Long-term reoperation risk of thoracic to pelvis instrumentation for spinal deformity: a longitudinal study of 7,062 patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08566-2
Paal K Nilssen, Nakul Narendran, David L Skaggs, Corey T Walker, Christopher M Mikhail, Edward Nomoto, Alexander Tuchman
{"title":"Long-term reoperation risk of thoracic to pelvis instrumentation for spinal deformity: a longitudinal study of 7,062 patients.","authors":"Paal K Nilssen, Nakul Narendran, David L Skaggs, Corey T Walker, Christopher M Mikhail, Edward Nomoto, Alexander Tuchman","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08566-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To perform a large-scale assessment of reoperation risk among spine deformity patients undergoing thoracic to pelvis surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PearlDiver database was queried for spinal deformity patients (scoliosis, kyphosis, spondylolisthesis, sagittal plane deformity) undergoing at minimum, a T12-pelvis operation (2010-2020). CPT codes identified lumbar arthrodesis procedures that included pelvic fixation and ≥ 7 levels of posterior instrumentation on the same day. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Reoperations included subsequent arthrodesis, decompression, osteotomy, device insertion, and pelvic fixation procedures. Multivariable regression analysis described associations between variables and reoperation risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7,062 patients met criteria. Overall reoperation rate was 23.2%. Reoperation rate at 2- and 5-year was 16.9% and 22.1% respectively. 10-year reoperation-free probability was 73.7% (95% CI: 72.4-74.9%). Multivariable analysis revealed higher reoperation risk for patients with kyphosis and ≥ 13 levels of posterior instrumentation. Patients who received interbody cages had a lower reoperation risk. No association was found between the presence or absence of osteotomy procedures and reoperation risk. Lastly, linear regression analyses revealed no significant relationship between age or ECI and risk for subsequent operations did not independently influence reoperation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study, representing a real-world cohort of over six times the largest current prospective data set, found a 2-year reoperation rate of 17%, similar to previous studies, suggesting study group findings are applicable to a broader population. Preoperative kyphosis and ≥ 13 levels of posterior instrumentation was associated with higher reoperation risk, while the use of interbody cages was protective. Age, medical comorbidities, and osteotomies did not predict reoperations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1034-1041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08566-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a large-scale assessment of reoperation risk among spine deformity patients undergoing thoracic to pelvis surgery.

Methods: The PearlDiver database was queried for spinal deformity patients (scoliosis, kyphosis, spondylolisthesis, sagittal plane deformity) undergoing at minimum, a T12-pelvis operation (2010-2020). CPT codes identified lumbar arthrodesis procedures that included pelvic fixation and ≥ 7 levels of posterior instrumentation on the same day. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Reoperations included subsequent arthrodesis, decompression, osteotomy, device insertion, and pelvic fixation procedures. Multivariable regression analysis described associations between variables and reoperation risk.

Results: 7,062 patients met criteria. Overall reoperation rate was 23.2%. Reoperation rate at 2- and 5-year was 16.9% and 22.1% respectively. 10-year reoperation-free probability was 73.7% (95% CI: 72.4-74.9%). Multivariable analysis revealed higher reoperation risk for patients with kyphosis and ≥ 13 levels of posterior instrumentation. Patients who received interbody cages had a lower reoperation risk. No association was found between the presence or absence of osteotomy procedures and reoperation risk. Lastly, linear regression analyses revealed no significant relationship between age or ECI and risk for subsequent operations did not independently influence reoperation.

Conclusions: This study, representing a real-world cohort of over six times the largest current prospective data set, found a 2-year reoperation rate of 17%, similar to previous studies, suggesting study group findings are applicable to a broader population. Preoperative kyphosis and ≥ 13 levels of posterior instrumentation was associated with higher reoperation risk, while the use of interbody cages was protective. Age, medical comorbidities, and osteotomies did not predict reoperations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸骨盆内固定治疗脊柱畸形的长期再手术风险:一项7062例患者的纵向研究
目的:对接受胸椎至骨盆手术的脊柱畸形患者的再手术风险进行大规模评估:在PearlDiver数据库中查询了至少接受过T12-骨盆手术(2010-2020年)的脊柱畸形患者(脊柱侧弯、椎体后凸、脊柱滑脱、矢状面畸形)。CPT代码确定了腰椎关节置换手术,其中包括骨盆固定和同一天进行的≥7个层次的后路器械固定。最少随访 2 年。再手术包括后续的关节固定术、减压术、截骨术、器械插入术和骨盆固定术。多变量回归分析描述了变量与再手术风险之间的关联:结果:7062 名患者符合标准。总体再手术率为 23.2%。2年和5年的再手术率分别为16.9%和22.1%。10年无再手术概率为73.7%(95% CI:72.4-74.9%)。多变量分析显示,椎体后凸和后方器械≥13级的患者再手术风险更高。接受椎间笼治疗的患者再手术风险较低。有无截骨手术与再手术风险之间没有关联。最后,线性回归分析表明,年龄或ECI与再次手术风险之间没有显著关系:这项研究代表了一个真实世界的队列,其规模是目前最大的前瞻性数据集的六倍多,研究发现2年再手术率为17%,与之前的研究结果相似,这表明研究小组的发现适用于更广泛的人群。术前椎体后凸和≥13级后路器械与较高的再手术风险相关,而使用椎间笼则具有保护作用。年龄、合并症和截骨术并不能预测再手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Thoracic corpectomy and vertebral body reconstruction (TCVBR): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mortality following surgical management of traumatic sub-axial cervical spine injuries in a South African tertiary centre. Agreement of CT versus MRI in reinvestigation of patients operated for lumbar spinal stenosis. a comparison of surgically and non-surgically treated levels. Acute thoracolumbar burst fractures (AO types A3/A4) with and without concomitant posterior ligamentous complex injury: treatment outcomes in surgically and nonsurgically managed patients. A multi-center prospective study. Factors associated with favorable outcomes of floating fusion or lumbosacral spinal fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of the incidence of mechanical complications from a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1