Kinga Kosiorowska, Marek Jasiński, Roman Przybylski, Marek Deja, Jan Rogowski, Witold Gerber, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Romuald Cichoń, Marek Cisowski, Wojciech Pawliszak, Paweł Bugajski, Michał Krejca, Tomasz Hirnle, Bartłomiej Perek, Zdzisław Tobota, Bohdan Maruszewski, Tomasz Hrapkowicz
{"title":"Do patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy benefit from off-pump coronary bypass surgery? (From the KROK registry).","authors":"Kinga Kosiorowska, Marek Jasiński, Roman Przybylski, Marek Deja, Jan Rogowski, Witold Gerber, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Romuald Cichoń, Marek Cisowski, Wojciech Pawliszak, Paweł Bugajski, Michał Krejca, Tomasz Hirnle, Bartłomiej Perek, Zdzisław Tobota, Bohdan Maruszewski, Tomasz Hrapkowicz","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who had a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤35%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database, encompassing patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Poland between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: on-pump and off-pump. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality following surgical revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9920 patients were included, with 3116 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The median follow-up period was 4 years. The off-pump group was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (6.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.002) and fewer perioperative complications. However, long-term survival analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant advantage for on-pump group at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Off-pump provides short-term benefits, including reduced early mortality and fewer complications compared to on-pump technique. However, these advantages do not translate into improved long-term survival, where on-pump demonstrates a slight benefit. The choice between off-pump and on-pump technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who had a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤35%.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database, encompassing patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Poland between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: on-pump and off-pump. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality following surgical revascularization.
Results: A total of 9920 patients were included, with 3116 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The median follow-up period was 4 years. The off-pump group was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (6.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.002) and fewer perioperative complications. However, long-term survival analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant advantage for on-pump group at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.047).
Conclusions: Off-pump provides short-term benefits, including reduced early mortality and fewer complications compared to on-pump technique. However, these advantages do not translate into improved long-term survival, where on-pump demonstrates a slight benefit. The choice between off-pump and on-pump technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.
目的:本研究旨在比较左心室射血分数≤35%的缺血性心肌病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的围手术期结果和长期死亡率。方法:回顾性队列分析使用波兰国家心脏手术程序登记处(KROK)数据库的数据,包括2012年至2022年在波兰接受孤立冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。患者分为两组:有泵和无泵。倾向得分匹配用于平衡组。主要结局是手术血运重建术后的长期全因死亡率。结果:共纳入9920例患者,经倾向评分匹配后,每组3116例。中位随访期为4年。停泵组30天死亡率较低(6.4% vs 9.1%, p = 0.002),围手术期并发症较少。然而,长期生存分析显示,在10年随访中,非泵组有适度但有统计学意义的优势(p = 0.047)。结论:与有泵技术相比,无泵技术具有短期效益,包括降低早期死亡率和减少并发症。然而,这些优势并不能转化为长期生存能力的提高,在长期生存能力方面,无泵泵的优势并不明显。停泵和开泵技术之间的选择应根据患者的具体因素和外科专业知识进行个性化选择。