Exercise prescription prescriptions for frailty improvement in older adults: An evidence-based approach based on the 2024 older adult compendium

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Archives of gerontology and geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2024.105717
Wanli Zang , Mingqing Fang , Lingyue Meng , Lingyu Kong , Ningkun Xiao , Jingxian Xue , Ziyi Liu , Jiarong Wu , Yue Zhang , Xinhui Wei , Zijun Zhang , Qiuxia Zhang
{"title":"Exercise prescription prescriptions for frailty improvement in older adults: An evidence-based approach based on the 2024 older adult compendium","authors":"Wanli Zang ,&nbsp;Mingqing Fang ,&nbsp;Lingyue Meng ,&nbsp;Lingyu Kong ,&nbsp;Ningkun Xiao ,&nbsp;Jingxian Xue ,&nbsp;Ziyi Liu ,&nbsp;Jiarong Wu ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinhui Wei ,&nbsp;Zijun Zhang ,&nbsp;Qiuxia Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2024.105717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study explored the dose-response relationship of exercise prescriptions for improving frailty in older adults, based on the 2024 Older Adult Compendium. It aims to provide evidence-based support for developing frailty intervention programs and their clinical application.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to November 5th, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to exercise interventions in older adults were included. Relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected, and data were extracted for further analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using R, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) was used to quantify effect sizes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 16 eligible RCTs comprising 2,716 older adults were included. The meta-analysis revealed that exercise significantly improved frailty among older adults [SMD = -0.81, 95 % CI (-1.25, -0.38), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001]. However, high-intensity exercise did not demonstrate a significant effect on frailty improvement [SMD = -0.45, 95 % CI (-0.96, 0.06), <em>P</em> = 0.3]. The analysis indicated a nonlinear dose-response relationship between exercise and frailty improvement. The predicted values for frailty improvement at the minimum and maximum exercise doses recommended by the World Health Organization (600 MET-minutes/week and 1200 MET-minutes/week, respectively) were -0.79 (95 % CI [-1.17, -0.41]) and -1.39 (95 % CI [-2.62, -0.15]), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Low- to moderate-intensity exercise significantly improves frailty among older adults, while high-intensity exercise programs are not recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 105717"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167494324003923","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explored the dose-response relationship of exercise prescriptions for improving frailty in older adults, based on the 2024 Older Adult Compendium. It aims to provide evidence-based support for developing frailty intervention programs and their clinical application.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, OVID, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to November 5th, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to exercise interventions in older adults were included. Relevant studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected, and data were extracted for further analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using R, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) was used to quantify effect sizes.

Results

A total of 16 eligible RCTs comprising 2,716 older adults were included. The meta-analysis revealed that exercise significantly improved frailty among older adults [SMD = -0.81, 95 % CI (-1.25, -0.38), P < 0.001]. However, high-intensity exercise did not demonstrate a significant effect on frailty improvement [SMD = -0.45, 95 % CI (-0.96, 0.06), P = 0.3]. The analysis indicated a nonlinear dose-response relationship between exercise and frailty improvement. The predicted values for frailty improvement at the minimum and maximum exercise doses recommended by the World Health Organization (600 MET-minutes/week and 1200 MET-minutes/week, respectively) were -0.79 (95 % CI [-1.17, -0.41]) and -1.39 (95 % CI [-2.62, -0.15]), respectively.

Conclusion

Low- to moderate-intensity exercise significantly improves frailty among older adults, while high-intensity exercise programs are not recommended.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善老年人虚弱的运动处方:基于2024年老年人纲要的循证方法
目的:本研究基于2024年《老年人纲目》,探讨改善老年人虚弱的运动处方的剂量-反应关系。旨在为制定虚弱干预方案及其临床应用提供循证支持。方法:综合检索PubMed、OVID、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus等数据库,检索时间自成立至2024年11月5日。包括与老年人运动干预相关的随机对照试验(rct)。选择符合纳入标准的相关研究,提取数据进行进一步分析。评估纳入研究的质量。采用R进行meta分析,采用95%置信区间(95% CI)的标准化平均差(SMD)量化效应量。结果:共纳入16项符合条件的随机对照试验,包括2716名老年人。荟萃分析显示,运动显著改善老年人的虚弱[SMD = -0.81, 95% CI (-1.25, -0.38), P < 0.001]。然而,高强度运动并没有显示出明显的虚弱改善效果[SMD = -0.45, 95% CI (-0.96, 0.06), P = 0.3]。分析表明运动与虚弱改善之间存在非线性剂量-反应关系。世界卫生组织推荐的最小和最大运动剂量(分别为600 met -分钟/周和1200 met -分钟/周)的虚弱改善预测值分别为-0.79 (95% CI[-1.17, -0.41])和-1.39 (95% CI[-2.62, -0.15])。结论:低到中等强度的运动可以显著改善老年人的虚弱,而不推荐高强度的运动项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
16 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published. Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The temporal trend in frailty prevalence from 2011 to 2020 and disparities by equity factors among middle-aged and older people in China: A population-based study Social context matters: Neighborhood environment as a moderator of the longitudinal relationship between edentulism and cognitive function among older adults in the United States Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in the treatment of heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies Risk factors for sarcopenia in community setting across the life course: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1