Does short-selling threat potentially influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from equity lending supply

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103859
Ge Lan , Xin Gao , Xiaolan Zheng , Hang Zhou , Donghui Li
{"title":"Does short-selling threat potentially influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from equity lending supply","authors":"Ge Lan ,&nbsp;Xin Gao ,&nbsp;Xiaolan Zheng ,&nbsp;Hang Zhou ,&nbsp;Donghui Li","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines whether the equity lending supply strengthens or weakens corporate risk-taking behaviors. The evidence shows that ex-ante short selling can unintentionally function as an external governance mechanism to discipline self-interested, risk-averse managers. This showed an increase in long-term risk-taking among U.S. firms from 2006 to 2017. The robustness of our findings is confirmed by the consistent results obtained using alternative dependent variables and varying data sampling frequencies, which was further reinforced by causality checks through external shocks and instrumental variables. Cross-sectional tests indicate that the disciplinary role played by short sellers is stronger in firms with weaker corporate governance, greater financial constraints, and less incentivized managers. After excluding alternative explanations, we find that the positive impact of short selling on corporate risk-taking is determined by investor attention drawn by short sellers, confirming the disciplinary role of the market's invisible hand. More tests confirm the positive effects of our primary findings. This study provides robust empirical evidence that short sellers have an impact on favorable long-term corporate risk-taking and offers valuable insights for fiscal policy and academic discussion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 103859"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924007919","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines whether the equity lending supply strengthens or weakens corporate risk-taking behaviors. The evidence shows that ex-ante short selling can unintentionally function as an external governance mechanism to discipline self-interested, risk-averse managers. This showed an increase in long-term risk-taking among U.S. firms from 2006 to 2017. The robustness of our findings is confirmed by the consistent results obtained using alternative dependent variables and varying data sampling frequencies, which was further reinforced by causality checks through external shocks and instrumental variables. Cross-sectional tests indicate that the disciplinary role played by short sellers is stronger in firms with weaker corporate governance, greater financial constraints, and less incentivized managers. After excluding alternative explanations, we find that the positive impact of short selling on corporate risk-taking is determined by investor attention drawn by short sellers, confirming the disciplinary role of the market's invisible hand. More tests confirm the positive effects of our primary findings. This study provides robust empirical evidence that short sellers have an impact on favorable long-term corporate risk-taking and offers valuable insights for fiscal policy and academic discussion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卖空威胁是否可能影响企业的风险承担?股票借贷供给的证据
本研究考察股权贷款供给是否会增强或削弱企业的风险承担行为。有证据表明,事前卖空可以无意间成为一种外部治理机制,约束自私自利、厌恶风险的管理者。这表明,从2006年到2017年,美国公司的长期冒险行为有所增加。使用替代因变量和不同数据采样频率获得的一致结果证实了我们研究结果的稳健性,并通过外部冲击和工具变量进一步加强了因果关系检查。横断面检验表明,在公司治理较弱、财务约束较大、经理人激励较弱的公司中,卖空者的惩戒作用更强。排除其他解释后,我们发现卖空对企业风险承担的正向影响是由卖空者吸引投资者注意力决定的,证实了市场看不见的手的惩戒作用。更多的试验证实了我们初步发现的积极影响。本研究提供了强有力的实证证据,证明卖空者对有利的长期企业风险承担有影响,并为财政政策和学术讨论提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Judicial transparency and trade credit financing: Evidence from mass court judgment disclosure Market sentiment, risk spillover, and the heterogeneous performance of stablecoins: Evidence from cross-quantile analysis and network connectedness Small hands, big losses: Stock market reactions to child labor abuse news The effects of multiple disaster forecasters on the willingness-to-pay for the insurance in the gain and loss domains: Theory and a laboratory experiment Social media emotions and market behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1