Management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the elbow including return to sport remains variable among orthopaedic surgeons

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05635-5
Eric N. Bowman, Gabriel Lane, Charles F. Goldfarb, Matthew V. Smith
{"title":"Management of osteochondritis dissecans lesions of the elbow including return to sport remains variable among orthopaedic surgeons","authors":"Eric N. Bowman,&nbsp;Gabriel Lane,&nbsp;Charles F. Goldfarb,&nbsp;Matthew V. Smith","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05635-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum is challenging. Historically, variability exists between surgeons in the evaluation, treatment, and return to sport criteria. The purpose of this study was to define the current trends regarding evaluation, nonoperative and surgical management, and return to sport criteria for capitellar OCD lesions among surgeons.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 21-question cross-sectional survey was administered to 24 Orthopaedic surgeons specializing in elbow OCDs. The survey included questions concerning imaging, specific non-operative treatments trialed, indications for surgery for stable and unstable lesions, preferred surgical techniques, osteochondral autograft utilization, and factors determining return to sport.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one surgeons responded (88%). The most common surgical indications for stable lesions were time (≥ 6 months, 68%) and mechanical symptoms (52%). Drilling (45%) and fragment fixation (35%) were most preferred. For unstable lesions, factors in order of importance for determining surgical procedure were lesion size, lateral wall integrity, location on capitellum, skeletal maturity, and sport. For small (&lt; 1 cm<sup>2</sup>), centralized lesions, 81% preferred debridement with microfracture. For large (&gt; 1 cm<sup>2</sup>), lateralized lesions, 52% preferred debridement and microfracture and 48% preferred osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT). OAT was considered for 80% of failed procedures, 47% with lateral wall involvement, and 27% &gt; 1 cm<sup>2</sup>. Return to sport after debridement was typically 2–3 months (52%), fragment fixation was 4 months (52%), and OAT was 4–6 months, while microfracture had wide variability (3–6 months). The factors in order of importance were lack of pain, time, then imaging. Two-thirds of surgeons wait longer to release overhead athletes or gymnasts.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>There is significant variability in the management of capitellar OCD in athletes. Small, centralized lesions are likely to be treated with debridement and microfracture with faster return to sport. Treatment of large, lateral lesions remains variable. Regarding OAT procedures, perceived morbidity, reimbursement, and limited evidence dissuade use. There is no consensus on return to sport, though lack of pain and time were most important; overhead athletes and gymnasts are restricted longer from returning to sport.</p><p><b>Level of Evidence</b></p><p>Level 5, diagnostic, cross-sectional survey.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05635-5.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05635-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesions of the capitellum is challenging. Historically, variability exists between surgeons in the evaluation, treatment, and return to sport criteria. The purpose of this study was to define the current trends regarding evaluation, nonoperative and surgical management, and return to sport criteria for capitellar OCD lesions among surgeons.

Methods

A 21-question cross-sectional survey was administered to 24 Orthopaedic surgeons specializing in elbow OCDs. The survey included questions concerning imaging, specific non-operative treatments trialed, indications for surgery for stable and unstable lesions, preferred surgical techniques, osteochondral autograft utilization, and factors determining return to sport.

Results

Twenty-one surgeons responded (88%). The most common surgical indications for stable lesions were time (≥ 6 months, 68%) and mechanical symptoms (52%). Drilling (45%) and fragment fixation (35%) were most preferred. For unstable lesions, factors in order of importance for determining surgical procedure were lesion size, lateral wall integrity, location on capitellum, skeletal maturity, and sport. For small (< 1 cm2), centralized lesions, 81% preferred debridement with microfracture. For large (> 1 cm2), lateralized lesions, 52% preferred debridement and microfracture and 48% preferred osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT). OAT was considered for 80% of failed procedures, 47% with lateral wall involvement, and 27% > 1 cm2. Return to sport after debridement was typically 2–3 months (52%), fragment fixation was 4 months (52%), and OAT was 4–6 months, while microfracture had wide variability (3–6 months). The factors in order of importance were lack of pain, time, then imaging. Two-thirds of surgeons wait longer to release overhead athletes or gymnasts.

Conclusions

There is significant variability in the management of capitellar OCD in athletes. Small, centralized lesions are likely to be treated with debridement and microfracture with faster return to sport. Treatment of large, lateral lesions remains variable. Regarding OAT procedures, perceived morbidity, reimbursement, and limited evidence dissuade use. There is no consensus on return to sport, though lack of pain and time were most important; overhead athletes and gymnasts are restricted longer from returning to sport.

Level of Evidence

Level 5, diagnostic, cross-sectional survey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矫形外科医生对肘关节骨软骨炎(包括恢复运动)病变的处理仍存在差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Bipolar vs. monopolar sealer in decreasing blood loss and transfusion rate in patients undergoing two-stage exchange in infected total knee arthroplasty: propensity score-matched study. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after proximal hamstring tendon repair at mean 3 years follow-up. Scapho-metacarpal dual mobility prosthesis for TMC-1 joint salvage: technical insights. The single antegrade sling graft: a novel hamstring autograft technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. Total joint arthroplasty of the thumb CMC joint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1