Content Validation of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a to Measure Respiratory and Fatigue Symptoms of MAC Lung Disease.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03064-9
Kelly P McCarrier, Mariam Hassan, Dayton W Yuen, Jui-Hua Tsai, Nancy Touba, Kevin C Mange
{"title":"Content Validation of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a to Measure Respiratory and Fatigue Symptoms of MAC Lung Disease.","authors":"Kelly P McCarrier, Mariam Hassan, Dayton W Yuen, Jui-Hua Tsai, Nancy Touba, Kevin C Mange","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03064-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) questionnaire and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a (PROMIS-F SF-7a) have the potential to measure respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease but have not yet been evaluated for content validity in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in United States patients with a current MAC lung disease diagnosis. Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted (n = 25 participants) to identify key respiratory and fatigue symptoms expressed as important and relevant to patients with MAC lung disease and to evaluate the appropriateness of the QOL-B and PROMIS-F SF-7a to measure these symptoms. Cognitive interviews (CIs) were subsequently conducted (n = 20 participants) to evaluate the relevance, comprehensibility, and appropriateness of the QOL-B respiratory domain (QOL-B-RD) and PROMIS-F SF-7a. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most important or relevant respiratory symptom concepts to CE interview participants were \"cough,\" \"shortness of breath during activity,\" and \"mucus/phlegm.\" The most important or relevant fatigue symptom concepts were \"tiredness,\" \"lack of energy,\" and \"tire easily/low stamina.\" These symptoms are covered by existing items in the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a. Cognitive interview participants' feedback confirmed the item content, response options, concept attributes, and recall period for each instrument were effective, relevant, and meaningful to most patients with MAC lung disease. Based on Wave 1 findings, the QOL-B instructions were revised for the Wave 2 interviews, where the text referencing \"bronchiectasis\" was replaced with \"your lung condition.\" Participant feedback in Wave 2 confirmed the revised instruction wording was easily understood and appropriate.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results support the content validity of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a, which were shown to be relevant and appropriate to evaluate respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with MAC lung disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03064-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Quality of Life-Bronchiectasis (QOL-B) questionnaire and Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 7a (PROMIS-F SF-7a) have the potential to measure respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) lung disease but have not yet been evaluated for content validity in this population.

Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in United States patients with a current MAC lung disease diagnosis. Concept elicitation (CE) interviews were conducted (n = 25 participants) to identify key respiratory and fatigue symptoms expressed as important and relevant to patients with MAC lung disease and to evaluate the appropriateness of the QOL-B and PROMIS-F SF-7a to measure these symptoms. Cognitive interviews (CIs) were subsequently conducted (n = 20 participants) to evaluate the relevance, comprehensibility, and appropriateness of the QOL-B respiratory domain (QOL-B-RD) and PROMIS-F SF-7a. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded for qualitative content analysis.

Results: The most important or relevant respiratory symptom concepts to CE interview participants were "cough," "shortness of breath during activity," and "mucus/phlegm." The most important or relevant fatigue symptom concepts were "tiredness," "lack of energy," and "tire easily/low stamina." These symptoms are covered by existing items in the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a. Cognitive interview participants' feedback confirmed the item content, response options, concept attributes, and recall period for each instrument were effective, relevant, and meaningful to most patients with MAC lung disease. Based on Wave 1 findings, the QOL-B instructions were revised for the Wave 2 interviews, where the text referencing "bronchiectasis" was replaced with "your lung condition." Participant feedback in Wave 2 confirmed the revised instruction wording was easily understood and appropriate.

Conclusions: The study results support the content validity of the QOL-B-RD and PROMIS-F SF-7a, which were shown to be relevant and appropriate to evaluate respiratory and fatigue symptoms, respectively, in patients with MAC lung disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
QOL-B-RD和PROMIS-F SF-7a的内容验证,用于测量澳门巴黎人娱乐官网肺病的呼吸道症状和疲劳症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Medicare Advantage Population in the United States: Outcomes of Patients with Asthma Treated with ICS/LABA Before and After Initiation with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI). Real-World Safety, Tolerability and Effectiveness of Nintedanib in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Final Report of Post-marketing Surveillance in Japan. An Access-Focused Patient-Centric Value Assessment Framework for Medication Formulary Decision-Making in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Support Trofinetide Dosing for the Treatment of Rett Syndrome. Population Pharmacokinetics of Trofinetide in a Pediatric Population Aged 2-4 Years with Rett Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1