Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Control Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10732748241305583
Tess Thompson, Christi M Lero, Julia Levitan, Cory D Bradley, Aimee S James, Katie Heiden-Rootes, Emani Sargent, LaShaune P Johnson
{"title":"Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.","authors":"Tess Thompson, Christi M Lero, Julia Levitan, Cory D Bradley, Aimee S James, Katie Heiden-Rootes, Emani Sargent, LaShaune P Johnson","doi":"10.1177/10732748241305583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer patients and their informal caregivers often report unmet psychosocial, relational, and physical health needs. Dyadic interventions may improve patient and caregiver outcomes, but few have been integrated into clinical care or designed for Black breast cancer patients and their female caregivers. We used the Health Equity Implementation Framework to design for dissemination by identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing a dyadic survivorship intervention delivered via video teleconferencing (e.g., Zoom).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 18 collaborators with roles at a comprehensive cancer center and community organizations to understand facilitators and barriers to implementing a dyadic intervention for Black breast cancer patients and their caregivers. We used rapid qualitative analysis (templated summaries synthesized in matrices) to conduct a directed content analysis. We identified patterns in responses to interview guide questions and developed cross-cutting themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Collaborators' roles fell into four domains: patient-facing mental health (33%), patient-facing physical health (28%), research/administration (28%), and cancer-focused community groups (11%). Participants were supportive of a dyadic intervention for Black women with breast cancer and female caregivers. Collaborators noted that psychosocial care at the cancer center was already being delivered via Zoom and saw benefits to including caregivers. Overarching themes include <i>the need to address gaps in care (for caregivers, Black women, and long-term breast cancer survivors); the importance of representation in building trust and mitigating stigma;</i> and <i>the challenges within the healthcare system around providing care services to dyads.</i></p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Application of these findings can help address the challenges of implementing a dyadic survivorship intervention for Black women with breast cancer and their caregivers in clinical settings. Expanding models such as the Health Equity Implementation Framework to include caregivers may help focus dissemination and implementation efforts on both members of a dyad and improve outcomes for both.</p>","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":"31 ","pages":"10732748241305583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241305583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer patients and their informal caregivers often report unmet psychosocial, relational, and physical health needs. Dyadic interventions may improve patient and caregiver outcomes, but few have been integrated into clinical care or designed for Black breast cancer patients and their female caregivers. We used the Health Equity Implementation Framework to design for dissemination by identifying facilitators and barriers to implementing a dyadic survivorship intervention delivered via video teleconferencing (e.g., Zoom).

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 18 collaborators with roles at a comprehensive cancer center and community organizations to understand facilitators and barriers to implementing a dyadic intervention for Black breast cancer patients and their caregivers. We used rapid qualitative analysis (templated summaries synthesized in matrices) to conduct a directed content analysis. We identified patterns in responses to interview guide questions and developed cross-cutting themes.

Results: Collaborators' roles fell into four domains: patient-facing mental health (33%), patient-facing physical health (28%), research/administration (28%), and cancer-focused community groups (11%). Participants were supportive of a dyadic intervention for Black women with breast cancer and female caregivers. Collaborators noted that psychosocial care at the cancer center was already being delivered via Zoom and saw benefits to including caregivers. Overarching themes include the need to address gaps in care (for caregivers, Black women, and long-term breast cancer survivors); the importance of representation in building trust and mitigating stigma; and the challenges within the healthcare system around providing care services to dyads.

Conclusion: Application of these findings can help address the challenges of implementing a dyadic survivorship intervention for Black women with breast cancer and their caregivers in clinical settings. Expanding models such as the Health Equity Implementation Framework to include caregivers may help focus dissemination and implementation efforts on both members of a dyad and improve outcomes for both.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于黑人妇女及其照顾者双癌生存干预的见解:合作者视角的快速定性分析。
背景:乳腺癌患者及其非正式护理人员经常报告未满足的社会心理、关系和身体健康需求。双重干预可能会改善患者和护理人员的预后,但很少有干预措施被纳入临床护理或为黑人乳腺癌患者及其女性护理人员设计。我们使用健康公平实施框架,通过确定通过视频电话会议(如Zoom)实施二元生存干预的促进因素和障碍,来设计传播。方法:我们对一家综合性癌症中心和社区组织的18名合作者进行了半结构化访谈,以了解对黑人乳腺癌患者及其护理人员实施二元干预的促进因素和障碍。我们使用快速定性分析(在矩阵中合成的模板摘要)来进行定向内容分析。我们确定了面试指导问题的回答模式,并开发了交叉主题。结果:合作者的角色分为四个领域:面对病人的心理健康(33%),面对病人的身体健康(28%),研究/管理(28%),以及关注癌症的社区团体(11%)。参与者支持黑人女性乳腺癌患者和女性护理者的二元干预。合作者指出,癌症中心的心理社会护理已经通过Zoom提供,并看到了包括护理人员在内的好处。总体主题包括需要解决护理方面的差距(照顾者、黑人妇女和长期乳腺癌幸存者);代表权在建立信任和减轻耻辱方面的重要性;以及医疗保健系统在为双性恋提供护理服务方面面临的挑战。结论:这些发现的应用可以帮助解决在临床环境中对黑人乳腺癌妇女及其护理人员实施二元生存干预的挑战。扩大卫生公平实施框架等模式,使其包括护理人员,可能有助于将传播和实施工作的重点放在一个群体的两个成员身上,并改善双方的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Public Policy to Address the Financial Burden of Breast Cancer Care in Nigeria: A Critical Imperative. Influence of Race, Ethnicity, and Nativity on Distribution and Outcomes Among Women With Choriocarcinoma in Florida. Exploratory Analysis of Candidate Gene SNPs in Relation to Cervical Cancer Susceptibility in Georgian Women. Incident Delirium in Hospitalized Cancer Patients: Clinical Factors Associated With Mortality and Prolonged Hospitalization. The Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention Acceleration and Improvement Platform (CRC-CHAMP) - Cohort Description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1