Negated actions are simulated within the primary motor cortex.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-26 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.018
W Dupont, C Papaxanthis, L Lurquin, F Lebon, C Madden-Lombardi
{"title":"Negated actions are simulated within the primary motor cortex.","authors":"W Dupont, C Papaxanthis, L Lurquin, F Lebon, C Madden-Lombardi","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Controversy persists regarding the representation of linguistically negated actions, specifically concerning activation and inhibitory mechanisms in the motor system, and whether negated action sentences evoke an initial motor simulation of the action to be negated. We conducted two experiments probing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the primary motor cortex at different latencies while reading affirmative and negative action sentences. In experiment one, twenty-six participants read action and non-action sentences in affirmative or negative forms. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we probed CSE in hand muscles at rest and at several latencies after verb presentation. We observed a greater CSE for action sentences compared to non-action sentences, regardless of verb form. In experiment two, nineteen participants read affirmative and negative action sentences. We measured CSE and SICI at short and long latencies after verb presentation. CSE was greater for affirmative and negative action sentences at both latencies compared to rest. SICI did not change at the short latency but increased at longer latencies, regardless of verb form. Negated action sentences showed the same motor excitability as affirmed action sentences with no additional inhibition at early latencies. These results lend support for the idea that actions to be negated are initially simulated within the motor system. Neural differences between affirmative and negative action sentences may occur outside the primary motor cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"468-478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.12.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Controversy persists regarding the representation of linguistically negated actions, specifically concerning activation and inhibitory mechanisms in the motor system, and whether negated action sentences evoke an initial motor simulation of the action to be negated. We conducted two experiments probing corticospinal excitability (CSE) and short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the primary motor cortex at different latencies while reading affirmative and negative action sentences. In experiment one, twenty-six participants read action and non-action sentences in affirmative or negative forms. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation, we probed CSE in hand muscles at rest and at several latencies after verb presentation. We observed a greater CSE for action sentences compared to non-action sentences, regardless of verb form. In experiment two, nineteen participants read affirmative and negative action sentences. We measured CSE and SICI at short and long latencies after verb presentation. CSE was greater for affirmative and negative action sentences at both latencies compared to rest. SICI did not change at the short latency but increased at longer latencies, regardless of verb form. Negated action sentences showed the same motor excitability as affirmed action sentences with no additional inhibition at early latencies. These results lend support for the idea that actions to be negated are initially simulated within the motor system. Neural differences between affirmative and negative action sentences may occur outside the primary motor cortex.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
否定行为在初级运动皮层中被模拟。
关于语言否定动作的表征,特别是关于运动系统的激活和抑制机制,以及否定动作句子是否会唤起被否定动作的初始运动模拟,一直存在争议。我们进行了两项实验,在阅读肯定和否定动作句子时,在不同的潜伏期探测初级运动皮层的皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)和皮质内短间隔抑制(SICI)。在实验一中,26 名参与者阅读了肯定或否定形式的动作和非动作句子。通过经颅磁刺激,我们检测了手部肌肉在静止时和动词出现后几个潜伏期的 CSE。我们观察到,与非动作句子相比,动作句子的 CSE 更大,与动词形式无关。在实验二中,19 名参与者阅读了肯定和否定的动作句子。我们在动词呈现后的短潜伏期和长潜伏期测量了 CSE 和 SICI。与静止句子相比,肯定和否定动作句子在两个潜伏期的 CSE 都更高。无论动词形式如何,SICI 在短潜伏期没有变化,但在长潜伏期有所增加。否定动作句与肯定动作句表现出相同的运动兴奋性,在早期潜伏期没有额外的抑制作用。这些结果支持了一种观点,即被否定的动作最初是在运动系统中模拟的。肯定和否定动作句之间的神经差异可能发生在初级运动皮层之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Effects of ascorbic acid on myelination in offspring of advanced maternal age. Repeated exposure to high-dose nicotine induces prefrontal gray matter atrophy in adolescent male rats. Bayesian brain theory: Computational neuroscience of belief. Effects and mechanisms of Apelin in treating central nervous system diseases. Neuroticism and cerebral small vessel disease: A genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1