Crossing borders to meet cardiac surgical needs: A scoping review on patients seeking cardiac surgery abroad.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116133
Nicolas Mourad, Kelsey Stefanyk, Dominique Vervoort
{"title":"Crossing borders to meet cardiac surgical needs: A scoping review on patients seeking cardiac surgery abroad.","authors":"Nicolas Mourad, Kelsey Stefanyk, Dominique Vervoort","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 100 countries do not have a local cardiac surgeon, whereas capacity, coverage, or cultural constrains may limit access to cardiac surgical care in-country. This scoping review aims to summarize the current literature of patients seeking cardiac surgical care abroad and determine research gaps for this understudied aspect of global surgical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted on patients seeking cardiac surgery outside of their home country using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, WHO Global Index Medicus, and PubMed databases. Relevant articles were descriptively and quantitatively summarized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 49 articles and 6351 patients, the most common procedures were coronary artery bypass grafts & valve procedures (N ​= ​3948; 62 ​%) and congenital heart disease repairs (N ​= ​2049; 32 ​%). The most prevalent countries of origin were Japan, Nigeria, and the United Arab Emirates. The United States, France, and the United Kingdom were the most common destination countries. Most patients (N ​= ​1483; 23 ​%) sought care abroad due to limited therapeutic options in the home country. Funding sources stemmed comparably from government funding, non-governmental organization funding, and out-of-pocket payments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The extent of and reasons for individuals traveling abroad for cardiac surgery are poorly described. Localizing cardiac care, while requiring significant resources, may lead to substantial cost savings and improved access to care. Until then, improving access to international travel for cardiac surgery remains an important strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116133"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over 100 countries do not have a local cardiac surgeon, whereas capacity, coverage, or cultural constrains may limit access to cardiac surgical care in-country. This scoping review aims to summarize the current literature of patients seeking cardiac surgical care abroad and determine research gaps for this understudied aspect of global surgical care.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted on patients seeking cardiac surgery outside of their home country using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, WHO Global Index Medicus, and PubMed databases. Relevant articles were descriptively and quantitatively summarized.

Results: Out of a total of 49 articles and 6351 patients, the most common procedures were coronary artery bypass grafts & valve procedures (N ​= ​3948; 62 ​%) and congenital heart disease repairs (N ​= ​2049; 32 ​%). The most prevalent countries of origin were Japan, Nigeria, and the United Arab Emirates. The United States, France, and the United Kingdom were the most common destination countries. Most patients (N ​= ​1483; 23 ​%) sought care abroad due to limited therapeutic options in the home country. Funding sources stemmed comparably from government funding, non-governmental organization funding, and out-of-pocket payments.

Conclusions: The extent of and reasons for individuals traveling abroad for cardiac surgery are poorly described. Localizing cardiac care, while requiring significant resources, may lead to substantial cost savings and improved access to care. Until then, improving access to international travel for cardiac surgery remains an important strategy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨越国界以满足心脏手术需求:对寻求国外心脏手术的患者的范围审查。
背景:100多个国家没有当地的心脏外科医生,而能力、覆盖范围或文化限制可能限制了国内心脏外科护理的可及性。本综述旨在总结目前国外寻求心脏外科治疗的患者的文献,并确定全球外科治疗中这一研究不足方面的研究空白。方法:使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS、WHO Global Index Medicus和PubMed数据库对在本国以外寻求心脏手术的患者进行范围审查。对相关文章进行了描述性和定量总结。结果:在49篇文章和6351例患者中,最常见的手术是冠状动脉旁路移植术和瓣膜手术(N = 3948;62%)和先天性心脏病修复(N = 2049;32%)。最普遍的原籍国是日本、尼日利亚和阿拉伯联合酋长国。美国、法国和英国是最常见的目的地国家。大多数患者(N = 1483;23%)由于本国治疗选择有限而到国外求医。资金来源主要有政府资助、非政府组织资助和自费。结论:人们对出国进行心脏手术的程度和原因描述甚少。心脏护理本地化虽然需要大量资源,但可能会节省大量成本并改善获得护理的机会。在此之前,改善心脏手术的国际旅行仍然是一个重要的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the impact of family planning on medical students' perception of entering surgical residency. Representation of online LGBTQ+ support in general surgery residency programs. Comprehensive retrospective analysis of the European hernia Society quality of life in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction. When physician supply does not meet patient demand: A looming epidemic in vascular and renal care for a community with the highest incidence of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Comparison of emergency general surgery at a tertiary and community hospital: One surgeon's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1