{"title":"Three Developments Related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56.","authors":"William Evans","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Three topics related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactivity in the Workplace, are discussed. First, due to the omission of consideration of the activity's half-life in the standard's continuous particulate air monitor (CPAM) quantitative method, it is possible for concentration estimates produced by that calculation to be underestimated. Second, the concentration estimate found in air grab sampling, as discussed in the standard, is not, as claimed, an average unless the activity is \"long-lived\" (negligible decay during sampling). It is nonetheless possible for this calculation to produce a concentration estimate that is not significantly different from the average, depending on both the half-life of the activity and the sampling time. Third, the issue of when to change the filter for the CPAM method is addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract: Three topics related to ANSI/HPS Standard N13.56, Sampling and Monitoring Releases of Airborne Radioactivity in the Workplace, are discussed. First, due to the omission of consideration of the activity's half-life in the standard's continuous particulate air monitor (CPAM) quantitative method, it is possible for concentration estimates produced by that calculation to be underestimated. Second, the concentration estimate found in air grab sampling, as discussed in the standard, is not, as claimed, an average unless the activity is "long-lived" (negligible decay during sampling). It is nonetheless possible for this calculation to produce a concentration estimate that is not significantly different from the average, depending on both the half-life of the activity and the sampling time. Third, the issue of when to change the filter for the CPAM method is addressed.
期刊介绍：
Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
