首页 > 最新文献

Journal of Health Services Research & Policy最新文献

英文 中文
Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort. 安大略省东南部协调护理患者的医疗利用率和成本:双倾向得分匹配队列的差异研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241290996
Ana P Johnson, Elizabeth Hore, Walter P Wodchis, Yu Qing Bai, Luke Mondor, Tim Tenbensel, Catherine Donnelly, Michael Green, Michael Spinks, Julia Swedak, Dianne McIntyre, Ashleigh Wolfe

Objectives: Coordinated care plans (CCPs) for high-cost health care system users aim to improve system-level performance. We evaluated health care resource use and costs among CCP patients (enrollees) versus a control group that did not receive coordinated care (comparators) in Southeastern Ontario.

Methods: A difference-in-differences analysis of a quasi-experimental, double propensity score-matched and adjusted cohort was conducted. Linked population-based administrative data were used to measure health care utilization and costs and to identify comparators for two enrollee groups who began CCPs between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. Enrollees were recruited from hospitals in Quinte or community care centres in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands, and were 1:1 propensity score matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were calculated using generalized estimating equations for hospitalization rates, homecare visits, primary care visits, other health care resources and total costs.

Results: A total of 558 enrollees in Quinte and 538 in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands were identified and matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were significant in both enrollee groups for number of homecare visits ([IRR 1.72; 95% CI (1.44, 2.06)] and [IRR 1.73; 95% CI (1.45, 2.06)], respectively). Number of primary care visits were 1.76 times greater for Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands enrollees versus comparators [IRR 1.76; 95% CI (1.32, 2.35)]; total costs increased by 23% ([IRR 1.23; 95% CI (1.09,1.39)].

Conclusions: Homecare use significantly increased for enrollees versus comparators, indicating specific priority areas of Ontario CCPs were met. However, no reductions were shown for other health system performance indicators. We also showed increased 7-day primary care follow-up visits for community care centre-recruited patients, but not for hospital-recruited patients. Decision-makers may wish to target patients who are less advanced in their chronic disease trajectory.

