Safety of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia: A systematic review

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100124
Yanping Chen , Ruilin Xiong , Shaopeng Yang , Ziyu Zhu , Huangdong Li , Kaidi Xiang , Nathan Congdon , Wei Wang , Mingguang He
{"title":"Safety of repeated low-level red-light therapy for myopia: A systematic review","authors":"Yanping Chen ,&nbsp;Ruilin Xiong ,&nbsp;Shaopeng Yang ,&nbsp;Ziyu Zhu ,&nbsp;Huangdong Li ,&nbsp;Kaidi Xiang ,&nbsp;Nathan Congdon ,&nbsp;Wei Wang ,&nbsp;Mingguang He","doi":"10.1016/j.apjo.2024.100124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Establishing the safety profile of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is necessary prior to its widespread clinical implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42024516676) of articles across seven databases from inception through February 10, 2024, with keywords related to myopia and RLRL therapy. Pooled safety outcomes and risk-to-benefit ratios were reported, and incidence of side effects was compared with other antimyopia interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 689 screened articles, 20 studies (2.90 %; median duration 9 months, longest 24 months) were analysed, encompassing 2380 participants aged 3–18 years and 1436 individuals undergoing RLRL therapy. Two case reports described an identical patient with reversible decline in visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, completely resolved 4 months after treatment cessation. No cases of permanent vision loss were reported. Temporary afterimage was the most common ocular symptom following treatment, resolving within 6 minutes in reported studies. The number needed to harm outweighed the number needed to treat by a ratio of 12.7–21.4 for a person with –3D to –8D myopia treated with RLRL therapy. Incidence of side effects from RLRL was 0.088 per 100 patient-years (95 % confidence interval, 0.02–0.50).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>No irreversible visual function loss or ocular structural damage was identified with RLRL. Fundus photography and OCT before and during therapy, alongside home monitoring of visual acuity and duration of afterimages, are necessary to identify side effects. Further adequately powered studies of longer duration are needed to evaluate long-term safety of RLRL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8594,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"13 6","pages":"Article 100124"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162098924001440","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Establishing the safety profile of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy is necessary prior to its widespread clinical implementation.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42024516676) of articles across seven databases from inception through February 10, 2024, with keywords related to myopia and RLRL therapy. Pooled safety outcomes and risk-to-benefit ratios were reported, and incidence of side effects was compared with other antimyopia interventions.

Results

Among 689 screened articles, 20 studies (2.90 %; median duration 9 months, longest 24 months) were analysed, encompassing 2380 participants aged 3–18 years and 1436 individuals undergoing RLRL therapy. Two case reports described an identical patient with reversible decline in visual acuity and optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities, completely resolved 4 months after treatment cessation. No cases of permanent vision loss were reported. Temporary afterimage was the most common ocular symptom following treatment, resolving within 6 minutes in reported studies. The number needed to harm outweighed the number needed to treat by a ratio of 12.7–21.4 for a person with –3D to –8D myopia treated with RLRL therapy. Incidence of side effects from RLRL was 0.088 per 100 patient-years (95 % confidence interval, 0.02–0.50).

Conclusions

No irreversible visual function loss or ocular structural damage was identified with RLRL. Fundus photography and OCT before and during therapy, alongside home monitoring of visual acuity and duration of afterimages, are necessary to identify side effects. Further adequately powered studies of longer duration are needed to evaluate long-term safety of RLRL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重复低强度红光疗法治疗近视的安全性:系统回顾。
目的:在临床广泛应用前,有必要建立重复低水平红灯(RLRL)治疗的安全性。方法:我们对7个数据库从成立到2024年2月10日的文章进行了系统评价(国际前瞻性系统评价注册表,CRD42024516676),关键词为近视和RLRL治疗。报告了综合安全结果和风险收益比,并比较了其他抗近视干预措施的副作用发生率。结果:689篇筛选文献中,20篇研究(2.90%;中位持续时间9个月,最长24个月),包括2380名3至18岁的参与者和1436名接受RLRL治疗的个体。两例病例报告描述了同一例患者的可逆性视力下降和光学相干断层扫描(OCT)异常,在停止治疗4个月后完全消退。无永久性视力丧失病例报告。暂时性后像是治疗后最常见的眼部症状,在报道的研究中,在6分钟内消失。对于接受RLRL治疗的-3D至-8D近视患者,伤害所需的数量比治疗所需的数量多12.7比21.4。RLRL的副作用发生率为0.088 / 100患者年(95%可信区间,0.02-0.50)。结论:无不可逆性视功能丧失或眼结构损伤。治疗前和治疗期间眼底摄影和OCT,以及家庭视力监测和后像持续时间,是识别副作用的必要条件。评估RLRL的长期安全性需要进一步的、有充分证据的、持续时间更长的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology, a bimonthly, peer-reviewed online scientific publication, is an official publication of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology (APAO), a supranational organization which is committed to research, training, learning, publication and knowledge and skill transfers in ophthalmology and visual sciences. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology welcomes review articles on currently hot topics, original, previously unpublished manuscripts describing clinical investigations, clinical observations and clinically relevant laboratory investigations, as well as .perspectives containing personal viewpoints on topics with broad interests. Editorials are published by invitation only. Case reports are generally not considered. The Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology covers 16 subspecialties and is freely circulated among individual members of the APAO’s member societies, which amounts to a potential readership of over 50,000.
期刊最新文献
The whole life cycle myopia management. How to diagnose glaucoma in myopic eyes by detecting structural changes? Clinical practices on acute acquired comitant esotropia: A consensus statement proposed by the Council of Asia-Pacific Strabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology Society Outdoor activity during class recess prevents myopia onset and shift in premyopic children: Subgroup analysis in the recess outside classroom study Treatment modalities and trends for hospitalized patients with neovascular glaucoma: A retrospective study of 10 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1