Jiayu Gao, Yang Yang, Xingmei Yang, Xuemei Tang, Yili Qu, Yingying Wu, Lin Xiang, Yi Man
{"title":"Impact of Vertical Inter-Implant Distance in Two Adjacent Single-Unit Posterior Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study With 1-8 Years of Follow-Up.","authors":"Jiayu Gao, Yang Yang, Xingmei Yang, Xuemei Tang, Yili Qu, Yingying Wu, Lin Xiang, Yi Man","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.14094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the impact of different vertical interimplant distances (VIDs) on the long-term success of two adjacent single-unit implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study categorized implants into two groups based on VID: Group 1 (VID < 2 mm) and Group 2 (VID ≥ 2 mm). Further classification was done according to horizontal inter-implant distance (HID). Statistical models were used to evaluate the primary outcome of implant survival, secondary outcomes of complication-free survival rates and radiological findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 290 patients with 376 two adjacent single-unit implants. Group 1 included 223 patients with 280 implants, whereas Group 2 comprised 89 patients with 96 implants. The implant survival rates were 93.2% in Group 1 and 96.8% in Group 2 over the 8 years, with no significant association between the groups. Similarly, the overall complication-free survival rates were 60.6% in Group 1 and 65.6% in Group 2, showing no significant association between the groups. Radiological assessments also showed no notable association between the groups. This trend was consistent in the subgroup analyses based on HID, with no significant differences in implant survival, complication-free survival rates or radiological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the study limitations of an 8-year post-prosthetic review period and despite varying VIDs, our findings showed no significant difference in implant survival, complication-free survival rates or radiological assessments. This underscores the positive prognosis of two adjacent single-unit implants and contributes to a deeper understanding of the success factors in implantology.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073215).</p>","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.14094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the impact of different vertical interimplant distances (VIDs) on the long-term success of two adjacent single-unit implants.
Materials and methods: This retrospective study categorized implants into two groups based on VID: Group 1 (VID < 2 mm) and Group 2 (VID ≥ 2 mm). Further classification was done according to horizontal inter-implant distance (HID). Statistical models were used to evaluate the primary outcome of implant survival, secondary outcomes of complication-free survival rates and radiological findings.
Results: We included 290 patients with 376 two adjacent single-unit implants. Group 1 included 223 patients with 280 implants, whereas Group 2 comprised 89 patients with 96 implants. The implant survival rates were 93.2% in Group 1 and 96.8% in Group 2 over the 8 years, with no significant association between the groups. Similarly, the overall complication-free survival rates were 60.6% in Group 1 and 65.6% in Group 2, showing no significant association between the groups. Radiological assessments also showed no notable association between the groups. This trend was consistent in the subgroup analyses based on HID, with no significant differences in implant survival, complication-free survival rates or radiological outcomes.
Conclusions: Considering the study limitations of an 8-year post-prosthetic review period and despite varying VIDs, our findings showed no significant difference in implant survival, complication-free survival rates or radiological assessments. This underscores the positive prognosis of two adjacent single-unit implants and contributes to a deeper understanding of the success factors in implantology.
Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073215).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.