目标:针对高成本医疗系统用户的协调护理计划(CCP)旨在改善系统层面的绩效。我们对安大略省东南部的协调护理计划患者(参保者)与未接受协调护理计划的对照组(比较组)的医疗资源使用情况和成本进行了评估:对准实验、双倾向得分匹配和调整队列进行了差异分析。研究使用关联的人口行政数据来衡量医疗利用率和成本,并确定在 2013 年 4 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日期间开始接受 CCP 的两个参保者群体的比较者。参保者从昆特省的医院或黑斯廷斯/千岛群岛农村地区的社区护理中心招募,并与比较者进行 1:1 的倾向评分匹配。采用广义估计方程计算住院率、家庭护理就诊率、初级护理就诊率、其他医疗资源和总成本的差异估计值:共确定了昆特省的 558 名参保者和黑斯廷斯/千岛群岛农村地区的 538 名参保者,并与比较者进行了匹配。在两个参保者群体中,家庭护理就诊次数的差异估计值都很显著([IRR 1.72; 95% CI (1.44, 2.06)]和[IRR 1.73; 95% CI (1.45, 2.06)])。黑斯廷斯/千岛农村地区参保者的初级保健就诊次数是比较者的 1.76 倍 [IRR 1.76; 95% CI (1.32, 2.35)];总费用增加了 23% ([IRR 1.23; 95% CI (1.09,1.39)]):参保者与比较者相比,家庭护理的使用率明显增加,这表明安大略省社区保健方案的特定优先领域得到了满足。然而,其他医疗系统绩效指标并没有减少。我们还发现,社区护理中心招募的患者的 7 天初级保健随访次数有所增加,而医院招募的患者则没有增加。决策者不妨将慢性病发病率较低的患者作为目标人群。
{"title":"Health care utilization and costs among coordinated care patients in Southeastern Ontario: A difference-in-differences study of a double propensity score-matched cohort.","authors":"Ana P Johnson, Elizabeth Hore, Walter P Wodchis, Yu Qing Bai, Luke Mondor, Tim Tenbensel, Catherine Donnelly, Michael Green, Michael Spinks, Julia Swedak, Dianne McIntyre, Ashleigh Wolfe","doi":"10.1177/13558196241290996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241290996","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Coordinated care plans (CCPs) for high-cost health care system users aim to improve system-level performance. We evaluated health care resource use and costs among CCP patients (enrollees) versus a control group that did not receive coordinated care (comparators) in Southeastern Ontario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A difference-in-differences analysis of a quasi-experimental, double propensity score-matched and adjusted cohort was conducted. Linked population-based administrative data were used to measure health care utilization and costs and to identify comparators for two enrollee groups who began CCPs between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019. Enrollees were recruited from hospitals in Quinte or community care centres in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands, and were 1:1 propensity score matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were calculated using generalized estimating equations for hospitalization rates, homecare visits, primary care visits, other health care resources and total costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 558 enrollees in Quinte and 538 in Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands were identified and matched to comparators. Difference-in-differences estimates were significant in both enrollee groups for number of homecare visits ([IRR 1.72; 95% CI (1.44, 2.06)] and [IRR 1.73; 95% CI (1.45, 2.06)], respectively). Number of primary care visits were 1.76 times greater for Rural Hastings/Thousand Islands enrollees versus comparators [IRR 1.76; 95% CI (1.32, 2.35)]; total costs increased by 23% ([IRR 1.23; 95% CI (1.09,1.39)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Homecare use significantly increased for enrollees versus comparators, indicating specific priority areas of Ontario CCPs were met. However, no reductions were shown for other health system performance indicators. We also showed increased 7-day primary care follow-up visits for community care centre-recruited patients, but not for hospital-recruited patients. Decision-makers may wish to target patients who are less advanced in their chronic disease trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241290996"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142639142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of collaborative governance in translating national cancer programs into network-based practices: A longitudinal case study in Canada. 合作治理在将国家癌症计划转化为基于网络的实践中的作用:加拿大纵向案例研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241300109
Dominique Tremblay, Susan Usher, Karine Bilodeau, Nassera Touati
<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Networks (multiple organizations or actors coordinating their activities towards a common goal) have been promoted in the cancer programs of a number of countries. But there is little empirical evidence on whether and how they overcome the siloed functioning endemic in specialized domains. This study examines how collaborative governance takes shape to support integrated network-based practices within a prescribed national cancer program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal qualitative single-case study was conducted of the Quebec cancer network in Canada. Data were collected in 2018-2020 through semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 37) involved in regional and/or national cancer network structures and a review of documents (<i>n</i> = 45) generated at national and regional level. Abductive thematic analysis during and post-field work was based on Emerson's collaborative governance framework. It aimed to identify how collaborative governance mechanisms (principled engagement, shared motivation and capacity for joint action) were activated in the network, and their contribution to translating a national cancer program into network-based practices at the point of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Principled engagement was driven through interdisciplinary committees at national and regional level, communities of practice and trajectory-development efforts. These mandated structures supported knowledge exchange and contributed to the recognition of interdependencies, distribution of leadership and development of mutual understanding and trust. Shared motivation benefitted from a vision of patient-centred care but was hindered by top-down communication vehicles that did not allow regional priorities to filter upwards to central level. Between care providers in different settings, trust and candidacy were identified as mechanisms important to shared motivation, though network actions did not sufficiently support trust across care settings, or even between members of the same profession. Candidacy issues hindered family physician participation in cancer network structures that mirrored ongoing difficulties to including them in cancer care practice. Institutional arrangements were important drivers of capacity for joint action in the network. Common indicators were recognized as important to generating efforts towards common goals; however, questions around their validity reduced their contribution to capacities for joint action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite favorable starting conditions from the national cancer program and its central leadership promoting collaborative governance, tensions that emerge through the pursuit of network integration limit the transition to a more collaborative practice. Taking the time to work out these tensions as integration proceeds in waves appears essential to arrive at a governance model that is appropriate and acceptable for all network m
目标:网络(多个组织或行动者为实现共同目标而协调活动)已在一些国家的癌症计划中得到推广。但是,关于这些网络是否以及如何克服专业领域中普遍存在的各自为政的运作方式,却鲜有实证证据。本研究探讨了在一个规定的国家癌症项目中,如何通过合作治理来支持基于网络的综合实践:对加拿大魁北克癌症网络进行了一项纵向定性单一案例研究。数据收集于 2018-2020 年,通过对参与地区和/或国家癌症网络结构的利益相关者(n = 37)进行半结构化访谈,以及对国家和地区层面产生的文件(n = 45)进行回顾。实地工作期间和之后的归纳式专题分析以 Emerson 的合作治理框架为基础。其目的是确定协作治理机制(有原则的参与、共同的动机和联合行动的能力)是如何在网络中被激活的,以及它们对将国家癌症计划转化为基于网络的护理点实践的贡献:结果:国家和地区层面的跨学科委员会、实践社区和轨迹发展工作推动了有原则的参与。这些授权机构支持知识交流,促进了对相互依存关系的认识、领导权的分配以及相互理解和信任的发展。共同的动力得益于以病人为中心的护理愿景,但却受到自上而下的沟通工具的阻碍,这些工具无法将地区的优先事项向上传递到中央一级。在不同医疗机构的医疗服务提供者之间,信任和候选资格被认为是共同动力的重要机制,尽管网络行动并不能充分支持跨医疗机构的信任,甚至是同一行业成员之间的信任。候选资格问题阻碍了家庭医生参与癌症网络结构,这也反映了将家庭医生纳入癌症护理实践中一直存在的困难。机构安排是网络联合行动能力的重要驱动力。共同指标被认为对促进实现共同目标非常重要;然而,有关其有效性的问题削弱了其对联合行动能力的贡献:结论:尽管国家癌症计划及其中央领导层为促进合作治理提供了有利的启动条件,但在追求网络整合的过程中出现的紧张局势限制了向更具合作性的实践过渡。在一波一波的整合过程中,花时间解决这些紧张关系,对于达成一种适合所有网络成员并为其所接受的治理模式似乎至关重要。
{"title":"The role of collaborative governance in translating national cancer programs into network-based practices: A longitudinal case study in Canada.","authors":"Dominique Tremblay, Susan Usher, Karine Bilodeau, Nassera Touati","doi":"10.1177/13558196241300109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241300109","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;Networks (multiple organizations or actors coordinating their activities towards a common goal) have been promoted in the cancer programs of a number of countries. But there is little empirical evidence on whether and how they overcome the siloed functioning endemic in specialized domains. This study examines how collaborative governance takes shape to support integrated network-based practices within a prescribed national cancer program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;A longitudinal qualitative single-case study was conducted of the Quebec cancer network in Canada. Data were collected in 2018-2020 through semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 37) involved in regional and/or national cancer network structures and a review of documents (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 45) generated at national and regional level. Abductive thematic analysis during and post-field work was based on Emerson's collaborative governance framework. It aimed to identify how collaborative governance mechanisms (principled engagement, shared motivation and capacity for joint action) were activated in the network, and their contribution to translating a national cancer program into network-based practices at the point of care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Principled engagement was driven through interdisciplinary committees at national and regional level, communities of practice and trajectory-development efforts. These mandated structures supported knowledge exchange and contributed to the recognition of interdependencies, distribution of leadership and development of mutual understanding and trust. Shared motivation benefitted from a vision of patient-centred care but was hindered by top-down communication vehicles that did not allow regional priorities to filter upwards to central level. Between care providers in different settings, trust and candidacy were identified as mechanisms important to shared motivation, though network actions did not sufficiently support trust across care settings, or even between members of the same profession. Candidacy issues hindered family physician participation in cancer network structures that mirrored ongoing difficulties to including them in cancer care practice. Institutional arrangements were important drivers of capacity for joint action in the network. Common indicators were recognized as important to generating efforts towards common goals; however, questions around their validity reduced their contribution to capacities for joint action.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Despite favorable starting conditions from the national cancer program and its central leadership promoting collaborative governance, tensions that emerge through the pursuit of network integration limit the transition to a more collaborative practice. Taking the time to work out these tensions as integration proceeds in waves appears essential to arrive at a governance model that is appropriate and acceptable for all network m","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241300109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142644240","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch. 专业调查机构如何为患者安全的全系统学习提供信息?英国医疗安全调查分支机构成立初期的定性研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241291816
Amanda Crompton, Justin Waring, Carl Macrae, Charlotte Overton, Rosie Benneyworth

