Laser and light-based treatments for port-wine birthmarks – a systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1111/ddg.15612
Lynhda Nguyen, Christina Sorbe, Gerhard Schoen, Stefan W. Schneider, Katharina Herberger
{"title":"Laser and light-based treatments for port-wine birthmarks – a systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Lynhda Nguyen,&nbsp;Christina Sorbe,&nbsp;Gerhard Schoen,&nbsp;Stefan W. Schneider,&nbsp;Katharina Herberger","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Port-wine birthmarks (PWB) are common vascular malformations in infants. Despite various laser and light-based treatments, comparative data on their effectiveness is limited. This study compares different treatments for PWB using a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ongoing studies up to November 2023: Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, investigator-assessed reduction in redness, and long-term adverse events (AEs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool.</p><p>We identified 27 RCTs for qualitative analysis and twelve RCTs for the NMA, covering 1033 observations, 19 treatments, and three sub-networks. Seven studies reported on patient satisfaction. Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy was more effective in lesion clearance than PDL but had the highest risk of AEs. The 755 nm alexandrite laser and the combination of 595 nm PDL + 1064 nm Nd:YAG also showed high AE risks. Treatment discontinuation rates due to AEs did not significantly differ. Most studies had unclear bias risks, mostly owing to insufficient reporting.</p><p>This study is the first NMA comparing laser- and light-based therapies for PWB. Further well-designed studies are warranted to determine optimal methods and patient-influencing factors for individualized treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":"23 3","pages":"293-301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ddg.15612","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddg.15612","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Port-wine birthmarks (PWB) are common vascular malformations in infants. Despite various laser and light-based treatments, comparative data on their effectiveness is limited. This study compares different treatments for PWB using a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ongoing studies up to November 2023: Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction, investigator-assessed reduction in redness, and long-term adverse events (AEs). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool.

We identified 27 RCTs for qualitative analysis and twelve RCTs for the NMA, covering 1033 observations, 19 treatments, and three sub-networks. Seven studies reported on patient satisfaction. Hemoporfin-mediated photodynamic therapy was more effective in lesion clearance than PDL but had the highest risk of AEs. The 755 nm alexandrite laser and the combination of 595 nm PDL + 1064 nm Nd:YAG also showed high AE risks. Treatment discontinuation rates due to AEs did not significantly differ. Most studies had unclear bias risks, mostly owing to insufficient reporting.

This study is the first NMA comparing laser- and light-based therapies for PWB. Further well-designed studies are warranted to determine optimal methods and patient-influencing factors for individualized treatments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光和光治疗葡萄酒胎记——系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
葡萄酒胎记(PWB)是婴儿常见的血管畸形。尽管有各种各样的激光和光疗法,但其有效性的比较数据是有限的。本研究采用系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较了PWB的不同治疗方法。我们检索了截至2023年11月的随机对照试验(rct)和正在进行的研究:主要结果是患者满意度、研究者评估的红肿减少和长期不良事件(ae)。使用Cochrane Risk of bias 2工具评估偏倚风险。我们确定了27个随机对照试验用于定性分析,12个随机对照试验用于NMA,涵盖1033个观察结果,19个治疗方法和3个子网络。七项研究报告了患者满意度。血红蛋白介导的光动力治疗在病变清除方面比PDL更有效,但ae的风险最高。755 nm紫翠石激光和595 nm PDL + 1064 nm Nd:YAG的组合也显示出较高的AE风险。ae导致的停药率没有显著差异。大多数研究存在不明确的偏倚风险,主要是由于报告不足。这项研究是第一个比较激光和光基治疗PWB的NMA。需要进一步精心设计的研究来确定个体化治疗的最佳方法和患者影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
期刊最新文献
Garadacimab for the long-term prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema. A solitary reddish nodule on the chest of a 36-year-old woman. Cold plasma treatment for oral lichen planus: a retrospective case collection and proposal of a new clinical score. Efficient triage and improved patient care: Five years of teledermatology in Styria. Development and validation of the Essen Melanoma Quality of Life Inventory (EMQoLI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1