Comparing anesthesia protocols in high intensity focused ultrasound treatments: The HIFU-pain study.

IF 1.5 Phlebology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1177/02683555241308044
Paolo Casoni, Emanuele Nanni, Matteo Pizzamiglio, Daniele Bissacco
{"title":"Comparing anesthesia protocols in high intensity focused ultrasound treatments: The HIFU-pain study.","authors":"Paolo Casoni, Emanuele Nanni, Matteo Pizzamiglio, Daniele Bissacco","doi":"10.1177/02683555241308044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Backgroundto compare different anesthesia protocols during High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for saphenous trunk (GSV/SSV) and/or varicosities incompetence treatment.Material and methodspatients with GSV/SSV incompetence with varicose veins underwent HIFU under different anesthesia protocols. The primary endpoint was the pain score during HIFU using a 10-point scale.ResultsOut of 262 legs analyzed, main pain score was 1.03 ± 1.27. Intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments resulted in less procedural pain if compared with intradermal ± perivenous protocols (1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; <i>p</i> = .001). Conversely, perivenous injection decrease early complete recanalization rate.ConclusionThese preliminary results suggest that HIFU is an almost pain-free procedure. Procedural pain could be further minimized by using specific intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments, despite perivenous anesthetic could improve postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241308044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroundto compare different anesthesia protocols during High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for saphenous trunk (GSV/SSV) and/or varicosities incompetence treatment.Material and methodspatients with GSV/SSV incompetence with varicose veins underwent HIFU under different anesthesia protocols. The primary endpoint was the pain score during HIFU using a 10-point scale.ResultsOut of 262 legs analyzed, main pain score was 1.03 ± 1.27. Intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments resulted in less procedural pain if compared with intradermal ± perivenous protocols (1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; p = .001). Conversely, perivenous injection decrease early complete recanalization rate.ConclusionThese preliminary results suggest that HIFU is an almost pain-free procedure. Procedural pain could be further minimized by using specific intradermal + oral anesthesia treatments, despite perivenous anesthetic could improve postoperative outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高强度聚焦超声治疗麻醉方案的比较:hifu -疼痛研究。
背景:比较高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗隐静脉主干(GSV/SSV)和/或曲张静脉功能不全期间的不同麻醉方案。材料与方法:GSV/SSV功能不全和曲张静脉患者在不同麻醉方案下接受HIFU治疗。主要终点是HIFU治疗过程中的疼痛评分,采用10分制:结果:在分析的 262 条腿中,主要疼痛评分为 1.03 ± 1.27。皮内+口服麻醉与皮内+静脉注射相比,手术疼痛更轻(1.30 ± 0.19 vs 0.81 ± 0.09; p = .001)。相反,静脉周围注射降低了早期完全再通率:这些初步结果表明,HIFU 是一种几乎无痛的手术。结论:这些初步结果表明,HIFU 是一种几乎无痛的手术,通过使用特定的皮内+口服麻醉治疗可进一步减少手术疼痛,尽管静脉周围麻醉可改善术后效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of transvaginal duplex ultrasound compared to catheter venography for the identification of pelvic vein incompetence. Factors associated with lymphedema volume in patients with unilateral lower extremity lymphedema. Revealing the origin of postsclerotherapy hyperpigmentation: Identification of melanin and hemosiderin as causative pigments in a histopathological study. Medical compression stockings reduce the symptoms of obesity-associated functional venous insufficiency. Potential relationship between chronic venous insufficiency and orthostatic hypotension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1