Impact of aetiology on short- and long-term outcomes in open descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivae203
Joshua R Chen, Christopher Pritting, Vishal N Shah, Colin King, Jacqueline McGee, Konstadinos A Plestis
{"title":"Impact of aetiology on short- and long-term outcomes in open descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.","authors":"Joshua R Chen, Christopher Pritting, Vishal N Shah, Colin King, Jacqueline McGee, Konstadinos A Plestis","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We analysed the impact of chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) and degenerative aneurysm (DA) on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing open descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained aortic database. From 1999 to 2023, 245 patients underwent open descending thoracic aortic aneurysm or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We compared preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications and operative and long-term mortality for patients with cTBAD (120 patients, 49%) and DA (125 patients, 51%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with cTBAD were significantly younger, more likely to be male and less likely to have comorbidities including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of operative mortality between cTBAD (7.5%) and DA patients (11.2%) (P = 0.44). Survival at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years for cTBAD versus DA patients was 90% versus 76%, 79% versus 59%, 59% versus 42% and 50% versus 29%, respectively (P < 0.01); however, this lost statistical significance in the Cox regression (P = 0.86). Following multivariable analysis, older age, female gender, coronary artery disease, urgent or emergent procedure and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications, operative deaths and long-term survival between cTBAD and DA patients.</p><p><strong>Irb number: </strong>(#20D.802), Obtained: 1/31/23.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We analysed the impact of chronic type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) and degenerative aneurysm (DA) on the short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing open descending thoracic aortic aneurysm and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained aortic database. From 1999 to 2023, 245 patients underwent open descending thoracic aortic aneurysm or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. We compared preoperative comorbidities, postoperative complications and operative and long-term mortality for patients with cTBAD (120 patients, 49%) and DA (125 patients, 51%).

Results: Patients with cTBAD were significantly younger, more likely to be male and less likely to have comorbidities including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of operative mortality between cTBAD (7.5%) and DA patients (11.2%) (P = 0.44). Survival at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years for cTBAD versus DA patients was 90% versus 76%, 79% versus 59%, 59% versus 42% and 50% versus 29%, respectively (P < 0.01); however, this lost statistical significance in the Cox regression (P = 0.86). Following multivariable analysis, older age, female gender, coronary artery disease, urgent or emergent procedure and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm were independent predictors of long-term outcomes.

Conclusions: There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications, operative deaths and long-term survival between cTBAD and DA patients.

Irb number: (#20D.802), Obtained: 1/31/23.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病因学对开放性降支和胸腹动脉瘤修复的短期和长期预后的影响。
目的:我们分析了慢性 B 型主动脉夹层(cTBAD)和退行性动脉瘤(DA)对开腹降主动脉瘤(DTA)和胸腹主动脉瘤(TAA)修复术患者短期和长期预后的影响:我们对前瞻性维护的主动脉数据库进行了回顾性分析。从 1999 年到 2023 年,共有 245 名患者接受了开放式 DTA 或 TAA 修复术。我们比较了慢性 B 型主动脉夹层(cTBAD)患者(120 例,49%)和退行性(DA)动脉瘤患者(125 例,51%)的术前合并症、术后并发症、手术死亡率和长期死亡率:结果:慢性 B 型主动脉夹层(cTBAD)患者明显更年轻,更可能是男性,更不可能患有糖尿病、慢性阻塞性肺病和冠状动脉疾病等合并症。cTBAD患者(7.5%)和DA患者(11.2%)的手术死亡率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.44)。cTBAD 和 DA 患者 1、5、10 和 15 年的存活率分别为 90% 对 76%、79% 对 59%、59% 对 42% 和 50% 对 29% (P 结论:cTBAD 和 DA 患者 1、5、10 和 15 年的存活率没有统计学差异:cTBAD 和 DA 患者的术后并发症和手术死亡发生率以及长期存活率在统计学上没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implantation of a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device via the right axillary artery in a patient with aberrant right subclavian artery. Pulmonary expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduits with a hand-sewn tricuspid valve. Do patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy benefit from off-pump coronary bypass surgery? (from the krok registry). Segmentectomy for non-peripheral and peripheral small-sized non-small cell lung cancer. Survival outcomes after surgery for type-a aortic dissection: a contemporary Dutch nationwide registry study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1