“Missing” power features in the Actor-Centered-Power framework: Systematic review and empirical insights from Central Africa's Dja and Faro Landscapes

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 ECONOMICS Forest Policy and Economics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103395
Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi , Shambhu Charmakar , Roland Azibo Balgah , Lukas Giessen
{"title":"“Missing” power features in the Actor-Centered-Power framework: Systematic review and empirical insights from Central Africa's Dja and Faro Landscapes","authors":"Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi ,&nbsp;Shambhu Charmakar ,&nbsp;Roland Azibo Balgah ,&nbsp;Lukas Giessen","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since its introduction about a decade ago, the Actor-Centered-Power (ACP) theoretical approach has been applied to analyze power manifestations and outcomes – particularly in forest resource management. This approach emphasized three power features, namely, coercion, (dis)incentives and dominant information. After a decade of empirical validation, it is imperative to take stock of its application while reflecting on potential “missing power features” in the ACP. In this paper, we propose four “missing power features” in the ACP theoretical approach. These include <em>social cohesion</em> (the societal glue), <em>geography</em> (landscape remoteness), <em>process</em> (the switch in the roles of potentates and subordinates in the same transaction), and <em>convictions</em> (narratives that steer an us-versus-them discourse). A fifth overarching missing element is <em>time</em> – here we argue that all power features in the ACP have a temporal dimension. The paper draws from theoretical reflections in other power studies, and a systematic review of 61 empirical literature on power in forest management institutions. To verify empirical trends from the systematic reviews through a contemporary example, qualitative data generated through the interview of key informants (<em>n</em> = 51), experts (<em>n</em> = 12), and focus group discussions (<em>n</em> = 10) from two cases in Central Africa is provided. Analysis of articles selected through systematic reviews and own empirical data allows us to draw the following conclusions: Firstly, 88 % of the reviewed papers captured the four missing power features with <em>social cohesion</em> and <em>geographical remoteness</em> dominating the literature (67 %). Secondly, empirical insights from the two cases in Central Africa confirmed the recurrence of <em>social cohesion</em> linked to ties with forest-related livelihood strategies, and <em>geographical remoteness</em> which enhances insecurity. Thirdly, conservation interventions are also shaped by the power and potency of <em>process</em>, indicating a role switch between the potentate and subordinate within the same transaction, and convictions linked to people's heritage. While <em>process, social cohesion and convictions</em> presents a useful opportunity for an actor-cum-institutions theoretical framework, geography elucidates the scale dimension which should be clarified. We suggest the incorporation of these power features with time standing as an overarching power feature.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12451,"journal":{"name":"Forest Policy and Economics","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 103395"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Policy and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934124002491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its introduction about a decade ago, the Actor-Centered-Power (ACP) theoretical approach has been applied to analyze power manifestations and outcomes – particularly in forest resource management. This approach emphasized three power features, namely, coercion, (dis)incentives and dominant information. After a decade of empirical validation, it is imperative to take stock of its application while reflecting on potential “missing power features” in the ACP. In this paper, we propose four “missing power features” in the ACP theoretical approach. These include social cohesion (the societal glue), geography (landscape remoteness), process (the switch in the roles of potentates and subordinates in the same transaction), and convictions (narratives that steer an us-versus-them discourse). A fifth overarching missing element is time – here we argue that all power features in the ACP have a temporal dimension. The paper draws from theoretical reflections in other power studies, and a systematic review of 61 empirical literature on power in forest management institutions. To verify empirical trends from the systematic reviews through a contemporary example, qualitative data generated through the interview of key informants (n = 51), experts (n = 12), and focus group discussions (n = 10) from two cases in Central Africa is provided. Analysis of articles selected through systematic reviews and own empirical data allows us to draw the following conclusions: Firstly, 88 % of the reviewed papers captured the four missing power features with social cohesion and geographical remoteness dominating the literature (67 %). Secondly, empirical insights from the two cases in Central Africa confirmed the recurrence of social cohesion linked to ties with forest-related livelihood strategies, and geographical remoteness which enhances insecurity. Thirdly, conservation interventions are also shaped by the power and potency of process, indicating a role switch between the potentate and subordinate within the same transaction, and convictions linked to people's heritage. While process, social cohesion and convictions presents a useful opportunity for an actor-cum-institutions theoretical framework, geography elucidates the scale dimension which should be clarified. We suggest the incorporation of these power features with time standing as an overarching power feature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以行动者为中心的权力框架中 "缺失 "的权力特征:中部非洲 Dja 和 Faro 地貌的系统回顾和经验启示
行动者为中心的权力(ACP)理论方法自大约十年前提出以来,已被应用于分析权力的表现形式和结果,特别是在森林资源管理方面。这种方法强调三个权力特征,即强制、(非)激励和主导信息。经过十年的经验验证,在反思ACP中潜在的“缺失的功能”的同时,对其应用进行评估是势在必行的。在本文中,我们提出了ACP理论方法中的四个“缺失功率特征”。这些因素包括社会凝聚力(社会粘合剂)、地理(景观偏远)、过程(同一交易中统治者和下属角色的转换)和信念(引导我们与他们话语的叙事)。第5个缺失的重要因素是时间——这里我们认为ACP中的所有功率特征都有一个时间维度。本文借鉴了其他权力研究的理论反思,并系统回顾了61篇关于森林经营机构权力的实证文献。为了通过一个当代例子验证系统综述的经验趋势,本文提供了通过对中非两个案例的关键举报人(n = 51)、专家(n = 12)和焦点小组讨论(n = 10)的访谈产生的定性数据。通过系统综述和自己的经验数据选择的文章分析,我们可以得出以下结论:首先,88%的被审查的论文捕捉到四个缺失的权力特征,社会凝聚力和地理偏远主导文献(67%)。第二,中非两个案例的经验见解证实,与与森林有关的生计战略联系在一起的社会凝聚力再次出现,地理上的偏远加剧了不安全。第三,保护干预也受到过程的权力和效力的影响,表明在同一交易中,当权者和臣服者之间的角色转换,以及与人们的遗产有关的信念。虽然过程、社会凝聚力和信念为行为者和制度的理论框架提供了有用的机会,但地理学阐明了应该澄清的规模维度。我们建议将这些功率特性与时间站立性结合起来,作为一个总体功率特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Policy and Economics
Forest Policy and Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
148
审稿时长
21.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Forest Policy and Economics is a leading scientific journal that publishes peer-reviewed policy and economics research relating to forests, forested landscapes, forest-related industries, and other forest-relevant land uses. It also welcomes contributions from other social sciences and humanities perspectives that make clear theoretical, conceptual and methodological contributions to the existing state-of-the-art literature on forests and related land use systems. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, sociology, anthropology, human geography, history, jurisprudence, planning, development studies, and psychology research on forests. Forest Policy and Economics is global in scope and publishes multiple article types of high scientific standard. Acceptance for publication is subject to a double-blind peer-review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Diversity of plant species used as firewood in indigenous colonized communities: An ethnobotanical study in East Misiones, Argentina “Hands off our forests!” - The impact of the authoritarian rule on polish forest policy in the context of the European Green Deal Bioeconomy governance in the global South: State of the art and the way forward Forest diversity and the distribution of farm revenue - Empirical evidence from forest farms in Taiwan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1