Objectives: System-wide learning for patient safety is a core challenge for the health care sector, despite the prevalence of localised reporting and learning approaches. There is growing interest in how health care services could emulate other safety-critical sectors with the introduction of specialist safety investigation agencies to inform sector-wide safety. This paper reports on a study of the introduction and early operation of one such agency in the English health and care system.

Methods: This was a qualitative interview study carried out between 2019 and 2021 and co-designed through a partnership between University researchers and the Executive Team from the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) to explore the organisational development of this 'first of type' organisation. The study involved interviews with 33 internal and external stakeholders and documentary analysis of HSIB reports.

Results: The study findings highlight the organisational competencies and developmental challenges experienced in the early years of HSIB operations focusing on (i) independence and fit within the wider system; (ii) the selection and scope of investigations; (iii) the methodology and investigation approach; and (iv) the skill and competencies of investigators.

Conclusions: This study offers practical learning to health care decision-makers about the importance of securing independence and integration, about the production of system-wide learning, the standardisation of robust methodologies and the support for a multidisciplinary specialist workforce.

目标:尽管普遍采用本地化的报告和学习方法,但全系统的患者安全学习是医疗保健部门面临的核心挑战。越来越多的人开始关注医疗服务部门如何效仿其他对安全至关重要的部门,引入专门的安全调查机构,为整个部门的安全提供信息。本文报告了对英国医疗保健系统引入此类机构及其早期运作的研究:这是一项在 2019 年至 2021 年期间开展的定性访谈研究,由大学研究人员与医疗保健安全调查处(HSIB)执行团队合作共同设计,旨在探索这一 "首创 "机构的组织发展。研究涉及对 33 名内部和外部利益相关者的访谈,以及对 HSIB 报告的文件分析:研究结果:研究结果突显了人调局在运营初期所经历的组织能力和发展挑战,重点是:(i) 独立性和在更广泛系统中的适应性;(ii) 调查的选择和范围;(iii) 调查方法和调查方式;以及 (iv) 调查人员的技能和能力:这项研究为医疗决策者提供了实用的学习方法,使他们认识到确保独立性和整合性的重要性、全系统学习的产生、稳健方法的标准化以及对多学科专家队伍的支持。
{"title":"How can specialist investigation agencies inform system-wide learning for patient safety? A qualitative study of perspectives on the early years of the English healthcare safety investigation branch.","authors":"Amanda Crompton, Justin Waring, Carl Macrae, Charlotte Overton, Rosie Benneyworth","doi":"10.1177/13558196241291816","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241291816","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>System-wide learning for patient safety is a core challenge for the health care sector, despite the prevalence of localised reporting and learning approaches. There is growing interest in how health care services could emulate other safety-critical sectors with the introduction of specialist safety investigation agencies to inform sector-wide safety. This paper reports on a study of the introduction and early operation of one such agency in the English health and care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative interview study carried out between 2019 and 2021 and co-designed through a partnership between University researchers and the Executive Team from the Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) to explore the organisational development of this 'first of type' organisation. The study involved interviews with 33 internal and external stakeholders and documentary analysis of HSIB reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study findings highlight the organisational competencies and developmental challenges experienced in the early years of HSIB operations focusing on (i) independence and fit within the wider system; (ii) the selection and scope of investigations; (iii) the methodology and investigation approach; and (iv) the skill and competencies of investigators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study offers practical learning to health care decision-makers about the importance of securing independence and integration, about the production of system-wide learning, the standardisation of robust methodologies and the support for a multidisciplinary specialist workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241291816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142583411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What can the era of big data and big data analytics mean for health services research? 大数据和大数据分析时代对医疗服务研究意味着什么?
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241295970
David Cromwell
{"title":"What can the era of big data and big data analytics mean for health services research?","authors":"David Cromwell","doi":"10.1177/13558196241295970","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241295970","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241295970"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142558049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts. 全科医生与社区药房之间的合作与整合工作:对在哪些情况下对哪些人有效的现实主义审查。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241290923
Emily Owen-Boukra, Ziyue Cai, Claire Duddy, Nina Fudge, Julia Hamer-Hunt, Fran Husson, Kamal R Mahtani, Margaret Ogden, Deborah Swinglehurst, Malcolm Turner, Cate Whittlesea, Geoff Wong, Sophie Park

Objectives: Collaborative and integrated (C + I) working between general practice and community pharmacies has the potential to increase accessibility to services, improve service efficiency and quality of care, and reduce health care expenditures. Many existing studies report challenges and complexities inherent in establishing effective C + I ways of working. The aim of our review is to understand how, when and why working arrangements between General Practitioners (GP) and Community Pharmacists (CP) can provide the conditions necessary for effective communication, decision-making, and C + I working.

