Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08614-3
Roberta Zupo, Beatrice Poggi, Nicole Caggiano, Giulio Varrone, Fabio Castellana, Silvia Natoli, Rodolfo Sardone, Antonio Nardone, Chiara Pavese
{"title":"Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.","authors":"Roberta Zupo, Beatrice Poggi, Nicole Caggiano, Giulio Varrone, Fabio Castellana, Silvia Natoli, Rodolfo Sardone, Antonio Nardone, Chiara Pavese","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08614-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Latest epidemiological metrics put a global prevalence of 20.6 million people suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a burden of functional disability, deterioration in quality of life and reduced life expectancy. A thorough statement of diagnostic methods and treatment protocols for swallowing disorders after SCI stands as a major priority to streamline patient care and cost-sharing. Here we have provided a systematic overview of the evidence on diagnostic and rehabilitation protocols of dysphagia in the SCI population.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>The literature was searched in six electronic databases up to April 30<sup>th</sup>, 2024. Screening the 521 retrieved articles for inclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 43 studies that reported assessment tools and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in patients with SCI. Two researchers extracted the data in parallel, and inter-rater reliability (IRR) was used to estimate inter-coder agreement and then κ statistic to measure accuracy and precision. Based on PRISMA concepts and quality assessment steps, a k coefficient of at least 0.9 was obtained in all data extraction steps. All reports were assessed for risk of bias using the NIH Quality Assessment Toolkit. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023449137).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Dysphagia assessment methods were collected and grouped into four different macro categories (clinical assessment, rating scale, self-reported questionnaire, and instrumental assessment). It was found that the Bedside Swallow Evaluation (BSE) for the clinical assessment category (50%), the Bazaz score (32.5%) for the rating scale category, the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) (44.4%) for the self-reported questionnaire category, and the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing (VFSS) (48.9%) for the instrumental assessment category were the most representative tools. The rehabilitation protocols described included either an early oral feeding exclusion or a consistency-modified oral intake, postural adaptations, oxygen therapy with a high-flow nasal cannula combined with indirect/direct therapy, specific exercises, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in SCI patients appear inconsistent. Further rigorous studies are needed to achieve better clinical handling in SCI settings while lowering the load of patient morbidity and related healthcare costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08614-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Latest epidemiological metrics put a global prevalence of 20.6 million people suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a burden of functional disability, deterioration in quality of life and reduced life expectancy. A thorough statement of diagnostic methods and treatment protocols for swallowing disorders after SCI stands as a major priority to streamline patient care and cost-sharing. Here we have provided a systematic overview of the evidence on diagnostic and rehabilitation protocols of dysphagia in the SCI population.

Evidence acquisition: The literature was searched in six electronic databases up to April 30th, 2024. Screening the 521 retrieved articles for inclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 43 studies that reported assessment tools and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in patients with SCI. Two researchers extracted the data in parallel, and inter-rater reliability (IRR) was used to estimate inter-coder agreement and then κ statistic to measure accuracy and precision. Based on PRISMA concepts and quality assessment steps, a k coefficient of at least 0.9 was obtained in all data extraction steps. All reports were assessed for risk of bias using the NIH Quality Assessment Toolkit. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023449137).

Evidence synthesis: Dysphagia assessment methods were collected and grouped into four different macro categories (clinical assessment, rating scale, self-reported questionnaire, and instrumental assessment). It was found that the Bedside Swallow Evaluation (BSE) for the clinical assessment category (50%), the Bazaz score (32.5%) for the rating scale category, the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) (44.4%) for the self-reported questionnaire category, and the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing (VFSS) (48.9%) for the instrumental assessment category were the most representative tools. The rehabilitation protocols described included either an early oral feeding exclusion or a consistency-modified oral intake, postural adaptations, oxygen therapy with a high-flow nasal cannula combined with indirect/direct therapy, specific exercises, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Conclusions: Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in SCI patients appear inconsistent. Further rigorous studies are needed to achieve better clinical handling in SCI settings while lowering the load of patient morbidity and related healthcare costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:最新的流行病学指标显示,全球脊髓损伤(SCI)患者达 2060 万,导致功能障碍、生活质量下降和预期寿命缩短。全面阐述 SCI 后吞咽障碍的诊断方法和治疗方案是简化患者护理和费用分担的当务之急。在此,我们对有关 SCI 患者吞咽困难的诊断和康复方案的证据进行了系统性概述:我们在六个电子数据库中检索了截至 2024 年 4 月 30 日的文献。根据纳入标准对检索到的 521 篇文章进行筛选,最终选出 43 项研究,这些研究报告了 SCI 患者吞咽困难的评估工具和康复方案。两名研究人员同时提取数据,并使用评分者间可靠性(IRR)来估算编码者间的一致性,然后使用κ统计量来衡量准确性和精确性。根据 PRISMA 概念和质量评估步骤,所有数据提取步骤的 k 系数至少为 0.9。使用美国国立卫生研究院质量评估工具包对所有报告进行了偏倚风险评估。研究方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42023449137)上注册:收集吞咽困难评估方法,并将其分为四个不同的宏观类别(临床评估、评分量表、自我报告问卷和工具评估)。结果发现,临床评估类别中的床旁吞咽评估(BSE)(50%)、评级量表类别中的巴扎兹评分(32.5%)、自我报告问卷类别中的进食评估工具-10(EAT-10)(44.4%)以及工具评估类别中的视频荧光屏吞咽研究(VFSS)(48.9%)是最具代表性的工具。所描述的康复方案包括早期口腔喂养排除或一致性修正口腔摄入、体位调整、高流量鼻插管氧疗结合间接/直接疗法、特定运动和神经肌肉电刺激:针对 SCI 患者吞咽困难的诊断方法和康复方案似乎并不一致。需要进一步开展严格的研究,以便在 SCI 环境中更好地进行临床治疗,同时降低患者的发病率和相关医疗费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Fully remote versus hybrid supervision of pulmonary telerehabilitation in COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. Rehabilitation of post-stroke aphasia by a single protocol targeting phonological, lexical, and semantic deficits with speech output tasks: a randomized controlled trial. Association between muscle strength and echogenicity using greyscale ultrasound software: a diagnostic accuracy study in kidney transplant candidates. Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Motivation in veterans with an acute/subacute ischemic stroke did not improve cognition and functional motor recovery but reduced deaths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1