Digital Imaging of Peripheral Blood Smear With MC-80 as a Screening Tool for Thalassemia.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1002/jcla.25135
Peempol Chokchaipermpoonphol, Satana Lamtanthong, Sathaporn Nokkaew
{"title":"Digital Imaging of Peripheral Blood Smear With MC-80 as a Screening Tool for Thalassemia.","authors":"Peempol Chokchaipermpoonphol, Satana Lamtanthong, Sathaporn Nokkaew","doi":"10.1002/jcla.25135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thalassemia, a genetic blood disorder, poses significant global health challenges, emphasizing the importance of accurate screening methods. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as osmotic fragility and dichlorophenolindophenol tests, along with blood indices, such as mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin, have limitations. Digital microscopy of peripheral blood smears is a promising alternative for objective quantification and standardization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples from 81 thalassemia screening-negative and 41 screening-positive individuals were analyzed using Mindray MC-80 Digital Morphology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-classification of red blood cell (RBC) morphology using Mindray MC-80 revealed significant differences between the screening-positive and screening-negative groups. Various RBC morphologies demonstrated statistically significant variance, including hypochromic cells, schistocytes, elliptocytes, target cells, teardrop cells (p < 0.001), and ovalocytes (p = 0.002). However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of these parameters was < 0.8, indicating a limited discriminatory power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RBC morphology showed promise in detecting subtle changes associated with thalassemia. However, it may not be sufficient for accurate screening alone, highlighting the need for complementary diagnostic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e25135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.25135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thalassemia, a genetic blood disorder, poses significant global health challenges, emphasizing the importance of accurate screening methods. Traditional diagnostic tools, such as osmotic fragility and dichlorophenolindophenol tests, along with blood indices, such as mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin, have limitations. Digital microscopy of peripheral blood smears is a promising alternative for objective quantification and standardization.

Methods: Blood samples from 81 thalassemia screening-negative and 41 screening-positive individuals were analyzed using Mindray MC-80 Digital Morphology.

Results: Pre-classification of red blood cell (RBC) morphology using Mindray MC-80 revealed significant differences between the screening-positive and screening-negative groups. Various RBC morphologies demonstrated statistically significant variance, including hypochromic cells, schistocytes, elliptocytes, target cells, teardrop cells (p < 0.001), and ovalocytes (p = 0.002). However, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of these parameters was < 0.8, indicating a limited discriminatory power.

Conclusion: RBC morphology showed promise in detecting subtle changes associated with thalassemia. However, it may not be sufficient for accurate screening alone, highlighting the need for complementary diagnostic approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:地中海贫血症是一种遗传性血液疾病,对全球健康构成重大挑战,因此强调准确筛查方法的重要性。传统的诊断工具,如渗透脆性和二氯苯酚靛酚试验,以及血液指数,如平均血球容积和平均血球血红蛋白,都有其局限性。对外周血涂片进行数码显微镜检查是进行客观量化和标准化的一种有前途的替代方法:方法:使用 Mindray MC-80 Digital Morphology 分析了 81 例地中海贫血筛查阴性和 41 例筛查阳性患者的血样:结果:使用 Mindray MC-80 对红细胞(RBC)形态进行预分类后发现,筛查阳性组和筛查阴性组之间存在显著差异。各种红细胞形态均显示出统计学上的显著差异,包括低色素细胞、裂殖细胞、椭圆形细胞、靶细胞、泪滴细胞(p 结论:红细胞形态学显示出检测筛查阳性和筛查阴性红细胞的前景:红细胞形态学有望检测出与地中海贫血有关的细微变化。然而,仅靠它可能不足以进行准确筛查,因此需要辅助诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
期刊最新文献
Establishing Decisional Cutoff Values of Neurofilament Light Chains in Cerebrospinal Fluid Measured by Fully Automated Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay. Potential Correlation Between Hematological Parameters and Palpitation in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Retrospective Study. The Clinical Value of Novel Inflammatory Biomarkers for Predicting Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infection in Children. Nucleocapsid Antibodies as an Optimal Serological Marker of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Longitudinal Study at the Thomayer University Hospital. Significant Association Between Genetic Polymorphism of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-2 mRNA Binding Protein-2 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1