{"title":"A Longitudinal Analysis Comparing the Mental Health of Children By Level of Young Carer Status.","authors":"Ed Janes, G J Melendez-Torres","doi":"10.1002/jad.12448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Young carers research has predominantly focused on the experiences of children who often provide substantial levels of care for family members, and the impacts of this caring on their lives. While quantitative studies of prevalence have increased, there have been increasing calls for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of young carers relative to children without caring responsibilities, to strengthen and challenge the existing evidence on impact.</p><p><strong>Methods/materials: </strong>The study utilized the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England: Next Steps (LSYPE), a cohort study of over 12,500 children aged 13 in 2004. The data set enabled the cross-sectional and longitudinal study of young carers mental health relative to those without caring responsibilities. A descriptive analysis produced separate prevalence estimates for the whole young carer spectrum and those with more substantial responsibilities, and assessed caring impact on individual mental health aspects. This was a precursor to the structural equation modelling (SEM) of their overall mental health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings highlighted the marginal or positive impacts of short-term caring responsibilities, but also how mental health deteriorated over time. Both the short-term benefits and long-term deterioration of mental health was of a higher magnitude for those with more substantial responsibilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis of the larger young carer spectrum highlighted a diversity of positive and negative outcomes. While this was partly due to the size of the caring roles, duration of time in the carer role was a key factor in problematic caring roles.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12448","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Young carers research has predominantly focused on the experiences of children who often provide substantial levels of care for family members, and the impacts of this caring on their lives. While quantitative studies of prevalence have increased, there have been increasing calls for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of young carers relative to children without caring responsibilities, to strengthen and challenge the existing evidence on impact.
Methods/materials: The study utilized the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England: Next Steps (LSYPE), a cohort study of over 12,500 children aged 13 in 2004. The data set enabled the cross-sectional and longitudinal study of young carers mental health relative to those without caring responsibilities. A descriptive analysis produced separate prevalence estimates for the whole young carer spectrum and those with more substantial responsibilities, and assessed caring impact on individual mental health aspects. This was a precursor to the structural equation modelling (SEM) of their overall mental health.
Results: The findings highlighted the marginal or positive impacts of short-term caring responsibilities, but also how mental health deteriorated over time. Both the short-term benefits and long-term deterioration of mental health was of a higher magnitude for those with more substantial responsibilities.
Conclusion: The analysis of the larger young carer spectrum highlighted a diversity of positive and negative outcomes. While this was partly due to the size of the caring roles, duration of time in the carer role was a key factor in problematic caring roles.
导言:对年轻照护者的研究主要集中在那些经常为家庭成员提供大量照护的儿童的经历,以及这种照护对他们生活的影响。虽然对发生率的定量研究有所增加,但人们越来越多地呼吁对年轻照护者与没有照护责任的儿童进行横截面和纵向研究,以加强和质疑现有的影响证据:本研究利用了 "英格兰年轻人纵向研究"(Longitudinal Study of Young People in England:方法/材料:该研究利用了 "英格兰青少年纵向研究:下一步"(LSYPE),这是一项针对 2004 年超过 12,500 名 13 岁儿童的队列研究。通过该数据集,可以对年轻照护者的心理健康与无照护责任者的心理健康进行横截面和纵向研究。通过描述性分析,对整个年轻照护者群体和承担更多责任的年轻照护者分别进行了患病率估计,并评估了照护对个人心理健康方面的影响。这是对他们的整体心理健康进行结构方程建模(SEM)的前奏:结果:研究结果强调了短期照料责任的边际或积极影响,以及心理健康随时间推移而恶化的情况。对于那些承担更多责任的人来说,心理健康的短期益处和长期恶化的程度都更大:对更大范围的年轻照护者的分析凸显了积极和消极结果的多样性。虽然这部分是由于照护角色的大小造成的,但在有问题的照护角色中,照护时间的长短是一个关键因素。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.