NCCN guideline concordance in colon and rectal cancer patients within a comprehensive health system

Abstract

Background

The National Comprehensive Cancer Care Network (NCCN) provides recommendations for patients with colorectal cancer. Concordance with evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes. Our objectives were to 1) examine rates of guideline non-concordance in a large vertically integrated health system; 2) examine factors associated with non-concordant care, and 3) identify geographical patterns of non-concordant care.

Methods

Colorectal cancer patients were identified from a single-state 16 hospital health-system cancer registry diagnosed between 2011 and 2021. We defined major (MAJ) and minor (MIN) quality indicators of guideline-concordance based on NCCN guidelines. Regression methods were used to identify predictors of major quality criteria non-concordance. County-level mapping was used to identify geographical locations of the highest rates of non-concordance.

Results

Overall, 2324 patients with colon and rectal cancer were analyzed. There was a complete guideline concordance (an absence of guideline non-concordance) rate of 24.7​% (n ​= ​573), MIN only guideline non-concordance rate of 63.3​% (n ​= ​1471), and MAJ non-concordance rate of 12.4​% (n ​= ​280). Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for colon cancer were stage, >1 Charleson-Deyo Score, >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 hospital network used for care. Predictors of MAJ non-concordance for rectal cancer were >60 days from diagnosis to treatment, and >1 facility used for care. Marion county had the highest rates of non-concordance for colon and rectal cancer.

Conclusion

The majority of colon and rectal cancer patients in a large health system received guideline concordant major quality indicators, however 12​% of patients do not. An identifiable geographical location with the highest rates of non-concordance and its associated factors serves as a target for future quality improvement.