Detecting fast-ripples on both micro- and macro-electrodes in epilepsy: a wavelet-based CNN detector.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110350
Ludovic Gardy, Jonathan Curot, Luc Valton, Louis Berthier, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Christophe Hurter
{"title":"Detecting fast-ripples on both micro- and macro-electrodes in epilepsy: a wavelet-based CNN detector.","authors":"Ludovic Gardy, Jonathan Curot, Luc Valton, Louis Berthier, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Christophe Hurter","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast-ripples (FR) are short (~10 ms) high-frequency oscillations (HFO) between 200-600Hz that are helpful in epilepsy to identify the epileptogenic zone. Our aim is to propose a new method to detect FR that had to be efficient for intracerebral EEG (iEEG) recorded from both usual clinical macro-contacts (millimeter scale) and microwires (micrometer scale).</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>Step 1 of the detection method is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained using a large database of >11,000 FR recorded from the iEEG of 38 patients with epilepsy from both macro-contacts and microwires. The FR and non-FR events were fed to the CNN as normalized time-frequency maps. Step 2 is based on feature-based control techniques in order to reject false positives. In step 3, the human is reinstated in the decision-making process for final validation using a graphical user interface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WALFRID achieved high performance on the realistically simulated data with sensitivity up to 99.95% and precision up to 96.51%. The detector was able to adapt to both macro and micro-EEG recordings. The real data was used without any pre-processing step such as artefact rejection. The precision of the automatic detection was of 57.5. Step 3 helped eliminating remaining false positives in a few minutes per subject.</p><p><strong>Comparison with existing methods: </strong>WALFRID performed as well or better than 6 other existing methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since WALFRID was created to mimic the work-up of the neurologist, clinicians can easily use, understand, interpret and, if necessary, correct the output.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fast-ripples (FR) are short (~10 ms) high-frequency oscillations (HFO) between 200-600Hz that are helpful in epilepsy to identify the epileptogenic zone. Our aim is to propose a new method to detect FR that had to be efficient for intracerebral EEG (iEEG) recorded from both usual clinical macro-contacts (millimeter scale) and microwires (micrometer scale).

New method: Step 1 of the detection method is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained using a large database of >11,000 FR recorded from the iEEG of 38 patients with epilepsy from both macro-contacts and microwires. The FR and non-FR events were fed to the CNN as normalized time-frequency maps. Step 2 is based on feature-based control techniques in order to reject false positives. In step 3, the human is reinstated in the decision-making process for final validation using a graphical user interface.

Results: WALFRID achieved high performance on the realistically simulated data with sensitivity up to 99.95% and precision up to 96.51%. The detector was able to adapt to both macro and micro-EEG recordings. The real data was used without any pre-processing step such as artefact rejection. The precision of the automatic detection was of 57.5. Step 3 helped eliminating remaining false positives in a few minutes per subject.

Comparison with existing methods: WALFRID performed as well or better than 6 other existing methods.

Conclusion: Since WALFRID was created to mimic the work-up of the neurologist, clinicians can easily use, understand, interpret and, if necessary, correct the output.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
期刊最新文献
Exploring persistence in animal models: the sinking platform test. Detecting fast-ripples on both micro- and macro-electrodes in epilepsy: a wavelet-based CNN detector. Using a mixed-reality headset to elicit and track clinically relevant movement in the clinic. Studying decision making in rats using a contextual visual discrimination task: Detection and prevention of alternative behavioral strategies. Fractal analysis to assess the differentiation state of oligodendroglia in culture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1