Differential and synergistic effects of right and left atrial ganglionated plexi ablation in patients undergoing cardioneuroablation: results from the ELEGANCE multicenter study.
Pietro Francia, Daniel Viveros, Carlo Gigante, Giulio Falasconi, Diego Penela, David Soto-Iglesias, Federico Landra, Lucio Teresi, Julio Marti-Almor, José Alderete, Andrea Saglietto, Aldo Francisco Bellido, Dario Turturiello, Chiara Valeriano, Paula Franco-Ocaña, Fatima Zaraket, Maria Matiello, Juan Fernández-Armenta, Rodolfo San Antonio, Antonio Berruezo
{"title":"Differential and synergistic effects of right and left atrial ganglionated plexi ablation in patients undergoing cardioneuroablation: results from the ELEGANCE multicenter study.","authors":"Pietro Francia, Daniel Viveros, Carlo Gigante, Giulio Falasconi, Diego Penela, David Soto-Iglesias, Federico Landra, Lucio Teresi, Julio Marti-Almor, José Alderete, Andrea Saglietto, Aldo Francisco Bellido, Dario Turturiello, Chiara Valeriano, Paula Franco-Ocaña, Fatima Zaraket, Maria Matiello, Juan Fernández-Armenta, Rodolfo San Antonio, Antonio Berruezo","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01968-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardioneuroablation (CNA) treats reflex syncope by ablating ganglionated plexi (GPs) either confined to the right (RA) or left atrium (LA), or accessible from both. We assessed whether GP ablation in one atrium affects parasympathetic modulation in the other and how ablation sequence (RA then LA, or vice-versa) impacts efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two propensity-matched groups of patients with reflex syncope or functional bradycardia were analyzed. Group 1 received CNA in the RA first, followed by LA. Group 2 in the reverse order.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients were enrolled. In group 1, RA ablation prompted a heart rate (HR) increase (49.8 ± 10.6 vs. 61.2 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01) that was enhanced after LA ablation (60.3 ± 14.5 vs. 64.5 ± 14.4 bpm; p = 0.02). RA ablation did not reduce PR interval in any patient or modify the Wenckebach point (WP) (596 ± 269 vs. 609 ± 319 ms; p = 0.68), while additional LA ablation reduced PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (611 ± 317 vs. 482 ± 191 ms; p = 0.03). In group 2, LA ablation increased HR (56.7 ± 6.6 vs. 76.4 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01), with an additional effect of RA ablation (76.0 ± 16.5 vs. 85.4 ± 15.9 bpm; p < 0.01). LA ablation decreased PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (512 ± 182 vs .399 ± 85 ms; p = 0.01). Further RA ablation did not decrease PR or WP. CNA success was 82% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (p = 0.552). After 24.5 ± 6.1 months, 2 patients in group 1 vs. no patients in group 2 experienced symptom recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bi-atrial CNA provides incremental benefits after both RA and LA ablation. Starting ablation in the LA provides the most significant effect on vagal modulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01968-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cardioneuroablation (CNA) treats reflex syncope by ablating ganglionated plexi (GPs) either confined to the right (RA) or left atrium (LA), or accessible from both. We assessed whether GP ablation in one atrium affects parasympathetic modulation in the other and how ablation sequence (RA then LA, or vice-versa) impacts efficacy.
Methods: Two propensity-matched groups of patients with reflex syncope or functional bradycardia were analyzed. Group 1 received CNA in the RA first, followed by LA. Group 2 in the reverse order.
Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. In group 1, RA ablation prompted a heart rate (HR) increase (49.8 ± 10.6 vs. 61.2 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01) that was enhanced after LA ablation (60.3 ± 14.5 vs. 64.5 ± 14.4 bpm; p = 0.02). RA ablation did not reduce PR interval in any patient or modify the Wenckebach point (WP) (596 ± 269 vs. 609 ± 319 ms; p = 0.68), while additional LA ablation reduced PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (611 ± 317 vs. 482 ± 191 ms; p = 0.03). In group 2, LA ablation increased HR (56.7 ± 6.6 vs. 76.4 ± 13.8 bpm; p < 0.01), with an additional effect of RA ablation (76.0 ± 16.5 vs. 85.4 ± 15.9 bpm; p < 0.01). LA ablation decreased PR interval in 3 patients and mean WP (512 ± 182 vs .399 ± 85 ms; p = 0.01). Further RA ablation did not decrease PR or WP. CNA success was 82% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (p = 0.552). After 24.5 ± 6.1 months, 2 patients in group 1 vs. no patients in group 2 experienced symptom recurrence.
Conclusions: Bi-atrial CNA provides incremental benefits after both RA and LA ablation. Starting ablation in the LA provides the most significant effect on vagal modulation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.