Preschoolers’ use of emotional prosody in an unfamiliar language

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106190
Yomna Waly , Craig G. Chambers , Susan A. Graham
{"title":"Preschoolers’ use of emotional prosody in an unfamiliar language","authors":"Yomna Waly ,&nbsp;Craig G. Chambers ,&nbsp;Susan A. Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid and accurate recognition of another’s emotions is critical to successful communication. Previous research indicates that preschoolers can use emotional prosody in familiar languages to identify an object being referred to by a speaker (i.e., associate a happy tone with an intact object and a sad tone with a broken object). Here, we examined whether listeners’ use of emotional prosody is tied to language comprehension by testing English-speaking preschoolers’ and adults’ use of emotional prosody when presented with utterances spoken in Arabic. In Experiment 1, 4-year-olds listened to a series of happy- or sad-sounding Arabic utterances while simultaneously viewing a visual array of objects that varied in their association with happiness or sadness (e.g., broken vs. intact toy). In contrast to previous studies in which listeners heard English utterances, results suggested that children were unsuccessful at implicitly (demonstrated via eye gaze) or explicitly (demonstrated via pointing) linking emotional intonation with corresponding objects. A second experiment demonstrated that 4-year-olds could, however, successfully match the same emotional utterances with happy or sad faces. Experiment 3 examined these abilities in English-speaking adults using the same materials. Adults correctly linked emotional prosody to both objects and faces. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that both 4-year-olds and adults can correctly categorize emotional intonation in an unfamiliar language. Only adults, however, were successful at using emotional prosody to help identify an object a speaker is referring to. These findings demonstrate developmental differences in the use of emotional prosody.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524003308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid and accurate recognition of another’s emotions is critical to successful communication. Previous research indicates that preschoolers can use emotional prosody in familiar languages to identify an object being referred to by a speaker (i.e., associate a happy tone with an intact object and a sad tone with a broken object). Here, we examined whether listeners’ use of emotional prosody is tied to language comprehension by testing English-speaking preschoolers’ and adults’ use of emotional prosody when presented with utterances spoken in Arabic. In Experiment 1, 4-year-olds listened to a series of happy- or sad-sounding Arabic utterances while simultaneously viewing a visual array of objects that varied in their association with happiness or sadness (e.g., broken vs. intact toy). In contrast to previous studies in which listeners heard English utterances, results suggested that children were unsuccessful at implicitly (demonstrated via eye gaze) or explicitly (demonstrated via pointing) linking emotional intonation with corresponding objects. A second experiment demonstrated that 4-year-olds could, however, successfully match the same emotional utterances with happy or sad faces. Experiment 3 examined these abilities in English-speaking adults using the same materials. Adults correctly linked emotional prosody to both objects and faces. Taken together, the findings demonstrate that both 4-year-olds and adults can correctly categorize emotional intonation in an unfamiliar language. Only adults, however, were successful at using emotional prosody to help identify an object a speaker is referring to. These findings demonstrate developmental differences in the use of emotional prosody.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学龄前儿童在不熟悉的语言中使用情感韵律
快速准确地识别他人的情绪是成功沟通的关键。先前的研究表明,学龄前儿童可以使用熟悉的语言中的情感韵律来识别说话者提到的物体(即,将快乐的音调与完整的物体联系起来,将悲伤的音调与破碎的物体联系起来)。在这里,我们通过测试说英语的学龄前儿童和成年人在听到阿拉伯语的话语时对情感韵律的使用,来研究听者对情感韵律的使用是否与语言理解有关。在实验1中,4岁的孩子听了一系列听起来快乐或悲伤的阿拉伯语,同时观看了一系列与快乐或悲伤相关的视觉对象(例如,破碎的玩具和完好的玩具)。与之前听者听到英语话语的研究相反,结果表明,儿童无法将情绪语调与相应的物体含蓄地(通过眼睛注视)或明确地(通过手指指向)联系起来。第二个实验表明,4岁的孩子可以成功地将同样的情感话语与快乐或悲伤的表情相匹配。实验三用同样的材料测试了说英语的成年人的这些能力。成年人正确地将情感韵律与物体和面孔联系起来。综上所述,研究结果表明,4岁的孩子和成年人都能正确地对不熟悉的语言中的情绪语调进行分类。然而,只有成年人能够成功地利用情感韵律来帮助识别说话者所指的物体。这些发现证明了情感韵律使用的发展差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Confirmation bias in young children’s information seeking and evaluation of novel foods The role of audiovisual object features and scene context on children’s ability to categorise familiar objects The cost of curiosity: Information-reward tradeoffs in early childhood Role of socioeconomic status in children’s resource allocation under inequality Strategic self-initiated encoding in object-location memory in 8–10-year-old children
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1