Methods: We conducted a realist review to explore the key contextual factors and mechanisms through which GP-CP C + I working may be achieved. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Web of Science, IBSS, ASSIA, Sociological Abstracts, Sociology Database and the King's Fund Library Database were searched for articles and grey literature published between January 2000 and April 2022.

Results: A total of 136 documents were included in the final synthesis. Our findings highlight the importance of mutually beneficial remuneration models to support effective integration of services; supportive organisational cultures and values; flexible and agile IT systems/technologies; adequate physical infrastructure and space design to support multidisciplinary teamworking; the importance of establishing patient's trust in collaborative processes between GP-CP; and the need to acknowledge, support and utilise effective triadic relationships.

Conclusions: Our research generates new insights regarding how, why and in which contexts C + I working can be achieved between GPs and CPs. The findings of our review can be used to inform future policy, research and clinical practice guidelines for designing and delivering C + I care.

目标:全科医生和社区药房之间的合作与整合(C + I)工作有可能增加服务的可及性,提高服务效率和医疗质量,并减少医疗开支。现有的许多研究都报告了在建立有效的 C + I 工作方式时所面临的挑战和固有的复杂性。我们的研究旨在了解全科医生(GP)和社区药剂师(CP)之间的工作安排如何、何时以及为何能够为有效沟通、决策和 C + I 工作提供必要条件:我们开展了一项现实主义研究,以探索实现全科医生与社区药师之间 "C + I "工作的关键背景因素和机制。我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO、HMIC、Web of Science、IBSS、ASSIA、Sociological Abstracts、Sociology Database 和 King's Fund Library Database 在 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 4 月期间发表的文章和灰色文献:共有 136 篇文献被纳入最终综述。我们的研究结果强调了互惠互利的薪酬模式对支持有效整合服务的重要性;支持性的组织文化和价值观;灵活敏捷的信息技术系统/技术;支持多学科团队工作的适当的物理基础设施和空间设计;在全科医生-门诊医生之间的合作过程中建立患者信任的重要性;以及承认、支持和利用有效的三方关系的必要性:我们的研究为全科医生和社区医生之间如何、为何以及在何种情况下实现 "C + I "工作提供了新的见解。我们的研究结果可为未来设计和提供 C + I 护理的政策、研究和临床实践指南提供参考。
{"title":"Collaborative and integrated working between general practice and community pharmacies: A realist review of what works, for whom, and in which contexts.","authors":"Emily Owen-Boukra, Ziyue Cai, Claire Duddy, Nina Fudge, Julia Hamer-Hunt, Fran Husson, Kamal R Mahtani, Margaret Ogden, Deborah Swinglehurst, Malcolm Turner, Cate Whittlesea, Geoff Wong, Sophie Park","doi":"10.1177/13558196241290923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241290923","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Collaborative and integrated (C + I) working between general practice and community pharmacies has the potential to increase accessibility to services, improve service efficiency and quality of care, and reduce health care expenditures. Many existing studies report challenges and complexities inherent in establishing effective C + I ways of working. The aim of our review is to understand how, when and why working arrangements between General Practitioners (GP) and Community Pharmacists (CP) can provide the conditions necessary for effective communication, decision-making, and C + I working.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a realist review to explore the key contextual factors and mechanisms through which GP-CP C + I working may be achieved. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, HMIC, Web of Science, IBSS, ASSIA, Sociological Abstracts, Sociology Database and the King's Fund Library Database were searched for articles and grey literature published between January 2000 and April 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 documents were included in the final synthesis. Our findings highlight the importance of mutually beneficial remuneration models to support effective integration of services; supportive organisational cultures and values; flexible and agile IT systems/technologies; adequate physical infrastructure and space design to support multidisciplinary teamworking; the importance of establishing patient's trust in collaborative processes between GP-CP; and the need to acknowledge, support and utilise effective triadic relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research generates new insights regarding how, why and in which contexts C + I working can be achieved between GPs and CPs. The findings of our review can be used to inform future policy, research and clinical practice guidelines for designing and delivering C + I care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241290923"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142501990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Public perspectives on the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening: A systematic review and mixed-method integrative synthesis. 公众对肺癌筛查利弊的看法:系统综述和混合方法综合。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241288984
Manisha Pahwa, Alexandra Cernat, Julia Abelson, Paul A Demers, Lisa Schwartz, Katrina Shen, Mehreen Chowdhury, Caroline Higgins, Meredith Vanstone

Objective: Screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography aims to reduce lung cancer mortality, but there is a lack of knowledge about how target populations consider its potential benefits and harms.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of primary empirical studies published in any jurisdiction since 2002 using an integrative meta-synthesis technique. We searched six health and social science databases. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and potentially eligible full-text studies. Quantitative assessments and open-ended perspectives on benefits and harms were extracted and convergently integrated at analysis using a narrative approach. Study quality was assessed.

