Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Cryoballoon in AF Ablation: Randomized CAVAC AF Trial.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012917
Víctor Castro-Urda, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Diego Jiménez-Sánchez, Cristina Aguilera-Agudo, Paula Vela-Martín, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Daniel García-Rodriguez, David Sánchez-Ortiz, Chinh Pham-Trung, Eusebio García-Izquierdo, Susana Mingo-Santos, Jorge Toquero-Ramos, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano
{"title":"Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Cryoballoon in AF Ablation: Randomized CAVAC AF Trial.","authors":"Víctor Castro-Urda, Melodie Segura-Dominguez, Diego Jiménez-Sánchez, Cristina Aguilera-Agudo, Paula Vela-Martín, Alvaro Lorente-Ros, Daniel García-Rodriguez, David Sánchez-Ortiz, Chinh Pham-Trung, Eusebio García-Izquierdo, Susana Mingo-Santos, Jorge Toquero-Ramos, Ignacio Fernández-Lozano","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Superior vena cava (SVC) has been considered a specific trigger in atrial fibrillation development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated the efficacy and safety of combining cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with SVC ablation compared with PVI alone in 100 patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were randomly assigned to either the PVI+SVC ablation group or the PVI-only group. Each patient was given a mobile device to record a daily ECG and detect atrial tachyarrhythmias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary end point, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence between 91 and 365 days post-catheter ablation, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (62.9% versus 72%; <i>P</i>=0.41). However, the PVI+SVC group exhibited higher rates of phrenic nerve paralysis (20.8% versus 6%; <i>P</i>=0.003) and transient sinus node injury (18.8% versus 0%; <i>P</i>=0.001) compared with the PVI-only group. The median burden of atrial tachyarrhythmia showed no significant difference (<i>P</i>=0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of SVC ablation to PVI did not enhance freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 12 months, and it led to increased complications. These findings do not support the routine inclusion of SVC ablation in cryoballoon procedures for first-time catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e012917"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012917","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Superior vena cava (SVC) has been considered a specific trigger in atrial fibrillation development.

Methods: We investigated the efficacy and safety of combining cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with SVC ablation compared with PVI alone in 100 patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation. Patients were randomly assigned to either the PVI+SVC ablation group or the PVI-only group. Each patient was given a mobile device to record a daily ECG and detect atrial tachyarrhythmias.

Results: The primary end point, freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence between 91 and 365 days post-catheter ablation, did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (62.9% versus 72%; P=0.41). However, the PVI+SVC group exhibited higher rates of phrenic nerve paralysis (20.8% versus 6%; P=0.003) and transient sinus node injury (18.8% versus 0%; P=0.001) compared with the PVI-only group. The median burden of atrial tachyarrhythmia showed no significant difference (P=0.91).

Conclusions: The addition of SVC ablation to PVI did not enhance freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 12 months, and it led to increased complications. These findings do not support the routine inclusion of SVC ablation in cryoballoon procedures for first-time catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal or non-long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
期刊最新文献
Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation With Versus Without Additional Right Atrial Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CRALAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Nurse-Led Multicomponent Behavioral Activation Intervention for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pulsed Field Ablation Using Focal Contact Force-Sensing Catheters for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: 1-Year Outcomes of the ECLIPSE AF Study. Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Complex Fascicular Ventricular Tachycardias. Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Cryoballoon in AF Ablation: Randomized CAVAC AF Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1