Comparative outcomes of video-assisted thyroidectomy and traditional open surgery: a 5-year analysis of a single center experience.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-12-11 DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101539
Kenzo Ohara, Takumi Kumai, Kan Kishibe, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Hiroki Komatsuda, Tatsuya Hayashi, Miki Takahara
{"title":"Comparative outcomes of video-assisted thyroidectomy and traditional open surgery: a 5-year analysis of a single center experience.","authors":"Kenzo Ohara, Takumi Kumai, Kan Kishibe, Hidekiyo Yamaki, Hiroki Komatsuda, Tatsuya Hayashi, Miki Takahara","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thyroidectomy versus those undergoing traditional open surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical records of 449 patients who underwent thyroid surgery at our institution between April 2017 and March 2022. Of these, 209 underwent video-assisted thyroidectomy, while 248 underwent traditional open surgery. After excluding those who received total thyroidectomy, central node dissection, or lateral node dissection, we focused our analysis on 136 patients with video-assisted lobectomy and 92 patients with traditional open surgery. We compared patient outcomes, including surgical results and adverse events, between these groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the maximum tumor diameter between the video-assisted lobectomy and traditional open surgery groups. However, no significant differences were noted in surgical time, bleeding, or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Video-Assisted Neck Surgery (VANS) offers great cosmetic benefits and is comparable to traditional open surgery in terms of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"91 2","pages":"101539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11698927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2024.101539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of patients undergoing video-assisted thyroidectomy versus those undergoing traditional open surgery.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical records of 449 patients who underwent thyroid surgery at our institution between April 2017 and March 2022. Of these, 209 underwent video-assisted thyroidectomy, while 248 underwent traditional open surgery. After excluding those who received total thyroidectomy, central node dissection, or lateral node dissection, we focused our analysis on 136 patients with video-assisted lobectomy and 92 patients with traditional open surgery. We compared patient outcomes, including surgical results and adverse events, between these groups.

Results: Significant differences were observed in the maximum tumor diameter between the video-assisted lobectomy and traditional open surgery groups. However, no significant differences were noted in surgical time, bleeding, or adverse events.

Conclusion: Video-Assisted Neck Surgery (VANS) offers great cosmetic benefits and is comparable to traditional open surgery in terms of adverse events.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的本研究旨在评估和比较接受视频辅助甲状腺切除术的患者与接受传统开放手术的患者的疗效:在这项回顾性研究中,我们回顾了2017年4月至2022年3月期间在我院接受甲状腺手术的449名患者的临床记录。其中,209 人接受了视频辅助甲状腺切除术,248 人接受了传统开放手术。在排除了接受全甲状腺切除术、中央结节切除术或侧结节切除术的患者后,我们重点分析了136名接受视频辅助甲状腺叶切除术的患者和92名接受传统开放手术的患者。我们比较了这两组患者的手术效果和不良反应等结果:结果:视频辅助肺叶切除术组和传统开放手术组的最大肿瘤直径存在显著差异。结果:视频辅助颈叶切除术组与传统开放手术组在肿瘤最大直径方面存在明显差异,但在手术时间、出血量或不良反应方面无明显差异:结论:视频辅助颈部手术(VANS)具有很好的美容效果,在不良反应方面与传统开放手术相当:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance. The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Effect of dupilumab on otitis media associated with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis. Genetic and audiological determinants of hearing loss in high-risk neonates. Otomycosis risk after non-suppurative middle ear surgery. A modified vertical pressure bandage to prevent pharyngocutaneous fistula after total laryngectomy. Comprehensive analysis of clinicopathologic and prognostic features in locally advanced thyroid papillary cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1