Results: The review included 26 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 5 mixed methods studies. Study quality was acceptable. Lung cancer screening was widely perceived to be personally beneficial for early detection and reassurance. Radiation exposure and screening accuracy were recognised as harms, but these were frequently considered to be justified by early detection of lung cancer. Stigma, anxiety, and fear related to screening procedures and results were pervasive among current smokers. People with low incomes reported not participating in screening because of potential out-of-pocket costs and geographic access.

Conclusions: Populations targeted for lung cancer screening tended to consider screening as personally beneficial and rationalised physical, but not psychological, harms. Screening programmes should be clear about benefits, use non-stigmatising design, and consider equity as a guiding principle.

目的使用低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查肺癌的目的是降低肺癌死亡率,但对于目标人群如何看待其潜在的益处和害处却缺乏了解:我们采用综合荟萃技术,对 2002 年以来在任何司法管辖区发表的主要实证研究进行了系统性回顾。我们检索了六个健康和社会科学数据库。两名审稿人独立筛选了标题、摘要和可能符合条件的全文研究。我们提取了定量评估和关于益处和害处的开放式观点,并在分析时采用叙事方法进行整合。对研究质量进行了评估:综述包括 26 项定量研究、18 项定性研究和 5 项混合方法研究。研究质量尚可。人们普遍认为肺癌筛查对早期发现和保证个人健康有益。辐射暴露和筛查准确性被认为是有害的,但人们经常认为早期发现肺癌是合理的。与筛查程序和结果相关的耻辱感、焦虑和恐惧在当前吸烟者中普遍存在。低收入人群表示,由于潜在的自付费用和地理位置原因,他们没有参加筛查:结论:肺癌筛查的目标人群倾向于认为筛查对个人有益,并将身体上的危害合理化,而非心理上的危害。筛查计划应明确筛查的益处,采用非污名化的设计,并将公平作为指导原则。
{"title":"Public perspectives on the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening: A systematic review and mixed-method integrative synthesis.","authors":"Manisha Pahwa, Alexandra Cernat, Julia Abelson, Paul A Demers, Lisa Schwartz, Katrina Shen, Mehreen Chowdhury, Caroline Higgins, Meredith Vanstone","doi":"10.1177/13558196241288984","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241288984","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Screening for lung cancer with low dose computed tomography aims to reduce lung cancer mortality, but there is a lack of knowledge about how target populations consider its potential benefits and harms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of primary empirical studies published in any jurisdiction since 2002 using an integrative meta-synthesis technique. We searched six health and social science databases. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and potentially eligible full-text studies. Quantitative assessments and open-ended perspectives on benefits and harms were extracted and convergently integrated at analysis using a narrative approach. Study quality was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 26 quantitative, 18 qualitative, and 5 mixed methods studies. Study quality was acceptable. Lung cancer screening was widely perceived to be personally beneficial for early detection and reassurance. Radiation exposure and screening accuracy were recognised as harms, but these were frequently considered to be justified by early detection of lung cancer. Stigma, anxiety, and fear related to screening procedures and results were pervasive among current smokers. People with low incomes reported not participating in screening because of potential out-of-pocket costs and geographic access.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Populations targeted for lung cancer screening tended to consider screening as personally beneficial and rationalised physical, but not psychological, harms. Screening programmes should be clear about benefits, use non-stigmatising design, and consider equity as a guiding principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241288984"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142467442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Identifying potentially low value surgical care: A national ecological study in England. 识别潜在的低价值外科护理:英格兰全国生态研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241252053
Tim Jones, Angus McNair, Hugh McLeod, Josie Morley, Leila Rooshenas, William Hollingworth

Objectives: High variation in clinical practice may indicate uncertainty and potentially low-value care. Methods to identify low value care are often not well defined or transparent and can be time intensive. In this paper we explore the usefulness of variation analysis of routinely-collected data about surgical procedures in England to identify potentially low-value surgical care.

Methods: This is a national ecological study using Hospital Episode Statistics linked to mid-year population estimates and indices of multiple deprivation in England, 2014/15-2018/19. We identified the top 5% of surgical procedures in terms of growth in standardised procedure rates for 2014/15 to 2018/19 and variation in procedure rates between clinical commissioning groups as measured by the systematic component of variance (SCV). A targeted literature review was conducted to explore the evidence for each of the identified techniques. Procedures without evidence of cost-effectiveness were viewed as of potentially low value.

Results: We identified six surgical procedures that had a high growth rate of 37% or more over 5 years, and four with higher geographical variation (SCV >1.6). There was evidence for two of the 10 procedures that surgery was more cost-effective than non-surgical treatment albeit with uncertainty around optimal surgical technique. The evidence base for eight procedures was less clear cut, with uncertainty around clinical- and/or cost-effectiveness. These were: deep brain stimulation; removing the prostate; surgical spine procedures; a procedure to alleviate pain in the spine; surgery for dislocated joints due to trauma and associated surgery for traumatic fractures; hip joint replacement with cemented pelvic component or cemented femoral component; and shoulder joint replacement.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that variation analysis could be regularly used to identify potentially low-value procedures. This can provide important insights into optimising services and the potential de-adoption of costly interventions and treatments that do not benefit patients and the health system more widely. Early identification of potentially low value care can inform prioritisation of clinical trials to generate evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness before treatments become established in clinical practice.

