Promotion of maize straw degradation rate by altering microbial community structure through the addition of soybean straw

IF 4.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Plant and Soil Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1007/s11104-024-07123-6
Xiaodan Liu, Hongrui Huo, Yuhang Zhang, Huawei Yang, Shumin Li, Lingbo Meng
{"title":"Promotion of maize straw degradation rate by altering microbial community structure through the addition of soybean straw","authors":"Xiaodan Liu, Hongrui Huo, Yuhang Zhang, Huawei Yang, Shumin Li, Lingbo Meng","doi":"10.1007/s11104-024-07123-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>The carbon–nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio) of straw significantly influences its mineralization and nutrient release when returned to the soil. However, little is known about the effects of different mixtures of different types of straw on straw mineralization, dynamic changes of soil properties, soil microbial communities and the growth of later maize.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This study was conducted through incubation and pot experiments, with 12 g/kg straw. Design of treatments included: (1) maize straw return (M), (2) soybean straw return (S), (3) 1:1 ratio of maize straw and soybean straw return (MS), (4) 2:1 ratio of maize straw to soybean straw return (2MS), (5) maize straw return combined with nitrogen fertilizer (MF) and (6) no straw return (NS).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Compared with M treatment, MS and MF treatment enhanced the straw mineralization rate and nutrient release, thus increasing the biomass of succeeding maize. The MS treatment increased the relative abundance of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteriota, and Proteobacteria by 15.54%, 5.36%, and 14.29%, respectively, compared to the M treatment. Straw return treatments significantly decreased the prevalence of the pathogenic fungus <i>Fusarium</i> compared to the NS approach. Correlation analyses indicated a positive association between soil chemical properties and the presence of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bdellovibrionota, and Nitrospirota. Conversely, these factors showed a negative correlation with Actinobacteriota, Gemmatimonadota, <i>Funneliformis</i>, <i>Trichoderma</i>, and <i>Fusarium</i>.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>In summary, the combined addition of soybean straw and maize straw in a 1:1 ratio optimizes the microbial community, enhances soil nutrient cycling, improves soil fertility, and positively affects maize biomass and nutrient uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-024-07123-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The carbon–nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio) of straw significantly influences its mineralization and nutrient release when returned to the soil. However, little is known about the effects of different mixtures of different types of straw on straw mineralization, dynamic changes of soil properties, soil microbial communities and the growth of later maize.

Methods

This study was conducted through incubation and pot experiments, with 12 g/kg straw. Design of treatments included: (1) maize straw return (M), (2) soybean straw return (S), (3) 1:1 ratio of maize straw and soybean straw return (MS), (4) 2:1 ratio of maize straw to soybean straw return (2MS), (5) maize straw return combined with nitrogen fertilizer (MF) and (6) no straw return (NS).

Results

Compared with M treatment, MS and MF treatment enhanced the straw mineralization rate and nutrient release, thus increasing the biomass of succeeding maize. The MS treatment increased the relative abundance of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteriota, and Proteobacteria by 15.54%, 5.36%, and 14.29%, respectively, compared to the M treatment. Straw return treatments significantly decreased the prevalence of the pathogenic fungus Fusarium compared to the NS approach. Correlation analyses indicated a positive association between soil chemical properties and the presence of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bdellovibrionota, and Nitrospirota. Conversely, these factors showed a negative correlation with Actinobacteriota, Gemmatimonadota, Funneliformis, Trichoderma, and Fusarium.

Conclusion

In summary, the combined addition of soybean straw and maize straw in a 1:1 ratio optimizes the microbial community, enhances soil nutrient cycling, improves soil fertility, and positively affects maize biomass and nutrient uptake.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过添加大豆秸秆改变微生物群落结构来提高玉米秸秆降解率
目的秸秆的碳氮比(C/N)显著影响秸秆还田时的矿化和养分释放。然而,不同类型秸秆混作对秸秆矿化、土壤性质动态变化、土壤微生物群落和后期玉米生长的影响尚不清楚。方法采用培养法和盆栽法,秸秆浓度为12 g/kg。处理设计包括:(1)玉米秸秆还田(M),(2)大豆秸秆还田(S),(3)玉米秸秆与大豆秸秆还田比例为1:1 (MS),(4)玉米秸秆与大豆秸秆还田比例为2:1 (2MS),(5)玉米秸秆配施氮肥(MF)和(6)秸秆不还田(NS)。结果与M处理相比,MS和MF处理提高了秸秆矿化率和养分释放,增加了后续玉米的生物量。与M处理相比,MS处理使Chloroflexi、Acidobacteriota和Proteobacteria的相对丰度分别提高了15.54%、5.36%和14.29%。秸秆还田处理显著降低了致病性真菌镰刀菌的发病率。相关分析表明,土壤化学性质与变形菌门、厚壁菌门、蛭弧菌门和亚硝基螺旋体门的存在呈正相关。相反,这些因素与放线菌、单胞双胞菌、漏斗菌、木霉和镰刀菌呈负相关。综上所述,大豆秸秆与玉米秸秆按1:1比例配施可优化微生物群落,促进土壤养分循环,提高土壤肥力,对玉米生物量和养分吸收有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
期刊最新文献
Positive shrub-soil feedbacks enhance growth of alpine juniper shrubs in the central Himalayas Fulvic acids as biostimulants in plant–soil systems: mechanistic insights into nutrient chelation, transport, and stress tolerance Effects of Irrigation Water Sources on Soil Fertility, Heavy Metal Accumulation in both Soil and Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Evidence synthesis of soil effects from conservation measures on the Loess Plateau Subsurface drip irrigation improving resource productivity in agricultural systems at different intensification levels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1