Outcomes of Revision surgery for surgically treated insertional Achilles tendinopathy

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9
Hubert Hörterer, Sonia Oppelt, Kathrin Pfahl, Norbert Harrasser, Wolfgang Böcker, Hans Polzer, Markus Walther, Sebastian Felix Baumbach
{"title":"Outcomes of Revision surgery for surgically treated insertional Achilles tendinopathy","authors":"Hubert Hörterer,&nbsp;Sonia Oppelt,&nbsp;Kathrin Pfahl,&nbsp;Norbert Harrasser,&nbsp;Wolfgang Böcker,&nbsp;Hans Polzer,&nbsp;Markus Walther,&nbsp;Sebastian Felix Baumbach","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is a clear roadmap for the treatment of primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT), but data on the outcome of revision surgery is missing. The current study aimed to analyze the outcome following revision surgery for surgically failed IAT.</p><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Included were patients with IAT revision surgery at a single reference center (01/2010–10/2016) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. Revision surgery was performed, whenever possible, through a midline incision transachillary approach (MITA) with debridement of all pathologies present. The patient-rated outcome was assessed per the FFI (preoperative, final follow-up) and VISA-A-G (final follow-up). The aim was to evaluate the patient rated outcome following revision surgery for recurrent IAT.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Out of 24 eligible patients, 19 (79%) were included in the final follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 ± 2.2 years. The FFI Overall improved from preoperatively 68 ± 19 to 14 ± 17 points (&lt; 0.001) at the final follow-up. The final VISA-A-G was 71 ± 28 points. 39%/36% (FFI/VISA-A-G) of patients reached patient-rated outcome scores comparable to a healthy reference population. No factors could be identified to influence the outcome significantly.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>IAT revision surgery results in an improvement of the patients’ symptoms, but only one-third of the patients recover fully.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05693-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There is a clear roadmap for the treatment of primary insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT), but data on the outcome of revision surgery is missing. The current study aimed to analyze the outcome following revision surgery for surgically failed IAT.

Material and methods

Included were patients with IAT revision surgery at a single reference center (01/2010–10/2016) and a follow-up of at least 12 months. Revision surgery was performed, whenever possible, through a midline incision transachillary approach (MITA) with debridement of all pathologies present. The patient-rated outcome was assessed per the FFI (preoperative, final follow-up) and VISA-A-G (final follow-up). The aim was to evaluate the patient rated outcome following revision surgery for recurrent IAT.

Results

Out of 24 eligible patients, 19 (79%) were included in the final follow-up. The mean follow-up duration was 4.6 ± 2.2 years. The FFI Overall improved from preoperatively 68 ± 19 to 14 ± 17 points (< 0.001) at the final follow-up. The final VISA-A-G was 71 ± 28 points. 39%/36% (FFI/VISA-A-G) of patients reached patient-rated outcome scores comparable to a healthy reference population. No factors could be identified to influence the outcome significantly.

Conclusion

IAT revision surgery results in an improvement of the patients’ symptoms, but only one-third of the patients recover fully.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术治疗插入性跟腱病的翻修手术疗效
引言对于原发性插入性跟腱病(IAT)的治疗已有明确的路线图,但缺乏有关翻修手术疗效的数据。本研究旨在分析手术失败的IAT翻修手术后的疗效。材料与方法包括在一家参考中心接受IAT翻修手术的患者(01/2010-10/2016),随访至少12个月。翻修手术尽可能通过中线切口经腋窝入路(MITA)进行,并对存在的所有病变进行清创。患者评分结果根据 FFI(术前、最终随访)和 VISA-A-G (最终随访)进行评估。结果 在24名符合条件的患者中,19人(79%)接受了最终随访。平均随访时间为 4.6 ± 2.2 年。最终随访时,FFI 总分从术前的 68 ± 19 分降至 14 ± 17 分 (< 0.001)。最终的 VISA-A-G 为 71 ± 28 分。39%/36%(FFI/VISA-A-G)的患者达到了与健康参照人群相当的患者评分结果。结论IAT翻修手术能改善患者的症状,但只有三分之一的患者能完全康复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up. Scapho-metacarpal dual mobility prosthesis for TMC-1 joint salvage: technical insights. The single antegrade sling graft: a novel hamstring autograft technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1