COEPA ready: Innovative pedagogy for integrating social determinants of health in PharmD curricula.

IF 1.3 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning Pub Date : 2024-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102267
Jennifer Bhuiyan, Regina Arellano, Dana G Carroll, Christine Chim, Sharon Connor, Devra K Dang, Juanita A Draime, Tara P Driscoll, Lauren Jonkman, Abby A Kahaleh, Rakhi Karwa, Kristi W Kelley, Katie F Leslie, Brittney A Meyer, Nicole M Sifontis
{"title":"COEPA ready: Innovative pedagogy for integrating social determinants of health in PharmD curricula.","authors":"Jennifer Bhuiyan, Regina Arellano, Dana G Carroll, Christine Chim, Sharon Connor, Devra K Dang, Juanita A Draime, Tara P Driscoll, Lauren Jonkman, Abby A Kahaleh, Rakhi Karwa, Kristi W Kelley, Katie F Leslie, Brittney A Meyer, Nicole M Sifontis","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) recognize the need for social determinants of health (SDH) education for pharmacy learners. However, there is a dearth of published strategies for incorporating comprehensive SDH education in Doctor of Pharmacy curricula. The objectives of this study were to: 1) highlight unpublished exemplars of SDH teaching models and 2) propose strategies for teaching SDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to relevant AACP Special Interest Groups and Sections soliciting previously unpublished exemplars of SDH teaching models. The survey collected descriptions of the teaching model, relevant SDH domains as outlined in Healthy People 2030, and the level of influence on health outcomes according to the socioecological model. Deidentified survey submissions were analyzed and categorized by type (didactic, IPPE/APPE, or both), course type (elective or required), year taught, interprofessional education components (if applicable), innovation, assessment domains and tools, course structure, SDH domains, and the socioecological model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight programs submitted diverse exemplars of which six (75 %) were part of required didactic courses for P1-P3 learners. Teaching models included individual lectures and activities, didactic and experiential courses, and implementation of longitudinal curricular experiences. Seven (87.5 %) of the exemplars covered all five SDH domains, and seven (87.5 %) covered all levels of influence within the socioecological model. Exemplars featured simulations (50 %) and case-based learning activities (62.5 %). Three (37.5 %) featured interprofessional education and research components.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These exemplars provide faculty with varied models for implementing SDH-related teaching opportunities within their institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47501,"journal":{"name":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","volume":"17 2","pages":"102267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2024.102267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes and Entrustable Professional Activities (COEPA) recognize the need for social determinants of health (SDH) education for pharmacy learners. However, there is a dearth of published strategies for incorporating comprehensive SDH education in Doctor of Pharmacy curricula. The objectives of this study were to: 1) highlight unpublished exemplars of SDH teaching models and 2) propose strategies for teaching SDH.

Methods: A survey was distributed to relevant AACP Special Interest Groups and Sections soliciting previously unpublished exemplars of SDH teaching models. The survey collected descriptions of the teaching model, relevant SDH domains as outlined in Healthy People 2030, and the level of influence on health outcomes according to the socioecological model. Deidentified survey submissions were analyzed and categorized by type (didactic, IPPE/APPE, or both), course type (elective or required), year taught, interprofessional education components (if applicable), innovation, assessment domains and tools, course structure, SDH domains, and the socioecological model.

Results: Eight programs submitted diverse exemplars of which six (75 %) were part of required didactic courses for P1-P3 learners. Teaching models included individual lectures and activities, didactic and experiential courses, and implementation of longitudinal curricular experiences. Seven (87.5 %) of the exemplars covered all five SDH domains, and seven (87.5 %) covered all levels of influence within the socioecological model. Exemplars featured simulations (50 %) and case-based learning activities (62.5 %). Three (37.5 %) featured interprofessional education and research components.

Conclusion: These exemplars provide faculty with varied models for implementing SDH-related teaching opportunities within their institutions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COEPA 准备就绪:将健康的社会决定因素纳入药学博士课程的创新教学法。
背景:美国药学院课程成果和委托专业活动协会(COEPA)承认,有必要对药学学习者开展健康的社会决定因素(SDH)教育。然而,将全面的 SDH 教育纳入药学博士课程的策略却鲜有公布。本研究的目标是1) 强调未出版的 SDH 教学模式范例;2) 提出 SDH 教学策略:向相关的 AACP 小组和分会分发了一份调查问卷,征集之前未发表的 SDH 教学模式范例。调查收集了教学模式的描述、《2030 年健康人群》中列出的相关 SDH 领域,以及根据社会生态模式对健康结果的影响程度。对提交的去身份调查报告进行了分析,并按类型(授课式、IPPE/APPE 或两者兼有)、课程类型(选修或必修)、授课年份、跨专业教育内容(如适用)、创新、评估领域和工具、课程结构、SDH 领域和社会生态模型进行了分类:八项计划提交了不同的范例,其中六项(75%)是为小一至小三学生开设的必修教学课程的一部分。教学模式包括个人讲座和活动、说教式和体验式课程,以及实施纵向课程体验。七个范例(87.5%)涵盖了所有五个 SDH 领域,七个范例(87.5%)涵盖了社会生态模式中的所有影响层面。示范课程以模拟(50%)和基于案例的学习活动(62.5%)为特色。三个范例(37.5%)包含跨专业教育和研究内容:这些范例为教师提供了在其所在机构内实施与 SDH 相关的教学机会的各种模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
192
期刊最新文献
Editor's Note. Comparison of United States and Australian pharmacy student attitudes towards careers in geriatrics. A qualitative exploration of the interaction between mental illness stigma and preparedness for practice in pharmacy students. UPJE: Most pharmacy law educators have heard of it, but support remains divided. Current state of APPE-readiness assessments in schools or colleges of pharmacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1