A scoping review of participant reported outcome measures assessed during live and simulated surgical procedures.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116131
Aaron K Budden, Sophia Song, Amanda Henry, Claire E Wakefield, Jason A Abbott
{"title":"A scoping review of participant reported outcome measures assessed during live and simulated surgical procedures.","authors":"Aaron K Budden, Sophia Song, Amanda Henry, Claire E Wakefield, Jason A Abbott","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study aims to describe current use of participant-reported outcome measures (PROM) to assess stress in surgeons that may impact patient and surgeon wellbeing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and clinical trial registries were searched. Articles reporting PROM of stress in live or simulated surgery were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,160 articles screened, 67 were included in the review. PROM tools identified include task load index (TLX), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ), and single question scales. PROM scores increased from baseline to procedure in single question scales and DSSQ. STAI increased by ​≥ ​1 point in 37-75 ​%. TLX scores were greater at laparoscopy vs robot, single incision laparoscopy and open surgery vs conventional laparoscopy. Residents showed higher mental demand than attendings. Music lowered TLX scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anxiety, stress, and workload have been measured in surgeons although the most appropriate to monitor surgeon wellbeing is not clear.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"240 ","pages":"116131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116131","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study aims to describe current use of participant-reported outcome measures (PROM) to assess stress in surgeons that may impact patient and surgeon wellbeing.

Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and clinical trial registries were searched. Articles reporting PROM of stress in live or simulated surgery were included.

Results: Of 10,160 articles screened, 67 were included in the review. PROM tools identified include task load index (TLX), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ), and single question scales. PROM scores increased from baseline to procedure in single question scales and DSSQ. STAI increased by ​≥ ​1 point in 37-75 ​%. TLX scores were greater at laparoscopy vs robot, single incision laparoscopy and open surgery vs conventional laparoscopy. Residents showed higher mental demand than attendings. Music lowered TLX scores.

Conclusions: Anxiety, stress, and workload have been measured in surgeons although the most appropriate to monitor surgeon wellbeing is not clear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对参与者报告的在现场和模拟手术过程中进行评估的结果指标进行范围审查。
背景:本研究旨在描述当前使用参与者报告的结果测量(PROM)来评估外科医生的压力,这可能会影响患者和外科医生的健康。方法:检索Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和临床试验注册库。包括了报道现场或模拟手术中压力致早破的文章。结果:在10,160篇被筛选的文章中,67篇被纳入本综述。确定的PROM工具包括任务负荷指数(TLX)、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)、邓迪压力状态问卷(DSSQ)和单题量表。在单题量表和DSSQ中,PROM得分从基线到程序均有所增加。STAI升高≥1点的占37 ~ 75%。腹腔镜手术TLX评分高于机器人手术,单切口腹腔镜手术TLX评分高于常规腹腔镜TLX评分。住院医师的心理需求高于主治医师。音乐降低了TLX分数。结论:外科医生的焦虑、压力和工作量已被测量,但最适合监测外科医生的健康状况尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the impact of family planning on medical students' perception of entering surgical residency. Representation of online LGBTQ+ support in general surgery residency programs. Comprehensive retrospective analysis of the European hernia Society quality of life in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction. When physician supply does not meet patient demand: A looming epidemic in vascular and renal care for a community with the highest incidence of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Comparison of emergency general surgery at a tertiary and community hospital: One surgeon's perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1