassays could provide valuable insights into disease biomarkers and gut health by measuring fecal proteins. However, reliably isolating intact proteins from feces is challenging due to its heterogeneous and variable composition. This paper aims to review and compare different methods for extracting proteins from fecal samples to make them suitable for immunoassay analysis. Mechanical homogenization helps release proteins by disrupting solids, while protease inhibitors preserve protein integrity. Detergents like SDS solubilize proteins by disrupting hydrophobic interactions. Organic solvents such as acetone precipitate proteins and remove contaminants. Thermal treatment denatures proteases. Immunocapture uses antibodies to purify target proteins away from interference selectively. Commercial kits contain optimized buffers but may be cost-prohibitive. Combining mechanical, chemical, and immunological techniques synergistically integrates their advantages, improving the recovery of native proteins with reduced matrix effects. While all methods have merits, tailored protocols integrating multiple mechanisms appear most promising for extracting immunoassay-suitable fecal proteins. Further optimization and standardization of such combination approaches matched to proteins and assays of interest helps expand noninvasive fecal proteome analysis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Analytical biochemistry
Analytical biochemistry 生物-分析化学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field. The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology. The journal has been particularly active in: -Analytical techniques for biological molecules- Aptamer selection and utilization- Biosensors- Chromatography- Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis- Electrochemical methods- Electrophoresis- Enzyme characterization methods- Immunological approaches- Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids- Metabolomics- Nano level techniques- Optical spectroscopy in all its forms. The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.
期刊最新文献
Enrichment and MALDI-TOF-MS/MS Analysis of Phosphatidylinositol Bisphosphates in Brain Tissue. In Silico Selection against Progesterone Receptor DNA-Binding Domain and other members of steroid hormone receptors. Nanoparticle-assisted plasmonic sensors: recent developments in clinical applications. Esterase-2 mutant-based nanostructured amperometric biosensors for the selective determination of paraoxon (Neurotoxin). Norovirus detection technologies: From conventional methods to innovative biosensors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1