Comparison of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with electrosurgery instrument or hysteroscopic scissors in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions of infertile or recurrent pregnancy loss women.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8
Yang Li, Yangzhi Li, Yong Wang, Minzhi Hou, Xing Yan, Dongmei Chen, Yaxiao Chen, Meiqing Xie
{"title":"Comparison of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis with electrosurgery instrument or hysteroscopic scissors in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions of infertile or recurrent pregnancy loss women.","authors":"Yang Li, Yangzhi Li, Yong Wang, Minzhi Hou, Xing Yan, Dongmei Chen, Yaxiao Chen, Meiqing Xie","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-affiliated hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07866-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate pregnancy outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA) in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) or infertility.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: University-affiliated hospital.

Subjects: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, finally, a total of 461 subjects were included.

Interventions: HA performed using either an electrosurgical instrument or hysteroscopic scissors.

Main outcome measures: Pregnancy outcomes post-HA.

Results: A total of 461 patients were included in the study, with follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 6 years. The mean age was 29.48 ± 3.25 years. Hysteroscopic scissors demonstrated greater efficiency in restoring the uterine cavity compared to electrosurgical instruments (88.1% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.025). Post-HA, the pregnancy rate was approximately 75.3% (347/461), with a live birth rate of 55.9% (251/449). No significant differences were found between the electrosurgical instrument and hysteroscopic scissors groups regarding improvements in menstrual flow or fertility outcomes (all p > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier time-dependent cumulative curves for pregnancy and live birth rates after HA indicated that over 50% of patients achieved pregnancy within one year, with the pregnancy rate plateauing at 2 years and the live birth rate at 3 years.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that HA can improve fertility outcomes for patients with RPL or infertility within 2 to 3 years following surgery. Hysteroscopic scissors proved more effective than electrosurgical instruments in restoring the uterine cavity, although no differences were observed between the techniques in terms of menstrual flow or fertility improvements. All in all, our study suggests that standardized HA procedures, the implementation of proactive intraoperative and postoperative measures to prevent the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions (IUA), and an active conception plan following HA are key factors in improving reproductive outcomes for these patients with RPL or infertility.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫腔镜粘连分解术与电外科器械或宫腔镜剪刀在治疗不孕或复发性妊娠失败妇女宫腔内粘连方面的比较。
目的:研究复发性妊娠(RPL)或不孕症患者在宫腔镜粘连分解术(HA)后的妊娠结局:研究复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)或不孕症患者在宫腔镜粘连分解术(HA)后的妊娠结局:设计:回顾性队列研究:地点:大学附属医院:根据本研究的纳入和排除标准,最终共纳入 461 名受试者:主要结果指标:HA术后的妊娠结局:结果:研究共纳入461名患者,随访时间为1至6年。平均年龄为(29.48 ± 3.25)岁。与电外科器械相比,宫腔镜剪刀恢复宫腔的效率更高(88.1% 对 80.0%,P = 0.025)。HA后的妊娠率约为75.3%(347/461),活产率为55.9%(251/449)。在改善月经量或生育结果方面,电外科手术器械组和宫腔镜剪刀组之间没有发现明显差异(均 p > 0.05)。HA术后怀孕率和活产率的Kaplan-Meier时间累积曲线显示,超过50%的患者在一年内怀孕,怀孕率在2年后趋于稳定,活产率在3年后趋于稳定:我们的研究结果表明,HA 可以改善 RPL 或不孕症患者术后 2 到 3 年内的生育效果。在恢复宫腔方面,宫腔镜剪刀比电外科器械更有效,但在月经量或生育力改善方面,两种技术之间没有差异。总之,我们的研究表明,标准化的 HA 程序、术中和术后积极预防宫腔内粘连复发的措施以及 HA 术后积极的受孕计划是改善 RPL 或不孕症患者生殖效果的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
期刊最新文献
Should all cervical cancer patients with positive lymph node receive definitive radiotherapy: a population-based comparative study. Long-term effects of endometrial resection or ablation in combination with levonorgestrel intrauterine device on bleeding patterns. Comparing combined paravaginal repair with pubocervical fascia plication versus standard anterior colporrhaphy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomised controlled trial. Predictors of anxiety in endometriosis patients. Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of misplaced IUCDS and their complications, a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1