Effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method to ABR results on newborn hearing screening.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185
Semih Guler, Ayse Sanem Sahli, Murat Dogan
{"title":"Effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method to ABR results on newborn hearing screening.","authors":"Semih Guler, Ayse Sanem Sahli, Murat Dogan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to examine the effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method on the screening ABR test results of newborns within the scope of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHCP) and to investigate the relationship between the test results and the relevant variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>441 newborns were included in the study. Of these newborns, 221 constituted the control group (normal (vaginal) delivery), and 220 constituted the study group (cesarean section, delivery). In the study, all newborns whose hearing was evaluated within the scope of the Newborn Screening Program were screened twice. Screening ABR test results applied were compared considering the type of delivery (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general). The effects of variables such as the duration of the baby's separation (dissection) from the mother's womb, the duration of exposure to the anesthetic agent and the total duration of the surgical procedure were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship was found between delivery type (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general) and first screening ABR test results (p < 0.001). While there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of separation time from the mother's womb (p < 0.001) and exposure to an anesthetic agent among the first test screening ABR results of newborns born under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of total surgical procedure time (p = 0.106) no difference was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between ABR test results and these three variables in newborns born under spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The type of delivery newborns and the anesthesia method used at delivery may affect the results of screening ABR applied within the scope of a newborn hearing screening protocol. For this reason, it is very important to perform screening tests at the most appropriate and correct time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14388,"journal":{"name":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","volume":"188 ","pages":"112185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.112185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of type of delivery and anesthesia method on the screening ABR test results of newborns within the scope of the Newborn Hearing Screening Program (NHCP) and to investigate the relationship between the test results and the relevant variables.

Methods: 441 newborns were included in the study. Of these newborns, 221 constituted the control group (normal (vaginal) delivery), and 220 constituted the study group (cesarean section, delivery). In the study, all newborns whose hearing was evaluated within the scope of the Newborn Screening Program were screened twice. Screening ABR test results applied were compared considering the type of delivery (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general). The effects of variables such as the duration of the baby's separation (dissection) from the mother's womb, the duration of exposure to the anesthetic agent and the total duration of the surgical procedure were examined.

Results: As a result of the study, a statistically significant relationship was found between delivery type (normal (vaginal) or cesarean section) and anesthesia method (spinal or general) and first screening ABR test results (p < 0.001). While there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of separation time from the mother's womb (p < 0.001) and exposure to an anesthetic agent among the first test screening ABR results of newborns born under general anesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) in terms of total surgical procedure time (p = 0.106) no difference was detected. There was no statistically significant difference between ABR test results and these three variables in newborns born under spinal anesthesia (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The type of delivery newborns and the anesthesia method used at delivery may affect the results of screening ABR applied within the scope of a newborn hearing screening protocol. For this reason, it is very important to perform screening tests at the most appropriate and correct time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分娩方式和麻醉方法对新生儿听力筛查 ABR 结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
276
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is to concentrate and disseminate information concerning prevention, cure and care of otorhinolaryngological disorders in infants and children due to developmental, degenerative, infectious, neoplastic, traumatic, social, psychiatric and economic causes. The Journal provides a medium for clinical and basic contributions in all of the areas of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. This includes medical and surgical otology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, diseases of the head and neck, and disorders of communication, including voice, speech and language disorders.
期刊最新文献
Radio-clinical assessment of crista fenestra during pediatric cochlear implantation. Acute mastoiditis: 30 years review in a tertiary hospital. Pediatric cochlear implantation in otitis media with effusion: Are ventilation tubes truly necessary? Improve the behavioral auditory attention training effects on the Speech-In-Noise perception with simultaneous electrical stimulation in children with hearing loss: A randomized clinical trial. Corrigendum to "A review of the importance of top-down processing assessment in auditory processing disorder" [Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 186, (November 2024), 112128].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1