[Nutrition practice in type 2 diabetes: construction, validity and reliability of a scale].

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS Nutricion hospitalaria Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.20960/nh.05147
Marcela Bañuelos Fonseca, Lilia Susana Gallardo Vidal, Iris Pineda Mujica, Adriana Jheny Rodríguez Méndez, Prishila Danae Reyes Chávez, Quintero Valdez Quintero Valdez
{"title":"[Nutrition practice in type 2 diabetes: construction, validity and reliability of a scale].","authors":"Marcela Bañuelos Fonseca, Lilia Susana Gallardo Vidal, Iris Pineda Mujica, Adriana Jheny Rodríguez Méndez, Prishila Danae Reyes Chávez, Quintero Valdez Quintero Valdez","doi":"10.20960/nh.05147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>diabetes is a complex disease that requires multiple strategies for glycemic control. The most challenging part is acquiring healthy eating practices. What is needed is to keep patients well informed and involved with their disease; for this, standardized, reliable instruments are required that allow evaluating the dietary practices in this population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>to build and to validate a highly reliable evaluation scale of feeding habits in patients with diabetes type 2.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>a cross-sectional design for the construction and validation of an evaluation scale for feeding habits in diabetes 2 patients. There were listed 63 questions subjected to review and statistics analysis that reduced it into a 30 ítems scale that was applied to 495 diabetes 2 patients in a first level attention clinic. There were used exploratory factorial analysis, sphericity Bartlett test, KMO, total variance explained, Spearman's r-test and Cronbach's alpha.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a final version was obtained containing 30 ítems distributed in 8 dimensions with 3 response options on the Likert scale, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.811. The exploratory factor analysis showed factor loads > 0.30. The total explained variance threw eight principal components; the KMO test = 0.833, Bartlett's test of sphericity, p = 0.000.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>the scale to evaluate eating practices in patients with type 2 diabetes has the validity and high reliability to be able to apply it to this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

.

Background: diabetes is a complex disease that requires multiple strategies for glycemic control. The most challenging part is acquiring healthy eating practices. What is needed is to keep patients well informed and involved with their disease; for this, standardized, reliable instruments are required that allow evaluating the dietary practices in this population.

Objective: to build and to validate a highly reliable evaluation scale of feeding habits in patients with diabetes type 2.

Methodology: a cross-sectional design for the construction and validation of an evaluation scale for feeding habits in diabetes 2 patients. There were listed 63 questions subjected to review and statistics analysis that reduced it into a 30 ítems scale that was applied to 495 diabetes 2 patients in a first level attention clinic. There were used exploratory factorial analysis, sphericity Bartlett test, KMO, total variance explained, Spearman's r-test and Cronbach's alpha.

Results: a final version was obtained containing 30 ítems distributed in 8 dimensions with 3 response options on the Likert scale, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.811. The exploratory factor analysis showed factor loads > 0.30. The total explained variance threw eight principal components; the KMO test = 0.833, Bartlett's test of sphericity, p = 0.000.

Conclusion: the scale to evaluate eating practices in patients with type 2 diabetes has the validity and high reliability to be able to apply it to this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
.背景:糖尿病是一种复杂的疾病,需要采取多种策略控制血糖。最具挑战性的部分是获得健康的饮食习惯。我们需要让患者充分了解并参与到他们的疾病中来;为此,我们需要标准化、可靠的工具来评估这一人群的饮食习惯。方法:采用横断面设计,构建并验证糖尿病 2 型患者饮食习惯评估量表。方法:采用横断面设计,构建并验证 2 型糖尿病患者进食习惯评估量表。对列出的 63 个问题进行审查和统计分析,将其缩减为 30 个项目的量表,并应用于一家一级护理诊所的 495 名 2 型糖尿病患者。结果:最终版本包含 30 个项目,分布在 8 个维度上,在李克特量表上有 3 个回答选项,Cronbach's alpha 为 0.811。探索性因子分析显示因子载荷大于 0.30。结论:评价 2 型糖尿病患者饮食习惯的量表具有有效性和高可靠性,可用于该人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
期刊最新文献
[Metabolic, clinical and body composition changes in Mexican adults undergoing bariatric surgery]. [Radiological versus endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis]. Decision tree model development and in silico validation for avoidable hospital readmissions at 30 days in a pediatric population. Heuristic evaluation of body mass index with bioimpedance data in the Mexican population. Weight-adjusted waist index predicts metabolic syndrome in Caucasian patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1