Organizing to address overtreatment in cancer care near the end of life: Evidence from Denmark.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Health Services Research & Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1177/13558196241300916
Amalie M Hauge, Nis Lydiksen, Mickael Bech
{"title":"Organizing to address overtreatment in cancer care near the end of life: Evidence from Denmark.","authors":"Amalie M Hauge, Nis Lydiksen, Mickael Bech","doi":"10.1177/13558196241300916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate how organizational factors influence the ethical and economic problems of overtreatment of cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study applies a sequential mixed-method approach. First, our logistic regression model assesses how patient characteristics and hospital department variables influence the use of late cancer treatment (LCT), primarily chemotherapy, in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer cases using Danish registry data. Department-specific variations in LCT use across hospitals are identified, while controlling for population differences. Then, using qualitative data, we explore organizational factors that may influence hospitals' decisions regarding LCT for lung cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 13% and 33.3% of the studied lung cancer population receive LCT within their last 30 days of life. Variation in LCT can in part be explained by organizational factors specific to the hospital departments and their organization of their treatment decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article is among the first to show how organizational solutions can contribute to curbing overtreatment. Hospital managers can seek to reduce overtreatment by (a) adjusting the format and frequency of patient consultations, (b) improving the cross-disciplinary collaboration structures, and (c) utilizing team conferences for discussions of treatment cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"89-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241300916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to investigate how organizational factors influence the ethical and economic problems of overtreatment of cancer patients.

Methods: The study applies a sequential mixed-method approach. First, our logistic regression model assesses how patient characteristics and hospital department variables influence the use of late cancer treatment (LCT), primarily chemotherapy, in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer cases using Danish registry data. Department-specific variations in LCT use across hospitals are identified, while controlling for population differences. Then, using qualitative data, we explore organizational factors that may influence hospitals' decisions regarding LCT for lung cancer patients.

Results: Between 13% and 33.3% of the studied lung cancer population receive LCT within their last 30 days of life. Variation in LCT can in part be explained by organizational factors specific to the hospital departments and their organization of their treatment decision-making process.

Conclusions: This article is among the first to show how organizational solutions can contribute to curbing overtreatment. Hospital managers can seek to reduce overtreatment by (a) adjusting the format and frequency of patient consultations, (b) improving the cross-disciplinary collaboration structures, and (c) utilizing team conferences for discussions of treatment cessation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织起来解决生命末期癌症护理中的过度治疗:来自丹麦的证据。
目的:本研究的目的是探讨组织因素如何影响癌症患者过度治疗的伦理和经济问题。方法:本研究采用顺序混合方法。首先,我们的logistic回归模型评估了患者特征和医院部门变量如何影响晚期癌症治疗(LCT)的使用,主要是化疗,在IV期非小细胞肺癌病例中使用丹麦注册数据。在控制人口差异的同时,确定了医院间LCT使用的特定科室差异。然后,使用定性数据,我们探讨可能影响医院对肺癌患者进行LCT决策的组织因素。结果:13% - 33.3%的肺癌患者在生命的最后30天内接受了LCT治疗。LCT的差异可以部分解释为医院部门的组织因素及其治疗决策过程的组织。结论:这篇文章是第一个展示组织解决方案如何有助于遏制过度治疗的文章。医院管理人员可以通过以下方式减少过度治疗:(a)调整患者咨询的形式和频率,(b)改善跨学科合作结构,以及(c)利用团队会议讨论停止治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
期刊最新文献
Impediments to diabetes management among older women: A qualitative study from rural Meghalaya, India. Understanding why health professionals are leaving the UK national health service (NHS) - A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Does the English NHS 10-year health plan offer transformational change and a break with the past or more of the same? Navigating North Carolina's Medicaid transformation: Caregivers' perspectives through a family-centered lens. Taskification in general practice: A solution to, or an aggravator of, the workforce crisis?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1