目的:临床实践中的高度差异可能预示着不确定性和潜在的低价值护理。识别低价值医疗的方法通常定义不清或不透明,而且可能需要耗费大量时间。在本文中,我们探讨了对常规收集的英格兰外科手术数据进行变异分析以识别潜在低价值外科护理的实用性:这是一项全国性的生态研究,使用的是与英格兰 2014/15-2018/19 年年中人口估计值和多重贫困指数相关联的医院病例统计数据。我们确定了2014/15年至2018/19年标准化手术率增长最高的5%的外科手术,以及根据系统性差异成分(SCV)衡量的临床委托组之间手术率的差异。我们进行了有针对性的文献综述,以探索每种已确定技术的证据。没有成本效益证据的手术被视为潜在价值较低:我们发现有六种外科手术在 5 年内增长率高达 37% 或以上,其中四种手术的地域差异较大(SCV >1.6)。在这 10 项手术中,有两项手术的证据表明,手术比非手术治疗更具成本效益,但最佳手术技术尚不确定。八项手术的证据基础不那么明确,临床和/或成本效益方面存在不确定性。这些手术包括:脑深部刺激术;前列腺切除术;脊柱外科手术;缓解脊柱疼痛的手术;外伤导致的关节脱位手术和外伤性骨折的相关手术;骨盆骨水泥或股骨骨水泥髋关节置换术;以及肩关节置换术:这项研究表明,变异分析可定期用于识别潜在的低价值手术。这可以为优化服务提供重要启示,并有可能取消对患者和医疗系统无益的昂贵干预和治疗。及早识别潜在的低价值护理可为临床试验的优先顺序提供依据,从而在治疗方法在临床实践中确立之前,为有效性和成本效益提供证据。
{"title":"Identifying potentially low value surgical care: A national ecological study in England.","authors":"Tim Jones, Angus McNair, Hugh McLeod, Josie Morley, Leila Rooshenas, William Hollingworth","doi":"10.1177/13558196241252053","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196241252053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>High variation in clinical practice may indicate uncertainty and potentially low-value care. Methods to identify low value care are often not well defined or transparent and can be time intensive. In this paper we explore the usefulness of variation analysis of routinely-collected data about surgical procedures in England to identify potentially low-value surgical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a national ecological study using Hospital Episode Statistics linked to mid-year population estimates and indices of multiple deprivation in England, 2014/15-2018/19. We identified the top 5% of surgical procedures in terms of growth in standardised procedure rates for 2014/15 to 2018/19 and variation in procedure rates between clinical commissioning groups as measured by the systematic component of variance (SCV). A targeted literature review was conducted to explore the evidence for each of the identified techniques. Procedures without evidence of cost-effectiveness were viewed as of potentially low value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified six surgical procedures that had a high growth rate of 37% or more over 5 years, and four with higher geographical variation (SCV >1.6). There was evidence for two of the 10 procedures that surgery was more cost-effective than non-surgical treatment albeit with uncertainty around optimal surgical technique. The evidence base for eight procedures was less clear cut, with uncertainty around clinical- and/or cost-effectiveness. These were: deep brain stimulation; removing the prostate; surgical spine procedures; a procedure to alleviate pain in the spine; surgery for dislocated joints due to trauma and associated surgery for traumatic fractures; hip joint replacement with cemented pelvic component or cemented femoral component; and shoulder joint replacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that variation analysis could be regularly used to identify potentially low-value procedures. This can provide important insights into optimising services and the potential de-adoption of costly interventions and treatments that do not benefit patients and the health system more widely. Early identification of potentially low value care can inform prioritisation of clinical trials to generate evidence on effectiveness and cost-effectiveness before treatments become established in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346124/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140898580","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
'You never know when you will need an antibiotic': A qualitative study of structural barriers and cultural assumptions in antibiotic misuse among immigrants in the United States. 你永远不知道什么时候会需要抗生素":对美国移民滥用抗生素的结构性障碍和文化假设的定性研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241252748
Sara Imanpour, Darcy Jones McMaughan

Objectives: The use of nonprescribed antibiotics increases the risk of antibiotic resistance, which is a primary public health concern of the 21st century. This study explores structural and cultural determinants of antibiotic misuse among immigrants living in the United States who arrived from home countries with easier access to antibiotics.

Methods: Adopting a qualitative approach, we interviewed 34 immigrants living in the United States and who had traveled back to their home countries within 1 year of the interview. We followed the steps of constructive grounded theory to analyze the data.

Results: We found two primary influences of immigrants' use of nonprescribed antibiotics. The first was structural barriers to health care access in the host country, including insurance coverage, cost of an emergency department visit, cost of missing a paid day of work, complexity of the healthcare system, and communication issues with health care providers. The second was participants' cultural assumptions, including their experiences of antibiotics use, beliefs about antibiotics, a habit of self-medication, and uncertainty about future medical needs.

Conclusions: This study informs policymakers concerned with combating antibiotic resistance. Promoting antibiotic stewardship among immigrants from countries with lax antibiotic-prescribing practices and improving access to appropriate channels for preventative and same-day care may reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics.

