ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 Provide Mostly Accurate Information When Answering Patients' Questions Relating to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Arthroscopic Hip Surgery.

David Slawaska-Eng, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Dan Cohen, Thierry Pauyo, Etienne L Belzile, Olufemi R Ayeni
{"title":"ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 Provide Mostly Accurate Information When Answering Patients' Questions Relating to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Arthroscopic Hip Surgery.","authors":"David Slawaska-Eng, Yoan Bourgeault-Gagnon, Dan Cohen, Thierry Pauyo, Etienne L Belzile, Olufemi R Ayeni","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering patient questions about femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and arthroscopic hip surgery, comparing the performance of versions ChatGPT-3.5 (free) and ChatGPT-4 (paid).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve frequently asked questions (FAQs) relating to FAI were selected and posed to ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. Responses were assessed for accuracy by three hip arthroscopy surgeons using a four-tier grading system. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Gwet's AC2 coefficient for interrater agreement corrected for chance and employing quadratic weights.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ratings for responses ranged from \"excellent not requiring clarification\" to \"satisfactory requiring moderate clarification.\" No responses were rated as \"unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification.\" Median accuracy scores were 2 (range 1-3) for ChatGPT-3.5 and 1.5 (range 1-3) for ChatGPT-4, with 25% of ChatGPT-3.5's responses and 50% of ChatGPT-4's responses rated as \"excellent.\" There was no statistical difference in performance between the two versions (p = 0.279) although ChatGPT-4 showed a tendency towards higher accuracy in some areas. Interrater agreement was substantial for ChatGPT-3.5 (Gwet's AC2 = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6 - 0.94]) and moderate to substantial for ChatGPT-4 (Gwet's AC2 = 0.65 [95%CI = 0.43 - 0.87]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both versions of ChatGPT provided mostly accurate responses to FAQs on FAI and arthroscopic surgery, with no significant difference between the versions. The findings suggest potential utility of ChatGPT in patient education, though cautious implementation and further evaluation are recommended due to variability in response accuracy and low power of the study.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT in answering patient questions about femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and arthroscopic hip surgery, comparing the performance of versions ChatGPT-3.5 (free) and ChatGPT-4 (paid).

Methods: Twelve frequently asked questions (FAQs) relating to FAI were selected and posed to ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4. Responses were assessed for accuracy by three hip arthroscopy surgeons using a four-tier grading system. Statistical analyses included Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Gwet's AC2 coefficient for interrater agreement corrected for chance and employing quadratic weights.

Results: Median ratings for responses ranged from "excellent not requiring clarification" to "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification." No responses were rated as "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification." Median accuracy scores were 2 (range 1-3) for ChatGPT-3.5 and 1.5 (range 1-3) for ChatGPT-4, with 25% of ChatGPT-3.5's responses and 50% of ChatGPT-4's responses rated as "excellent." There was no statistical difference in performance between the two versions (p = 0.279) although ChatGPT-4 showed a tendency towards higher accuracy in some areas. Interrater agreement was substantial for ChatGPT-3.5 (Gwet's AC2 = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6 - 0.94]) and moderate to substantial for ChatGPT-4 (Gwet's AC2 = 0.65 [95%CI = 0.43 - 0.87]).

Conclusion: Both versions of ChatGPT provided mostly accurate responses to FAQs on FAI and arthroscopic surgery, with no significant difference between the versions. The findings suggest potential utility of ChatGPT in patient education, though cautious implementation and further evaluation are recommended due to variability in response accuracy and low power of the study.

Level of evidence: IV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 3.5 和 4 在回答患者有关股骨髋臼撞击综合征和髋关节镜手术的问题时提供了基本准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
期刊最新文献
Radiofrequency Ablation of Terminal Sensory Articular Nerves Before Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery Improved Early Postoperative Functional Outcomes: A Pilot Study With 3 Months Follow-up. THE INCLUSION OF SEX AND GENDER IN RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, FUNDING, AND PUBLICATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Low rate of growth disturbance after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction or repair in skeletally immature patients: a systematic review. The Diagnostic Value of an Upright Chest Radiograph in Diagnosing Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation. ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 Provide Mostly Accurate Information When Answering Patients' Questions Relating to Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Arthroscopic Hip Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1