Menopausal hormone therapy: assessing associations with breast and colorectal cancers by familial risk.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY JNCI Cancer Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkae121
Robert J MacInnis, Mark A Jenkins, Roger L Milne, Esther M John, Mary B Daly, Irene L Andrulis, Sarah V Colonna, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Loic Le Marchand, Polly A Newcomb, Amanda I Phipps, Stephanie L Schmit, Finlay A Macrae, Daniel D Buchanan, Steven Gallinger, Rish K Pai, Niloy J Samadder, Graham G Giles, Melissa C Southey, John L Hopper, Mary Beth Terry
{"title":"Menopausal hormone therapy: assessing associations with breast and colorectal cancers by familial risk.","authors":"Robert J MacInnis, Mark A Jenkins, Roger L Milne, Esther M John, Mary B Daly, Irene L Andrulis, Sarah V Colonna, Kelly-Anne Phillips, Loic Le Marchand, Polly A Newcomb, Amanda I Phipps, Stephanie L Schmit, Finlay A Macrae, Daniel D Buchanan, Steven Gallinger, Rish K Pai, Niloy J Samadder, Graham G Giles, Melissa C Southey, John L Hopper, Mary Beth Terry","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Menopausal users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are at increased breast cancer risk and decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk compared with individuals who have never used HRT, but these opposing associations may differ by familial risk of breast cancer and CRC. We harmonized data from 3 cohorts and generated separate breast cancer and CRC familial risk scores based on cancer family history. We defined moderate or strong family history as a risk score of 0.4 or higher, where 0.4 was equivalent to a 50-year-old woman with 1 parent diagnosed with either breast cancer or CRC at 55 years of age. Of 24 486 women assessed, 1243 and 405 were diagnosed with incident breast cancer and CRC, respectively. For breast cancer, menopausal HRT ever use versus never use hazard ratios were 1.27 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.45) for a breast cancer familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.25) for a breast cancer familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .08). For CRC, menopausal HRT hazard ratios were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.78) for a CRC familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.73 to 2.00) for a CRC familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .03). Associations with menopausal HRT use that apply to the general population may not hold for women at moderate or strong familial risk of these cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11700558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Menopausal users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are at increased breast cancer risk and decreased colorectal cancer (CRC) risk compared with individuals who have never used HRT, but these opposing associations may differ by familial risk of breast cancer and CRC. We harmonized data from 3 cohorts and generated separate breast cancer and CRC familial risk scores based on cancer family history. We defined moderate or strong family history as a risk score of 0.4 or higher, where 0.4 was equivalent to a 50-year-old woman with 1 parent diagnosed with either breast cancer or CRC at 55 years of age. Of 24 486 women assessed, 1243 and 405 were diagnosed with incident breast cancer and CRC, respectively. For breast cancer, menopausal HRT ever use versus never use hazard ratios were 1.27 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.45) for a breast cancer familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.01 (95% CI = 0.82 to 1.25) for a breast cancer familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .08). For CRC, menopausal HRT hazard ratios were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.50 to 0.78) for a CRC familial risk score below 0.4 and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.73 to 2.00) for a CRC familial risk score of 0.4 or higher (Pdifference = .03). Associations with menopausal HRT use that apply to the general population may not hold for women at moderate or strong familial risk of these cancers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绝经期激素治疗:通过家族风险评估与乳腺癌和结直肠癌的关系。
绝经期激素治疗(MHT)服用者与从未服用者相比,乳腺癌(BC)风险增加,结直肠癌(CRC)风险降低,但这些相反的关联可能因BC和CRC的家族风险而异。我们统一了来自三个队列的数据,并根据癌症家族史生成了单独的BC和CRC家族风险评分(FRS)。我们将中度/重度家族史定义为FRS≥0.4,其中0.4相当于父母一方在55岁时被诊断患有癌症的50岁女性。在24,486名女性中,分别有1,243名和405名被诊断为偶发性BC和CRC。对于BC, FRSBC的MHT风险比(hr)为1.27 (95%CI = 1.11-1.45)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisiting surrogacy of pathological complete response for long-term survival in triple negative breast cancer. Antibiotic treatment and survival in patients with resected, early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma receiving chemotherapy. Do trial benefits predict real-world gains in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. Prostate cancer screening in the Middle East and North Africa: a cross-sectional study on current practices. The use of large language models to enhance cancer clinical trial educational materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1