Development and psychometric testing of an instrument for team-based learning assessment.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1064_23
Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Aeen Mohammadi, Sima Kolahdooz, Dean X Parmelee, Gholamreza Hassanzadeh
{"title":"Development and psychometric testing of an instrument for team-based learning assessment.","authors":"Rita Mojtahedzadeh, Aeen Mohammadi, Sima Kolahdooz, Dean X Parmelee, Gholamreza Hassanzadeh","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1064_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In team-based learning (TBL), students actively participate in the learning process and are responsible for their learning through preclass studying and team work with other classmates. Evaluation of the TBL method by students provides information for its better implementation. Due to extensive use of TBL method in medical curriculum at medical universities, we aimed to develop a questionnaire for its evaluation from the viewpoints of students.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This mixed-method cross-sectional study with a Qual-Quan design was conducted on 168 medical students in the basic sciences stage of their studies. We evaluated students' satisfaction with this teaching method and its effectiveness by semistructural in-depth individual interviews until data saturation (12 interviews). We performed content analysis of the interviews and designed the questionnaire. Psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire were assessed in terms of content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity through explanatory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final tool was a 25-item questionnaire (reliability = 0.87 and α = 0.93) with five components of \"learning enhancement,\" \"satisfaction,\" \"technical aspects,\" \"teacher's capabilities,\" and \"appropriate testing.\" Explanatory factor analysis showed that 64.68% of total variances were explained by these five components.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In addition to academic performance outcomes, a successful instructional strategy should generate positive experiences for the learner. This study has created an assessment tool to be part of an evaluation process of the effectiveness of TBL in a given curriculum for medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1064_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In team-based learning (TBL), students actively participate in the learning process and are responsible for their learning through preclass studying and team work with other classmates. Evaluation of the TBL method by students provides information for its better implementation. Due to extensive use of TBL method in medical curriculum at medical universities, we aimed to develop a questionnaire for its evaluation from the viewpoints of students.

Materials and methods: This mixed-method cross-sectional study with a Qual-Quan design was conducted on 168 medical students in the basic sciences stage of their studies. We evaluated students' satisfaction with this teaching method and its effectiveness by semistructural in-depth individual interviews until data saturation (12 interviews). We performed content analysis of the interviews and designed the questionnaire. Psychometric characteristics of the questionnaire were assessed in terms of content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity through explanatory factor analysis.

Results: The final tool was a 25-item questionnaire (reliability = 0.87 and α = 0.93) with five components of "learning enhancement," "satisfaction," "technical aspects," "teacher's capabilities," and "appropriate testing." Explanatory factor analysis showed that 64.68% of total variances were explained by these five components.

Conclusion: In addition to academic performance outcomes, a successful instructional strategy should generate positive experiences for the learner. This study has created an assessment tool to be part of an evaluation process of the effectiveness of TBL in a given curriculum for medical students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团队学习评估工具的开发和心理测试。
背景:在基于团队的学习(TBL)中,学生通过课前学习和与其他同学的团队合作,积极参与学习过程,并对自己的学习负责。学生对 TBL 方法的评价为更好地实施该方法提供了信息。鉴于 TBL 教学法在医科大学医学课程中的广泛应用,我们旨在编制一份问卷,从学生的角度对其进行评价:这项混合方法横断面研究采用Qual-Quan设计,对168名基础科学阶段的医学生进行了调查。我们通过半结构式的深入个别访谈评估了学生对这种教学方法的满意度及其有效性,直至数据饱和(12 次访谈)。我们对访谈内容进行了分析,并设计了调查问卷。通过解释性因子分析,从内容效度、重测信度、内部一致性和建构效度等方面评估了问卷的心理测量特征:最终的工具是一份 25 个项目的问卷(信度 = 0.87,α = 0.93),包含 "学习促进"、"满意度"、"技术方面"、"教师能力 "和 "适当的测试 "五个部分。解释性因素分析表明,这五个组成部分解释了总方差的 64.68%:结论:除了学习成绩之外,成功的教学策略还应为学习者带来积极的体验。本研究创建了一个评估工具,作为医学生特定课程中 TBL 效果评估过程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Protocol of randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of moderate exercise training on the functional capacity of patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in a tertiary care center in South India. Behavioral modification strategies for tobacco cessation: A scoping review. Recent advances in teaching-learning methodologies of the Ayurveda education system. Relationship between organizational commitment, working environment, and burnout in clinical nurses. Design and validation of a self-assessment questionnaire of basic thinking skills.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1