目标:非处方抗生素的使用会增加抗生素耐药性的风险,而这正是 21 世纪公共卫生的首要问题。本研究探讨了居住在美国的移民滥用抗生素的结构和文化决定因素,这些移民来自更容易获得抗生素的祖国:采用定性方法,我们采访了 34 名居住在美国的移民,他们在接受采访后一年内曾回国。我们按照建设性基础理论的步骤对数据进行了分析:我们发现移民使用非处方抗生素有两个主要影响因素。首先是东道国医疗服务的结构性障碍,包括保险范围、急诊室就诊费用、错过一天带薪工作的费用、医疗系统的复杂性以及与医疗服务提供者的沟通问题。其次是参与者的文化假设,包括他们使用抗生素的经历、对抗生素的看法、自我药疗的习惯以及对未来医疗需求的不确定性:本研究为关注抗生素耐药性问题的政策制定者提供了参考。向来自抗生素处方宽松国家的移民宣传抗生素管理知识,改善他们获得预防性治疗和当天治疗的适当渠道,可以减少抗生素的不当使用。
{"title":"'You never know when you will need an antibiotic': A qualitative study of structural barriers and cultural assumptions in antibiotic misuse among immigrants in the United States.","authors":"Sara Imanpour, Darcy Jones McMaughan","doi":"10.1177/13558196241252748","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196241252748","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The use of nonprescribed antibiotics increases the risk of antibiotic resistance, which is a primary public health concern of the 21st century. This study explores structural and cultural determinants of antibiotic misuse among immigrants living in the United States who arrived from home countries with easier access to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adopting a qualitative approach, we interviewed 34 immigrants living in the United States and who had traveled back to their home countries within 1 year of the interview. We followed the steps of constructive grounded theory to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found two primary influences of immigrants' use of nonprescribed antibiotics. The first was structural barriers to health care access in the host country, including insurance coverage, cost of an emergency department visit, cost of missing a paid day of work, complexity of the healthcare system, and communication issues with health care providers. The second was participants' cultural assumptions, including their experiences of antibiotics use, beliefs about antibiotics, a habit of self-medication, and uncertainty about future medical needs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study informs policymakers concerned with combating antibiotic resistance. Promoting antibiotic stewardship among immigrants from countries with lax antibiotic-prescribing practices and improving access to appropriate channels for preventative and same-day care may reduce the inappropriate use of antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"266-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140898584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
University students' access to mental health services: A qualitative study of the experiences of health service professionals through the lens of candidacy in England. 大学生获得心理健康服务的情况:通过英国候选资格的视角对医疗服务专业人员的经验进行定性研究。
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-27 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241235877
Tom G Osborn, Rosa Town, Majeed Bawendi, Emily Stapley, Rob Saunders, Peter Fonagy

Objectives: In order to develop a better understanding of students' access to mental health services, we explored the experiences of health care professionals interacting with university students with mental health problems.

Methods: We interviewed 23 professionals working across university advice and counselling services, NHS general practice, crisis, and psychological services in North and East London between June 2022 and January 2023. Our approach drew on reflexive thematic analysis and the principles of abductive analysis. The notion of candidacy - that is, how different needs are deemed deserving of health service attention - was particularly helpful to our understanding of the ongoing phenomenon of interest in the data.

Results: Each student's access to mental health support was highly contingent on the student's dynamic social context and the pressures and organisation of the local health system. Professionals described how different students viewed different needs as deserving of health service attention. Which students reached the professional's service depended on the resources and relationships a student could draw upon, and the service's relative permeability. Once there, what action professionals took was strongly influenced by the professional's service expertise, resource constraints, the relationships the professional's service had with other organisations, the students' wishes, and whether students regarded treatment offers as acceptable.

Conclusions: Candidacy offers a useful lens to view university students' access to mental health support. Access appears to be an increasingly intricate task for students, given the fragmented service landscape, surging demand for mental health care and challenges of emerging adulthood. Our findings suggest that policy goals to increase use of mental health services are unlikely to improve outcomes for students without policy makers and health systems giving holistic consideration of inter-service relationships and available resources.

目的为了更好地了解学生获得心理健康服务的情况,我们探讨了医护人员与有心理健康问题的大学生互动的经验:我们在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 1 月期间采访了 23 位专业人士,他们分别在伦敦北部和东部的大学咨询和辅导服务机构、国家医疗服务体系全科诊所、危机处理和心理服务机构工作。我们的方法借鉴了反思性主题分析和归纳分析的原则。候选资格的概念--即不同的需求如何被认为值得医疗服务机构关注--特别有助于我们理解数据中的持续关注现象:结果:每个学生能否获得心理健康支持在很大程度上取决于学生所处的动态社会环境以及当地医疗系统的压力和组织结构。专业人员描述了不同的学生是如何将不同的需求视为值得医疗服务关注的。哪些学生可以得到专业人员的服务,取决于学生可以利用的资源和关系,以及服务的相对渗透性。一旦到达那里,专业人员所采取的行动受到以下因素的强烈影响:专业人员的服务专长、资源限制、专业人员的服务与其他组织的关系、学生的意愿以及学生是否认为治疗方案是可以接受的:候选资格为大学生获得心理健康支持提供了一个有用的视角。对学生来说,获取心理健康支持似乎是一项越来越复杂的任务,因为他们面临的服务环境支离破碎,对心理健康护理的需求激增,以及成年后所面临的挑战。我们的研究结果表明,如果政策制定者和卫生系统不全面考虑服务间的关系和可用资源,那么提高心理健康服务使用率的政策目标就不可能改善学生的结果。
{"title":"University students' access to mental health services: A qualitative study of the experiences of health service professionals through the lens of candidacy in England.","authors":"Tom G Osborn, Rosa Town, Majeed Bawendi, Emily Stapley, Rob Saunders, Peter Fonagy","doi":"10.1177/13558196241235877","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196241235877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In order to develop a better understanding of students' access to mental health services, we explored the experiences of health care professionals interacting with university students with mental health problems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 23 professionals working across university advice and counselling services, NHS general practice, crisis, and psychological services in North and East London between June 2022 and January 2023. Our approach drew on reflexive thematic analysis and the principles of abductive analysis. The notion of candidacy - that is, how different needs are deemed deserving of health service attention - was particularly helpful to our understanding of the ongoing phenomenon of interest in the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each student's access to mental health support was highly contingent on the student's dynamic social context and the pressures and organisation of the local health system. Professionals described how different students viewed different needs as deserving of health service attention. Which students reached the professional's service depended on the resources and relationships a student could draw upon, and the service's relative permeability. Once there, what action professionals took was strongly influenced by the professional's service expertise, resource constraints, the relationships the professional's service had with other organisations, the students' wishes, and whether students regarded treatment offers as acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Candidacy offers a useful lens to view university students' access to mental health support. Access appears to be an increasingly intricate task for students, given the fragmented service landscape, surging demand for mental health care and challenges of emerging adulthood. Our findings suggest that policy goals to increase use of mental health services are unlikely to improve outcomes for students without policy makers and health systems giving holistic consideration of inter-service relationships and available resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"230-239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346130/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139983102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health-related inequalities in out-of-pocket expenditure under universal health coverage in Taiwan: A cross-sectional decomposition analysis. 台湾全民健保下自费支出中与健康相关的不平等:横截面分解分析
IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI: 10.1177/13558196241251626
Miaw-Chwen Lee, Christy Pu

