Ophthalmological manifestations in a diverse pediatric population with Type I and Type II Stickler syndrome.

IF 4.4 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology. Retina Pub Date : 2024-12-13 DOI:10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.014
Andy Drackley, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Valerie Allegretti, Alexander Y Ing, Safa Rahmani, Michael P Blair, Michael J Shapiro, Brenda L Bohnsack, Jennifer L Rossen
{"title":"Ophthalmological manifestations in a diverse pediatric population with Type I and Type II Stickler syndrome.","authors":"Andy Drackley, Hantamalala Ralay Ranaivo, Valerie Allegretti, Alexander Y Ing, Safa Rahmani, Michael P Blair, Michael J Shapiro, Brenda L Bohnsack, Jennifer L Rossen","doi":"10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize and compare our cohorts of pediatric patients with type I and type II Sticker syndrome, with a focus on ophthalmological features.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Twenty-six patients (22 families) with clinical and genetic diagnoses of types I or II Stickler syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review of clinical notes and molecular diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Ophthalmic and systemic features and responses to laser treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohorts had an equal number of patients with COL2A1-related/Type I and COL11A1-related/Type II Stickler syndrome (n=13; 50%) and include 12 previously unpublished variants. Patients in Type I and II cohorts had similar average ages at presentation and length of follow-up. There were more self-identifying Hispanic patients among the Type II cohort compared to Type I (69% versus 39%, p = 0.145). Individuals with Type II on average had significantly higher myopia compared to those with Type I (p=0.008). Retinal detachment in at least one eye was diagnosed in 39% of the Type I cohort (7 eyes, 5 patients) and 46% of the Type II (7 eyes, 6 patients). Laser prophylaxis was utilized in 69% of patients with Type I and 85% with Type II. Unilateral retinal detachment following laser prophylaxis occurred in one patient with Type I and two with Type II. All identified COL2A1 variants in the Type I cohort are expected to cause disease through haploinsufficiency, and 92% of COL11A1 variants in the Type II cohort are presumed to be in-frame and exert a dominant negative effect, consistent with historical reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proportion of Types I and II Stickler syndrome are equal in our pediatric population, and patients self-identifying as Hispanic comprised the majority of Type II, supporting the need for additional study of possible under-detection of Type II in diverse populations. Our Type II cohort showed higher myopia and incidence of Pierre Robin sequence, and similar rates of retinal detachment and systemic manifestations compared to the Type I cohort. Our datasets provide important data regarding the safety and short-term effectiveness of laser prophylaxis, but larger and longer-term studies are needed, especially for those with Type II Stickler syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19501,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology. Retina","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology. Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2024.12.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize and compare our cohorts of pediatric patients with type I and type II Sticker syndrome, with a focus on ophthalmological features.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects: Twenty-six patients (22 families) with clinical and genetic diagnoses of types I or II Stickler syndrome.

Methods: Review of clinical notes and molecular diagnoses.

Main outcome measures: Ophthalmic and systemic features and responses to laser treatment.

Results: Our cohorts had an equal number of patients with COL2A1-related/Type I and COL11A1-related/Type II Stickler syndrome (n=13; 50%) and include 12 previously unpublished variants. Patients in Type I and II cohorts had similar average ages at presentation and length of follow-up. There were more self-identifying Hispanic patients among the Type II cohort compared to Type I (69% versus 39%, p = 0.145). Individuals with Type II on average had significantly higher myopia compared to those with Type I (p=0.008). Retinal detachment in at least one eye was diagnosed in 39% of the Type I cohort (7 eyes, 5 patients) and 46% of the Type II (7 eyes, 6 patients). Laser prophylaxis was utilized in 69% of patients with Type I and 85% with Type II. Unilateral retinal detachment following laser prophylaxis occurred in one patient with Type I and two with Type II. All identified COL2A1 variants in the Type I cohort are expected to cause disease through haploinsufficiency, and 92% of COL11A1 variants in the Type II cohort are presumed to be in-frame and exert a dominant negative effect, consistent with historical reporting.

Conclusions: The proportion of Types I and II Stickler syndrome are equal in our pediatric population, and patients self-identifying as Hispanic comprised the majority of Type II, supporting the need for additional study of possible under-detection of Type II in diverse populations. Our Type II cohort showed higher myopia and incidence of Pierre Robin sequence, and similar rates of retinal detachment and systemic manifestations compared to the Type I cohort. Our datasets provide important data regarding the safety and short-term effectiveness of laser prophylaxis, but larger and longer-term studies are needed, especially for those with Type II Stickler syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有 I 型和 II 型 Stickler 综合征的不同儿童的眼科表现。
目的比较 I 型和 II 型 Sticker 综合征儿科患者的特征,重点关注眼科特征:设计:回顾性队列研究:临床和基因诊断为 I 型或 II 型 Stickler 综合征的 26 名患者(22 个家庭):方法:回顾临床笔记和分子诊断:眼部和全身特征以及对激光治疗的反应:我们的队列中,COL2A1相关/I型和COL11A1相关/II型Stickler综合征患者的数量相同(n=13;50%),其中包括12个以前未发表的变异。I型和II型患者的平均发病年龄和随访时间相似。与 I 型相比,II 型组群中有更多自我认同的西班牙裔患者(69% 对 39%,P = 0.145)。与 I 型患者相比,II 型患者的平均近视度数明显更高(p=0.008)。I 型患者中有 39% (7 只眼睛,5 名患者)和 46% (7 只眼睛,6 名患者)至少有一只眼睛被诊断为视网膜脱离。69%的 I 型患者和 85% 的 II 型患者采用了激光预防措施。一名 I 型患者和两名 II 型患者在接受激光预防治疗后发生了单侧视网膜脱离。I型队列中所有已确定的COL2A1变体预计都会通过单倍体缺陷致病,II型队列中92%的COL11A1变体被推测为框架内变体,并产生显性负效应,这与历史报告一致:结论:在我们的儿科人群中,I型和II型Stickler综合征的比例相当,自认为是西班牙裔的患者占II型患者的大多数,这说明有必要对不同人群中可能存在的II型检出不足的情况进行更多研究。与 I 型人群相比,我们的 II 型人群显示出更高的近视率和皮埃尔-罗宾序列发病率,以及相似的视网膜脱离率和全身表现。我们的数据集提供了有关激光预防的安全性和短期有效性的重要数据,但还需要进行更大规模和更长期的研究,尤其是针对 II 型 Stickler 综合征患者的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology. Retina
Ophthalmology. Retina Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Outcomes and Need for Additional Interventions after Intravitreal Bevacizumab for Retinopathy of Prematurity. Endophthalmitis After Bilateral Same-Day vs Unilateral Intravitreal Injection. Impact of Duration of Exposure to Intraretinal Fluid on Visual Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Eroded Gore-Tex Scleral Sutures and Endophthalmitis in Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis. Foveal avascular zone enlargement correlates with visual acuity decline in patients with diabetic retinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1