Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Dual Wavelength Low-Level Light Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004509
Meryl Thomas, Max Stockslager, John Oakley, Thomas Matthew Womble, Rodney Sinclair
{"title":"Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Dual Wavelength Low-Level Light Therapy in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Meryl Thomas, Max Stockslager, John Oakley, Thomas Matthew Womble, Rodney Sinclair","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The light-emitting diode cap being investigated is FDA cleared for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluating 3 versions of a red and blue light LED cap: (1) 625- and 660-nm red light, (2) 425-nm blue light, and (3) both 425-nm blue light and 625- and 660-nm red light against sham.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty-six-week, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Adults aged 18 to 65 years with AGA were randomized to an active device or sham and underwent 10-minute treatments daily.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixty subjects were randomized. Ninety-one subjects were excluded for the per-protocol analysis. The per-protocol population included participants who completed 16 weeks of treatment, had no major protocol violations, and were at least 80% treatment compliant. Although the primary endpoint (mean change in non-vellus hair count from baseline to week 16) did not reach statistical significance in the individual study arms, in the pooled analysis (combining the 3 active study arms), there was a statistically significant (p = .033) difference versus sham. The pooled study cap group achieved 28.5 more hairs per cm2 when compared with sham.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LED caps were well tolerated and increased hair density in patients with AGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004509","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The light-emitting diode cap being investigated is FDA cleared for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA).

Objective: Evaluating 3 versions of a red and blue light LED cap: (1) 625- and 660-nm red light, (2) 425-nm blue light, and (3) both 425-nm blue light and 625- and 660-nm red light against sham.

Patients and methods: Twenty-six-week, multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. Adults aged 18 to 65 years with AGA were randomized to an active device or sham and underwent 10-minute treatments daily.

Results: One hundred sixty subjects were randomized. Ninety-one subjects were excluded for the per-protocol analysis. The per-protocol population included participants who completed 16 weeks of treatment, had no major protocol violations, and were at least 80% treatment compliant. Although the primary endpoint (mean change in non-vellus hair count from baseline to week 16) did not reach statistical significance in the individual study arms, in the pooled analysis (combining the 3 active study arms), there was a statistically significant (p = .033) difference versus sham. The pooled study cap group achieved 28.5 more hairs per cm2 when compared with sham.

Conclusion: The LED caps were well tolerated and increased hair density in patients with AGA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双波长低强度光疗法对雄激素性脱发的临床安全性和有效性:双盲随机对照研究》。
背景:正在研究的发光二极管帽已获得美国食品及药物管理局批准,用于治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA):正在研究的发光二极管帽已获得美国食品及药物管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA):评估3种版本的红蓝光LED帽:(1) 625-和660-纳米红光,(2) 425-纳米蓝光,(3) 425-纳米蓝光和625-和660-纳米红光与假光:为期 26 周的多中心随机对照双盲研究。年龄在 18 至 65 岁之间的成人 AGA 患者被随机分配到有源设备或假光中,每天接受 10 分钟的治疗:结果:160 名受试者被随机选中。按协议分析排除了 91 名受试者。按协议人群包括完成 16 周治疗、无重大违反协议行为、治疗依从性至少达到 80% 的受试者。虽然主要终点(从基线到第 16 周非倒竖毛发数量的平均变化)在单个研究臂中未达到统计学意义,但在汇总分析中(结合 3 个积极研究臂),与假毛发相比,差异具有统计学意义(p = .033)。综合研究帽组每平方厘米的毛发数量比假帽组多出 28.5 根:结论:LED帽的耐受性良好,可增加AGA患者的毛发密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
期刊最新文献
Preventative Botulinum Toxin: Promotion and Sentiment on Instagram in the Context of Limited Evidence. Deoxycholate for Subcutaneous Fat Reduction: A Review of Current Literature and Potential New Delivery Systems. Topical Tranexamic Acid Application for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Procedures. Updated Review of Cellular Dermatofibroma: Benign or Not? Repair of a Nasal Alar Defect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1