Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 24.1 1区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Lancet Planetary Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1
Spencer Lee, Derek Tian, Rose He, Jacquelyn J Cragg, Chris Carlsten, Amanda Giang, Prubjot K Gill, Kate M Johnson, Emily Brigham
{"title":"Ambient air pollution exposure and adult asthma incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Spencer Lee, Derek Tian, Rose He, Jacquelyn J Cragg, Chris Carlsten, Amanda Giang, Prubjot K Gill, Kate M Johnson, Emily Brigham","doi":"10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]<sub>2·5</sub>, nitrogen dioxide [NO<sub>2</sub>], ozone [O<sub>3</sub>], and sulphur dioxide [SO<sub>2</sub>]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM<sub>2·5</sub> (nine studies), NO<sub>2</sub> (nine studies), and O<sub>3</sub> (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2·5</sub> were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m<sup>3</sup> in NO<sub>2</sub> were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O<sub>3</sub> concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in O<sub>3</sub>, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I<sup>2</sup>=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO<sub>2</sub> estimate (95% CI -0·0077 to -0·0025 per μg/m<sup>3</sup>).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Exposure to increased ambient PM<sub>2·5</sub> or NO<sub>2</sub> might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O<sub>3</sub> and insufficient for SO<sub>2</sub>. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with aligned methodology and reporting.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":48548,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Planetary Health","volume":"8 12","pages":"e1065-e1078"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Planetary Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00279-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ambient (outdoor) air pollutant exposures have emerged as a plausible risk factor for incident childhood asthma. However, the effect of ambient air pollutant exposures on risk of incident adult asthma is unclear. We aimed to investigate associations between specific ambient air pollutants and the risk of incident adult asthma.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science from inception to Nov 27, 2023. We included observational studies with the outcome of new-onset asthma during adulthood (onset at ≥18 years), and metric of exposure of ambient air pollutants (particulate matter [PM]2·5, nitrogen dioxide [NO2], ozone [O3], and sulphur dioxide [SO2]). Study data were extracted independently by two reviewers and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. When four or more eligible studies were available for a given pollutant, we applied meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting in a random effects model to estimate pooled relative risk (RR), and used meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023420139.

Findings: Our search identified 1891 references. After excluding 651 (34%) duplicates and ineligible studies, we included 25 studies in the systematic review. After excluding studies with overlapping populations or reporting effect estimates that could not be pooled, we performed meta-analysis for PM2·5 (nine studies), NO2 (nine studies), and O3 (four studies). Pooled random effects RRs for incident adult asthma per 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2·5 were 1·07 (95% CI 1·01 to 1·13) and per 10 μg/m3 in NO2 were 1·11 (1·03 to 1·20). We found no significant association between increasing O3 concentration and incident adult asthma (per 60-μg/m3 increase in O3, pooled RR 1·04 [0·79 to 1·36]). We found substantial heterogeneity across studies (I2=88% for all analyses). In exploratory meta-regression, average exposure level was a significant source of heterogeneity for the pooled NO2 estimate (95% CI -0·0077 to -0·0025 per μg/m3).

Interpretation: Exposure to increased ambient PM2·5 or NO2 might present an additional risk factor for incident adult asthma, although high heterogeneity among included studies warrants caution in interpretation. Evidence was inconsistent for O3 and insufficient for SO2. To increase confidence and population representation in pooled estimates, further primary investigations are necessary, ideally with aligned methodology and reporting.

Funding: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境空气污染暴露与成人哮喘发病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:环境(室外)空气污染物暴露已成为儿童哮喘发生的一个可信的危险因素。然而,环境空气污染物暴露对成人哮喘发病风险的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是调查特定环境空气污染物与成人哮喘发病风险之间的关系。方法:在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和Web of Science,检索时间从成立到2023年11月27日。我们纳入了以成年期新发哮喘(发病≥18岁)为结局的观察性研究,以及暴露于环境空气污染物(颗粒物[PM] 2.5、二氧化氮[NO2]、臭氧[O3]和二氧化硫[SO2])的指标。研究数据由两位评论者独立提取,研究质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。当有四项或更多符合条件的研究可用于给定污染物时,我们在随机效应模型中使用逆方差加权进行meta分析,以估计综合相对风险(RR),并使用meta回归来探索异质性的来源。协议注册号为PROSPERO, CRD42023420139。结果:我们的搜索确定了1891个参考文献。在排除651项(34%)重复和不合格研究后,我们在系统评价中纳入了25项研究。在排除了重叠人群的研究或无法汇总的报告效应估计后,我们对PM2·5(9项研究)、NO2(9项研究)和O3(4项研究)进行了荟萃分析。PM2·5浓度每增加5 μg/m3导致成人哮喘的合并随机效应比为1.07 (95% CI为1.01 ~ 1.13),NO2浓度每增加10 μg/m3导致成人哮喘的合并随机效应比为1.11 (95% CI为1.03 ~ 1.20)。我们发现臭氧浓度升高与成人哮喘发病率之间无显著关联(臭氧浓度每增加60-μg/m3,合并RR为1.04[0.79 ~ 1.36])。我们发现研究之间存在很大的异质性(所有分析的I2=88%)。在探索性元回归中,平均暴露水平是综合NO2估计的重要异质性来源(95% CI为- 0.0077至- 0.0025 / μg/m3)。解释:暴露于增加的环境PM2·5或NO2可能是成人哮喘事件的额外危险因素,尽管纳入研究的高度异质性值得谨慎解释。O3的证据不一致,SO2的证据不足。为了提高综合估计的可信度和人口代表性,有必要进行进一步的初步调查,最好采用一致的方法和报告。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
28.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Planetary Health is a gold Open Access journal dedicated to investigating and addressing the multifaceted determinants of healthy human civilizations and their impact on natural systems. Positioned as a key player in sustainable development, the journal covers a broad, interdisciplinary scope, encompassing areas such as poverty, nutrition, gender equity, water and sanitation, energy, economic growth, industrialization, inequality, urbanization, human consumption and production, climate change, ocean health, land use, peace, and justice. With a commitment to publishing high-quality research, comment, and correspondence, it aims to be the leading journal for sustainable development in the face of unprecedented dangers and threats.
期刊最新文献
A framework for ecologically and socially informed risk reduction before and after outbreaks of wildlife-borne zoonoses. Associations between weather extremes and faecal contamination along pathogen transmission pathways in rural Bangladeshi households: a prospective observational study. Communicating with policy makers about climate change, health, and their intersection: a scoping review. Mapping hotspots of zoonotic pathogen emergence: an integrated model-based and participatory-based approach. New national climate plans offer the best opportunity yet to secure a healthy and stable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1