Ludovic Gardy, Jonathan Curot, Luc Valton, Louis Berthier, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Christophe Hurter
{"title":"Detecting fast-ripples on both micro- and macro-electrodes in epilepsy: a wavelet-based CNN detector.","authors":"Ludovic Gardy, Jonathan Curot, Luc Valton, Louis Berthier, Emmanuel J Barbeau, Christophe Hurter","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast-ripples (FR) are short (~10 ms) high-frequency oscillations (HFO) between 200-600Hz that are helpful in epilepsy to identify the epileptogenic zone. Our aim is to propose a new method to detect FR that had to be efficient for intracerebral EEG (iEEG) recorded from both usual clinical macro-contacts (millimeter scale) and microwires (micrometer scale).</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>Step 1 of the detection method is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained using a large database of >11,000 FR recorded from the iEEG of 38 patients with epilepsy from both macro-contacts and microwires. The FR and non-FR events were fed to the CNN as normalized time-frequency maps. Step 2 is based on feature-based control techniques in order to reject false positives. In step 3, the human is reinstated in the decision-making process for final validation using a graphical user interface.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WALFRID achieved high performance on the realistically simulated data with sensitivity up to 99.95% and precision up to 96.51%. The detector was able to adapt to both macro and micro-EEG recordings. The real data was used without any pre-processing step such as artefact rejection. The precision of the automatic detection was of 57.5. Step 3 helped eliminating remaining false positives in a few minutes per subject.</p><p><strong>Comparison with existing methods: </strong>WALFRID performed as well or better than 6 other existing methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Since WALFRID was created to mimic the work-up of the neurologist, clinicians can easily use, understand, interpret and, if necessary, correct the output.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110350","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Fast-ripples (FR) are short (~10 ms) high-frequency oscillations (HFO) between 200-600Hz that are helpful in epilepsy to identify the epileptogenic zone. Our aim is to propose a new method to detect FR that had to be efficient for intracerebral EEG (iEEG) recorded from both usual clinical macro-contacts (millimeter scale) and microwires (micrometer scale).
New method: Step 1 of the detection method is based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained using a large database of >11,000 FR recorded from the iEEG of 38 patients with epilepsy from both macro-contacts and microwires. The FR and non-FR events were fed to the CNN as normalized time-frequency maps. Step 2 is based on feature-based control techniques in order to reject false positives. In step 3, the human is reinstated in the decision-making process for final validation using a graphical user interface.
Results: WALFRID achieved high performance on the realistically simulated data with sensitivity up to 99.95% and precision up to 96.51%. The detector was able to adapt to both macro and micro-EEG recordings. The real data was used without any pre-processing step such as artefact rejection. The precision of the automatic detection was of 57.5. Step 3 helped eliminating remaining false positives in a few minutes per subject.
Comparison with existing methods: WALFRID performed as well or better than 6 other existing methods.
Conclusion: Since WALFRID was created to mimic the work-up of the neurologist, clinicians can easily use, understand, interpret and, if necessary, correct the output.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.