Diet quality patterns and chronic kidney disease incidence: a UK Biobank cohort study.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.005
Javier Maroto-Rodriguez, Rosario Ortolá, Veronica Cabanas-Sanchez, David Martinez-Gomez, Fernando Rodriguez-Artalejo, Mercedes Sotos-Prieto
{"title":"Diet quality patterns and chronic kidney disease incidence: a UK Biobank cohort study.","authors":"Javier Maroto-Rodriguez, Rosario Ortolá, Veronica Cabanas-Sanchez, David Martinez-Gomez, Fernando Rodriguez-Artalejo, Mercedes Sotos-Prieto","doi":"10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Only a few studies have investigated the role of diet on the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in European populations and have mainly focused on the Mediterranean diet. This is the first study to evaluate the association between various diet quality indices and CKD incidence in British adults.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study the relationship between a set of 6 different diet quality indices and CKD incidence among British adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort with 106,870 participants from the UK Biobank, followed from 2009 to 2012 through 2021. Food consumption was obtained from ≥2 24-h dietary assessments. Dietary patterns were assessed using previously established indices: Alternate Mediterranean Index (aMED), Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010, dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH), healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), and dietary inflammatory index (DII). Incident CKD was obtained from clinical records, death registries, and self-reports. Analyses were performed with Cox regression models and adjusted for the main confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 9.27 y, 2934 cases of CKD were ascertained. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of CKD for the highest compared with lowest tertile of adherence to each diet score were 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) for aMED, 0.94 (0.85, 1.03) for alternative healthy eating index 2010, 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for DASH, 0.79 (0.72, 0.87) for hPDI, 1.27 (1.16, 1.40) for uPDI, and 1.20 (1.18, 1.33) for DII. The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In British adults, higher adherence to the aMED, DASH, and hPDI patterns was associated with lower risk of CKD, whereas greater adherence to the uPDI and DII patterns was associated with greater risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":50813,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2024.12.005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Only a few studies have investigated the role of diet on the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in European populations and have mainly focused on the Mediterranean diet. This is the first study to evaluate the association between various diet quality indices and CKD incidence in British adults.

Objective: To study the relationship between a set of 6 different diet quality indices and CKD incidence among British adults.

Methods: A prospective cohort with 106,870 participants from the UK Biobank, followed from 2009 to 2012 through 2021. Food consumption was obtained from ≥2 24-h dietary assessments. Dietary patterns were assessed using previously established indices: Alternate Mediterranean Index (aMED), Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010, dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH), healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), and dietary inflammatory index (DII). Incident CKD was obtained from clinical records, death registries, and self-reports. Analyses were performed with Cox regression models and adjusted for the main confounders.

Results: After a median follow-up of 9.27 y, 2934 cases of CKD were ascertained. Hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) of CKD for the highest compared with lowest tertile of adherence to each diet score were 0.84 (0.76, 0.93) for aMED, 0.94 (0.85, 1.03) for alternative healthy eating index 2010, 0.77 (0.70, 0.85) for DASH, 0.79 (0.72, 0.87) for hPDI, 1.27 (1.16, 1.40) for uPDI, and 1.20 (1.18, 1.33) for DII. The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: In British adults, higher adherence to the aMED, DASH, and hPDI patterns was associated with lower risk of CKD, whereas greater adherence to the uPDI and DII patterns was associated with greater risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮食质量模式与慢性肾病发病率:英国生物库队列研究。
背景:在欧洲人群中,只有少数研究调查了饮食对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)风险的作用,主要集中在地中海饮食。这是第一个评估英国成人各种饮食质量指标与CKD发病率之间关系的研究。方法:从2009-2012年到2021年,来自英国生物银行的106870名参与者进行了前瞻性队列研究。从至少两次24小时饮食评估中获得食物消耗。使用先前建立的指数评估饮食模式:替代地中海指数(aMED),替代健康饮食指数2010 (AHEI-2010),停止高血压的饮食方法(DASH),健康植物性饮食指数(hPDI),不健康植物性饮食指数(uPDI)和饮食炎症指数(DII)。从临床记录、死亡登记和自我报告中获得CKD事件。采用Cox回归模型进行分析,并根据主要混杂因素进行调整。结果:中位随访9.27年,确诊CKD 2934例。CKD对每种饮食评分的最高和最低四分位数的风险比(95%置信区间)分别为:aMED 0.84 (0.76, 0.93), AHEI 0.94 (0.85, 1.03), DASH 0.77 (0.70, 0.85), hPDI 0.79 (0.72, 0.87), uPDI 1.27 (1.16, 1.40), DII 1.20(1.18, 1.33)。结果在敏感性分析中是稳健的。结论:在英国成年人中,较高的阿米德、DASH和hPDI模式的依从性与较低的CKD风险相关,而较高的uPDI和DII模式的依从性与较高的风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
332
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: American Journal of Clinical Nutrition is recognized as the most highly rated peer-reviewed, primary research journal in nutrition and dietetics.It focuses on publishing the latest research on various topics in nutrition, including but not limited to obesity, vitamins and minerals, nutrition and disease, and energy metabolism. Purpose: The purpose of AJCN is to: Publish original research studies relevant to human and clinical nutrition. Consider well-controlled clinical studies describing scientific mechanisms, efficacy, and safety of dietary interventions in the context of disease prevention or health benefits. Encourage public health and epidemiologic studies relevant to human nutrition. Promote innovative investigations of nutritional questions employing epigenetic, genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic approaches. Include solicited editorials, book reviews, solicited or unsolicited review articles, invited controversy position papers, and letters to the Editor related to prior AJCN articles. Peer Review Process: All submitted material with scientific content undergoes peer review by the Editors or their designees before acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of (poly)phenols following consumption of selected blueberries and a blueberry-rich protein bar by adult males and females: a randomized, crossover, controlled trial. Unveiling Sub-group Trends of Stunting and Wasting in Indian Children: A Serial Cross-sectional Analysis from National Family Health Surveys 3-5. Consuming Pecans as a Snack Improves Lipids/Lipoproteins and Diet Quality Compared to Usual Diet in Adults at Increased Risk for Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Protein glycation compromises the bioavailability of milk protein-derived lysine in vivo in healthy adult males: a double-blind randomized cross-over trial. Describing the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials: meta-research study of protocols published between 2012 and 2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1