Hubert Hörterer, Sonia Oppelt, Kathrin Pfahl, Norbert Harrasser, Wolfgang Böcker, Hans Polzer, Markus Walther, Sebastian Felix Baumbach
{"title":"Outcomes of Revision surgery for surgically treated insertional Achilles tendinopathy","authors":"Hubert Hörterer, Sonia Oppelt, Kathrin Pfahl, Norbert Harrasser, Wolfgang Böcker, Hans Polzer, Markus Walther, Sebastian Felix Baumbach","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is a clear roadmap for the treatment of primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT), but data on the outcome of revision surgery is missing. The current study aimed to analyze the outcome following revision surgery for surgically failed IAT.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Included were patients with IAT revision surgery at a single reference center (01/2010–10/2016) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. Revision surgery was performed, whenever possible, through a midline incision transachillary approach (MITA) with debridement of all pathologies present. The patient-rated outcome was assessed per the FFI (preoperative, final follow-up) and VISA-A-G (final follow-up). The aim was to evaluate the patient rated outcome following revision surgery for recurrent IAT.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 24 eligible patients, 19 (79%) were included in the final follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 ± 2.2 years. The FFI Overall improved from preoperatively 68 ± 19 to 14 ± 17 points (< 0.001) at the final follow-up. The final VISA-A-G was 71 ± 28 points. 39%/36% (FFI/VISA-A-G) of patients reached patient-rated outcome scores comparable to a healthy reference population. No factors could be identified to influence the outcome significantly.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IAT revision surgery results in an improvement of the patients’ symptoms, but only one-third of the patients recover fully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
There is a clear roadmap for the treatment of primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT), but data on the outcome of revision surgery is missing. The current study aimed to analyze the outcome following revision surgery for surgically failed IAT.
Material and methods
Included were patients with IAT revision surgery at a single reference center (01/2010–10/2016) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. Revision surgery was performed, whenever possible, through a midline incision transachillary approach (MITA) with debridement of all pathologies present. The patient-rated outcome was assessed per the FFI (preoperative, final follow-up) and VISA-A-G (final follow-up). The aim was to evaluate the patient rated outcome following revision surgery for recurrent IAT.
Results
Out of 24 eligible patients, 19 (79%) were included in the final follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 ± 2.2 years. The FFI Overall improved from preoperatively 68 ± 19 to 14 ± 17 points (< 0.001) at the final follow-up. The final VISA-A-G was 71 ± 28 points. 39%/36% (FFI/VISA-A-G) of patients reached patient-rated outcome scores comparable to a healthy reference population. No factors could be identified to influence the outcome significantly.
Conclusion
IAT revision surgery results in an improvement of the patients’ symptoms, but only one-third of the patients recover fully.
期刊介绍:
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance.
"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).