Developmental normative data for the Balance Tracking System modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance protocol.

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106146
Daniel J Goble, Kirstie Barnes, Josephine I Lang, Shweta Kapur, Sophia K Rosiek, Joshua L Haworth
{"title":"Developmental normative data for the Balance Tracking System modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance protocol.","authors":"Daniel J Goble, Kirstie Barnes, Josephine I Lang, Shweta Kapur, Sophia K Rosiek, Joshua L Haworth","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A growing number of practitioners are implementing the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) to evaluate the sensory sources of balance feedback used to maintain upright standing. The aim of the current study was to expand existing BTrackS mCTSIB normative databases on adults to include reference values from developmental age groups. Participants included children (age range = 5-8 years; n = 212), adolescents (age range = 9-12 years; n = 103), teenagers (age range = 13-17 years; n = 152), and young adults (age range = 18-29 years; n = 779). Testing consisted of four, 20-s trials of static standing on the BTrackS Balance Plate. Each trial systematically manipulated the relative contributions of the vision, proprioception, and vestibular sensory systems. Based on the total center of pressure path length metric from the BTrackS Assess Balance software, it was found that females generally outperformed males in all age groups and sensory conditions. Both sexes showed improvements in balance with age when comparing children and adolescents. However, only in the Standard and Proprioceptive conditions were further age-related improvements seen for the adolescent and young adult groups. The current findings provide useful information demonstrating that sensory feedback processing for balance improves at different rates during development. Percentile ranking \"look-up\" tables are also provided as a tool for practitioners performing BTrackS mCTSIB testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"252 ","pages":"106146"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A growing number of practitioners are implementing the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) to evaluate the sensory sources of balance feedback used to maintain upright standing. The aim of the current study was to expand existing BTrackS mCTSIB normative databases on adults to include reference values from developmental age groups. Participants included children (age range = 5-8 years; n = 212), adolescents (age range = 9-12 years; n = 103), teenagers (age range = 13-17 years; n = 152), and young adults (age range = 18-29 years; n = 779). Testing consisted of four, 20-s trials of static standing on the BTrackS Balance Plate. Each trial systematically manipulated the relative contributions of the vision, proprioception, and vestibular sensory systems. Based on the total center of pressure path length metric from the BTrackS Assess Balance software, it was found that females generally outperformed males in all age groups and sensory conditions. Both sexes showed improvements in balance with age when comparing children and adolescents. However, only in the Standard and Proprioceptive conditions were further age-related improvements seen for the adolescent and young adult groups. The current findings provide useful information demonstrating that sensory feedback processing for balance improves at different rates during development. Percentile ranking "look-up" tables are also provided as a tool for practitioners performing BTrackS mCTSIB testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balance Tracking System(平衡跟踪系统)改良版临床感觉统合与平衡测试方案的发育常模数据。
越来越多的从业人员正在使用平衡追踪系统(BTrackS)改良版感觉统合与平衡临床测试(mCTSIB)来评估用于保持直立的平衡反馈感觉源。本研究旨在扩展现有的 BTrackS mCTSIB 成人常模数据库,以纳入发育年龄组的参考值。参与者包括儿童(5-8 岁,212 人)、青少年(9-12 岁,103 人)、少年(13-17 岁,152 人)和青年(18-29 岁,779 人)。测试包括在 BTrackS 平衡板上进行四次 20 秒钟的静态站立试验。每次试验都系统地操纵视觉、本体感觉和前庭感觉系统的相对贡献。根据 BTrackS 平衡评估软件得出的总压力中心路径长度指标,我们发现在所有年龄组和感官条件下,女性的表现普遍优于男性。与儿童和青少年相比,两性的平衡能力都随着年龄的增长而提高。不过,只有在标准和感觉条件下,青少年和年轻成人组才会出现与年龄相关的进一步改善。目前的研究结果提供了有用的信息,表明平衡感觉反馈处理在发育过程中会以不同的速度得到改善。此外,还提供了百分位数排名 "查询 "表,作为从业人员进行 BTrackS mCTSIB 测试的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
The relation of verbal and nonverbal skills to basic numerical processing of preterm versus term-born preschoolers. Do children match described probabilities? The sampling hypothesis applied to repeated risky choice. The impact of absolute and relative feedback on children's self-evaluation: Transitioning from kindergarten to first grade. Unraveling the small tie problem mystery: Size effects from finger counting to mental strategies in addition. Connections among family socioeconomic status, aerobic fitness, executive function, and the positive experiences of childhood physical activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1