Objectives: Studies have investigated income-related inequality in out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on health care but less is known about health-related inequality of OOPE distribution. This study analysed the relationship between health-related inequality and OOPE and the factors contributing to OOPE inequality in Taiwan.

Methods: We developed a household OOPE questionnaire and conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of households in Taiwan between January and August 2022, using two-stage probability proportional-to-size sampling based on a national address registry in Taiwan. We calculated a concentration index to determine OOPE inequality in health. We then identified factors contributing to OOPE inequality in health distribution by performing a decomposition analysis.

Results: A total of 657 people responded to the survey (81.4% response rate). The two largest categories of OOPE were spending on curative care and on medical goods and pharmaceuticals, with concentration indices of -0.265 (p < .001), -0.272 (p = .006) and -0.227 (p = .003), respectively, indicating that the OOPE burden fell disproportionately on people with poor health. Socioeconomic status explained significant proportions of inequality in total, curative and medical goods and pharmaceuticals OOPE. Utilisation of health care increased the OOPE burden among people with poor health while having private health insurance worked in the opposite direction.

Conclusion: In Taiwan, people in poor health faced a disproportionately high OOPE burden, indicating that the National Health Insurance scheme may not meet their needs for health care. There is a need for policies to take account of the different factors affecting health inequalities in OOPE in order to enhance equity in Taiwan's universal health system.

目的:已有研究调查了与收入相关的医疗自付支出(OOPE)不平等现象,但对与健康相关的OOPE分布不平等现象却知之甚少。本研究分析了台湾地区与健康相关的不平等与 OOPE 之间的关系,以及导致 OOPE 不平等的因素:方法:我们编制了一份家庭 OOPE 问卷,并于 2022 年 1 月至 8 月期间对台湾的家庭进行了一次具有全国代表性的横断面调查,调查采用了基于台湾全国地址登记的两阶段概率比例抽样法。我们计算了集中指数,以确定 OOPE 在健康方面的不平等。然后,我们通过分解分析确定了造成 OOPE 健康分布不平等的因素:共有 657 人回复了调查(回复率为 81.4%)。OOPE中最大的两类支出是治疗护理支出和医疗用品及药品支出,集中指数分别为-0.265 (p < .001)、-0.272 (p = .006) 和-0.227 (p=.003),这表明OOPE的负担不成比例地落在了健康状况不佳的人群身上。社会经济地位解释了总OOPE、治疗和医疗用品及药品OOPE中相当大比例的不平等。医疗保健的使用增加了健康状况不佳者的 OOPE 负担,而拥有私人医疗保险则相反:结论:在台湾,健康状况不佳的人群面临着过高的 OOPE 负担,这表明国民健康保险计划可能无法满足他们对医疗保健的需求。有必要在政策中考虑到影响 OOPE 健康不平等的不同因素,以提高台湾全民健康体系的公平性。
{"title":"Health-related inequalities in out-of-pocket expenditure under universal health coverage in Taiwan: A cross-sectional decomposition analysis.","authors":"Miaw-Chwen Lee, Christy Pu","doi":"10.1177/13558196241251626","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13558196241251626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies have investigated income-related inequality in out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on health care but less is known about health-related inequality of OOPE distribution. This study analysed the relationship between health-related inequality and OOPE and the factors contributing to OOPE inequality in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a household OOPE questionnaire and conducted a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of households in Taiwan between January and August 2022, using two-stage probability proportional-to-size sampling based on a national address registry in Taiwan. We calculated a concentration index to determine OOPE inequality in health. We then identified factors contributing to OOPE inequality in health distribution by performing a decomposition analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 657 people responded to the survey (81.4% response rate). The two largest categories of OOPE were spending on curative care and on medical goods and pharmaceuticals, with concentration indices of -0.265 (<i>p</i> < .001), -0.272 (<i>p</i> = .006) and -0.227 (<i>p</i> = .003), respectively, indicating that the OOPE burden fell disproportionately on people with poor health. Socioeconomic status explained significant proportions of inequality in total, curative and medical goods and pharmaceuticals OOPE. Utilisation of health care increased the OOPE burden among people with poor health while having private health insurance worked in the opposite direction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Taiwan, people in poor health faced a disproportionately high OOPE burden, indicating that the National Health Insurance scheme may not meet their needs for health care. There is a need for policies to take account of the different factors affecting health inequalities in OOPE in order to enhance equity in Taiwan's universal health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"240-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140876625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1