How do drivers perceive collision risk? A quantitative exploration in generalized two-dimensional scenarios.

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107879
Jinghua Wang, Guangquan Lu, Wenmin Long, Zhao Zhang, Miaomiao Liu, Yong Xia
{"title":"How do drivers perceive collision risk? A quantitative exploration in generalized two-dimensional scenarios.","authors":"Jinghua Wang, Guangquan Lu, Wenmin Long, Zhao Zhang, Miaomiao Liu, Yong Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Driving behavior is crucial in shaping traffic dynamics and serves as the foundation for safe and efficient autonomous driving. Despite the widespread interest in driving behavior modeling, existing models often focus on specific behaviors and cannot describe all types of vehicle movements, while vehicle status and driving scenarios are dynamic and infinite. That means comprehending and modeling generalized driving behavior mechanisms is essential. Risk Homeostasis Theory (RHT) emerges as a compelling conceptual framework to explain human risk behaviors comprehensively. The critical problem in modeling behavior using RHT is quantifying the subject risk precepted by humans. RHT has been applied in car-following behavior modeling based on the one-dimensional risk indicator Safety Margin (SM), simplifying the specific behavior along its direction. While the generalized perceived risk indicator on the two-dimensional surface still lacks. Considering the collision avoidance capacity from the driver's perspective, this paper proposes the two-dimensional safety margin (TSM) to describe the driver's risk perception in generalized driving scenarios with two-dimensional movements. Results demonstrate that TSM could accurately describe car-following behavior compared to existing risk indicators, with a 9.1 % correlation improvement and the reasonably calibrated response time (1.07 s). And TSM could effectively capture the discrepant risk perceptions of different drivers involved in the same conflict, underscoring the alignment of TSM with drivers' subjective risk perceptions. Besides, TSM reflects the risk homeostasis of driving behaviors, as both typical scenarios have the normally distributed and concentrated target levels. Further, TSM also achieves a generalized, scenario-independent risk quantification with a mean target level of 0.85. As a good representation of driver's risk perception in two-dimensional scenarios, TSM serves as a crucial basis in areas such as driving behavior modeling, and decision-making and testing of autonomous driving.</p>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"211 ","pages":"107879"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driving behavior is crucial in shaping traffic dynamics and serves as the foundation for safe and efficient autonomous driving. Despite the widespread interest in driving behavior modeling, existing models often focus on specific behaviors and cannot describe all types of vehicle movements, while vehicle status and driving scenarios are dynamic and infinite. That means comprehending and modeling generalized driving behavior mechanisms is essential. Risk Homeostasis Theory (RHT) emerges as a compelling conceptual framework to explain human risk behaviors comprehensively. The critical problem in modeling behavior using RHT is quantifying the subject risk precepted by humans. RHT has been applied in car-following behavior modeling based on the one-dimensional risk indicator Safety Margin (SM), simplifying the specific behavior along its direction. While the generalized perceived risk indicator on the two-dimensional surface still lacks. Considering the collision avoidance capacity from the driver's perspective, this paper proposes the two-dimensional safety margin (TSM) to describe the driver's risk perception in generalized driving scenarios with two-dimensional movements. Results demonstrate that TSM could accurately describe car-following behavior compared to existing risk indicators, with a 9.1 % correlation improvement and the reasonably calibrated response time (1.07 s). And TSM could effectively capture the discrepant risk perceptions of different drivers involved in the same conflict, underscoring the alignment of TSM with drivers' subjective risk perceptions. Besides, TSM reflects the risk homeostasis of driving behaviors, as both typical scenarios have the normally distributed and concentrated target levels. Further, TSM also achieves a generalized, scenario-independent risk quantification with a mean target level of 0.85. As a good representation of driver's risk perception in two-dimensional scenarios, TSM serves as a crucial basis in areas such as driving behavior modeling, and decision-making and testing of autonomous driving.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驶员如何感知碰撞风险?通用二维场景中的定量探索。
驾驶行为对塑造交通动态至关重要,是安全高效的自动驾驶的基础。尽管人们对驾驶行为建模有着广泛的兴趣,但现有的模型往往只关注特定的行为,不能描述所有类型的车辆运动,而车辆的状态和驾驶场景是动态的、无限的。这意味着理解和建模广义驱动行为机制是必不可少的。风险稳态理论(RHT)作为一个引人注目的概念框架来全面解释人类的风险行为。利用RHT进行行为建模的关键问题是对人类感知的主体风险进行量化。将RHT应用于基于一维风险指标安全裕度(Safety Margin, SM)的跟车行为建模中,简化了沿其方向的具体行为。而二维平面上的广义感知风险指标仍缺乏。从驾驶员角度考虑避碰能力,提出二维安全裕度(TSM)来描述具有二维运动的广义驾驶场景下驾驶员的风险感知。结果表明,与现有风险指标相比,TSM能够准确地描述跟车行为,相关系数提高了9.1%,反应时间(1.07 s)调整合理,TSM能够有效捕捉同一冲突中不同驾驶员的风险感知差异,突出了TSM与驾驶员主观风险感知的一致性。此外,TSM反映了驾驶行为的风险稳态,两种典型情景均具有正态分布和集中的目标水平。此外,TSM还实现了一个广义的、独立于场景的风险量化,平均目标水平为0.85。TSM可以很好地反映驾驶员在二维场景下的风险感知,是驾驶行为建模、自动驾驶决策与测试等领域的重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
A game-theoretic driver steering model with individual risk perception field generation. Young Motorcyclists' Behavior Analysis in Pakistan based on Modified Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire (MRBQ). A discrete choice latent class method for capturing unobserved heterogeneity in cyclist crossing behaviour at crosswalks. Assessing e-scooter rider safety perceptions in shared spaces: Evidence from a video experiment in Sweden. Examining macro-level traffic crashes considering nonlinear and spatiotemporal spillover effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1