Effect of National Accreditation Board for Hospital-Recommended Trainings on Patient Care Standards: A Comparative Study Based on the National Quality Assurance Standards Guidelines in a Tertiary Health-care Institute.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian journal of public health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI:10.4103/ijph.ijph_1262_23
Vikram Singh, Arvind Kumar Singh, Manish Raj Kulshrestha, Dimpi Singh, Adeeba Khan, Mridu Singh
{"title":"Effect of National Accreditation Board for Hospital-Recommended Trainings on Patient Care Standards: A Comparative Study Based on the National Quality Assurance Standards Guidelines in a Tertiary Health-care Institute.","authors":"Vikram Singh, Arvind Kumar Singh, Manish Raj Kulshrestha, Dimpi Singh, Adeeba Khan, Mridu Singh","doi":"10.4103/ijph.ijph_1262_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Quality Assurance Standards (NQAS) have been developed keeping in specific requirements for public health facilities as well global best practices. Standards are primarily meant for providers to assess their quality for improvement through predefined standards and to bring up their facilities for certification.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To study the effect of National Accreditation Board for Hospitals (NABH)-recommended training on patient care standards based on NQAS guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research was conducted at a tertiary-level teaching institute and medical care center in North India. The institute has multiple blocks, few have undergone training for NABH standards, and few have not due to administrative reasons. Only the NABH-trained blocks underwent accreditation process through NABH and provided an opportunity to study whether there is a difference in patient care standards between NABH-trained staff and nontrained staff. It was a checklist-based observational study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The evaluation covered seven key areas in intensive care unit (ICU) and wards in both NABH-trained and nontrained hospital blocks: patient rights, inputs, support services, clinical services, infection control, quality management, and outcome. The compliance percentage of ICU and wards was measured for NABH-trained and nontrained hospital blocks. NABH-trained blocks in both areas showed better compliance adhering to standards as compared to nontrained blocks for all seven key areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study findings indicate that NABH-recommended training showed positive impact on patient care standards as per the NQAS guidelines. The NABH-trained hospital block exhibited superior compliance with various domains including patient rights, inputs, support services, clinical services, infection control, and quality management.</p>","PeriodicalId":13298,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of public health","volume":"68 4","pages":"502-506"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijph.ijph_1262_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Quality Assurance Standards (NQAS) have been developed keeping in specific requirements for public health facilities as well global best practices. Standards are primarily meant for providers to assess their quality for improvement through predefined standards and to bring up their facilities for certification.

Objectives: To study the effect of National Accreditation Board for Hospitals (NABH)-recommended training on patient care standards based on NQAS guidelines.

Materials and methods: The research was conducted at a tertiary-level teaching institute and medical care center in North India. The institute has multiple blocks, few have undergone training for NABH standards, and few have not due to administrative reasons. Only the NABH-trained blocks underwent accreditation process through NABH and provided an opportunity to study whether there is a difference in patient care standards between NABH-trained staff and nontrained staff. It was a checklist-based observational study.

Results: The evaluation covered seven key areas in intensive care unit (ICU) and wards in both NABH-trained and nontrained hospital blocks: patient rights, inputs, support services, clinical services, infection control, quality management, and outcome. The compliance percentage of ICU and wards was measured for NABH-trained and nontrained hospital blocks. NABH-trained blocks in both areas showed better compliance adhering to standards as compared to nontrained blocks for all seven key areas.

Conclusion: The study findings indicate that NABH-recommended training showed positive impact on patient care standards as per the NQAS guidelines. The NABH-trained hospital block exhibited superior compliance with various domains including patient rights, inputs, support services, clinical services, infection control, and quality management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家医院评审委员会推荐的培训对患者护理标准的影响:基于国家质量保证标准指南的三级医疗保健机构比较研究。
背景:国家质量保证标准(NQAS)是根据公共卫生设施的具体要求以及全球最佳做法制定的。标准主要是为了让供应商通过预先确定的标准来评估他们的质量以改进,并提出他们的设施进行认证。目的:研究国家医院认可委员会(NABH)推荐的基于NQAS指南的患者护理标准培训的效果。材料和方法:本研究在印度北部的一所三级教学机构和医疗保健中心进行。该研究所有多个部门,很少有部门接受过NABH标准的培训,也有少数部门由于行政原因没有接受过培训。只有NABH培训过的街区通过NABH进行了认证,并提供了一个机会来研究NABH培训过的员工和未培训过的员工之间的患者护理标准是否存在差异。这是一项基于检查表的观察性研究。结果:评估涵盖了在nabh培训和非nabh培训的医院区重症监护病房(ICU)和病房的七个关键领域:患者权利、投入、支持服务、临床服务、感染控制、质量管理和结果。对接受nabh培训和未接受nabh培训的医院街区的ICU和病房的依从率进行测量。与未经nabh培训的区块相比,这两个领域的区块在所有七个关键领域都表现出更好的合规性。结论:研究结果表明,nabh推荐的培训对NQAS指南的患者护理标准有积极的影响。nabh培训的医院区在患者权利、投入、支持服务、临床服务、感染控制和质量管理等各个领域都表现出了卓越的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of public health
Indian journal of public health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Public Health is a peer-reviewed international journal published Quarterly by the Indian Public Health Association. It is indexed / abstracted by the major international indexing systems like Index Medicus/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PUBMED, etc. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles. The Indian Journal of Public Health publishes articles of authors from India and abroad with special emphasis on original research findings that are relevant for developing country perspectives including India. The journal considers publication of articles as original article, review article, special article, brief research article, CME / Education forum, commentary, letters to editor, case series reports, etc. The journal covers population based studies, impact assessment, monitoring and evaluation, systematic review, meta-analysis, clinic-social studies etc., related to any domain and discipline of public health, specially relevant to national priorities, including ethical and social issues. Articles aligned with national health issues and policy implications are prefered.
期刊最新文献
Anthropometric Indices as a Predictive Screening Tool for Hypertension among Young Indian Adults. An Assessment of Zimbabwe's Response Level to Coronavirus Pandemic: A Case of Harare Metropolitan Province. Barriers to Uptake of Cataract Surgery in Central Chhattisgarh. Abhaya's Cries are Unanswered and Keep Echoing Every Day. Epidemiological Data of Postcricoid Cancers from a Tertiary Cancer Hospital: First Report from Northern Andhra Pradesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1