Carolina Levis, Justino Sarmento Rezende, João Paulo Lima Barreto, Silvio Sanches Barreto, Francy Baniwa, Clarinda Sateré-Mawé, Fábio Zuker, Ane Alencar, Miqueias Mugge, Rodrigo Simon de Moraes, Agustín Fuentes, Marina Hirota, Carlos Fausto, João Biehl
{"title":"Indigenizing conservation science for a sustainable Amazon","authors":"Carolina Levis, Justino Sarmento Rezende, João Paulo Lima Barreto, Silvio Sanches Barreto, Francy Baniwa, Clarinda Sateré-Mawé, Fábio Zuker, Ane Alencar, Miqueias Mugge, Rodrigo Simon de Moraes, Agustín Fuentes, Marina Hirota, Carlos Fausto, João Biehl","doi":"10.1126/science.adn5616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Western science has a history of appropriating and neglecting Indigenous knowledge, but there has been a surge in the reevaluation of the relations between Indigenous and Western scientific communities worldwide (<i>1</i>). Indigenous theoretical framings and practices have been in dialogue with scientific ecological theories and practices in conservation sciences for more than four decades and are gaining traction (<i>2</i>). Scientific communities should make serious attempts to establish procedures for transdisciplinary and intercultural collaboration, engaging Indigenous peoples and their theories and practices to effectively augment and improve conservation research, policy, and action. Our collaborative research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars from diverse backgrounds identified consonances and dissonances between Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge systems on ecological sustainability of the Amazon. We suggest alternative pathways for opening spaces for dialogues between Western science–based conservation and restoration strategies and knowledges and practices of Indigenous peoples.</div>","PeriodicalId":21678,"journal":{"name":"Science","volume":"386 6727","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":45.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adn5616","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Western science has a history of appropriating and neglecting Indigenous knowledge, but there has been a surge in the reevaluation of the relations between Indigenous and Western scientific communities worldwide (1). Indigenous theoretical framings and practices have been in dialogue with scientific ecological theories and practices in conservation sciences for more than four decades and are gaining traction (2). Scientific communities should make serious attempts to establish procedures for transdisciplinary and intercultural collaboration, engaging Indigenous peoples and their theories and practices to effectively augment and improve conservation research, policy, and action. Our collaborative research involving Indigenous and non-Indigenous scholars from diverse backgrounds identified consonances and dissonances between Indigenous and Western scientific knowledge systems on ecological sustainability of the Amazon. We suggest alternative pathways for opening spaces for dialogues between Western science–based conservation and restoration strategies and knowledges and practices of Indigenous peoples.
期刊介绍:
Science is a leading outlet for scientific news, commentary, and cutting-edge research. Through its print and online incarnations, Science reaches an estimated worldwide readership of more than one million. Science’s authorship is global too, and its articles consistently rank among the world's most cited research.
Science serves as a forum for discussion of important issues related to the advancement of science by publishing material on which a consensus has been reached as well as including the presentation of minority or conflicting points of view. Accordingly, all articles published in Science—including editorials, news and comment, and book reviews—are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.
Science seeks to publish those papers that are most influential in their fields or across fields and that will significantly advance scientific understanding. Selected papers should present novel and broadly important data, syntheses, or concepts. They should merit recognition by the wider scientific community and general public provided by publication in Science, beyond that provided by specialty journals. Science welcomes submissions from all fields of science and from any source. The editors are committed to the prompt evaluation and publication of submitted papers while upholding high standards that support reproducibility of published research. Science is published weekly; selected papers are published online ahead of print.