Do patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy benefit from off-pump coronary bypass surgery? (From the KROK registry).

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1093/icvts/ivaf014
Kinga Kosiorowska, Marek Jasiński, Roman Przybylski, Marek Deja, Jan Rogowski, Witold Gerber, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Romuald Cichoń, Marek Cisowski, Wojciech Pawliszak, Paweł Bugajski, Michał Krejca, Tomasz Hirnle, Bartłomiej Perek, Zdzisław Tobota, Bohdan Maruszewski, Tomasz Hrapkowicz
{"title":"Do patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy benefit from off-pump coronary bypass surgery? (From the KROK registry).","authors":"Kinga Kosiorowska, Marek Jasiński, Roman Przybylski, Marek Deja, Jan Rogowski, Witold Gerber, Jerzy Pacholewicz, Romuald Cichoń, Marek Cisowski, Wojciech Pawliszak, Paweł Bugajski, Michał Krejca, Tomasz Hirnle, Bartłomiej Perek, Zdzisław Tobota, Bohdan Maruszewski, Tomasz Hrapkowicz","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who had a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤35%.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database, encompassing patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Poland between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: on-pump and off-pump. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality following surgical revascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9920 patients were included, with 3116 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The median follow-up period was 4 years. The off-pump group was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (6.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.002) and fewer perioperative complications. However, long-term survival analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant advantage for on-pump group at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Off-pump provides short-term benefits, including reduced early mortality and fewer complications compared to on-pump technique. However, these advantages do not translate into improved long-term survival, where on-pump demonstrates a slight benefit. The choice between off-pump and on-pump technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11890277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivaf014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy who had a left ventricle ejection fraction of ≤35%.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using data from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database, encompassing patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in Poland between 2012 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: on-pump and off-pump. Propensity score matching was used to balance the groups. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality following surgical revascularization.

Results: A total of 9920 patients were included, with 3116 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The median follow-up period was 4 years. The off-pump group was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate (6.4% vs 9.1%, P = 0.002) and fewer perioperative complications. However, long-term survival analysis revealed a modest but statistically significant advantage for on-pump group at the 10-year follow-up (P = 0.047).

Conclusions: Off-pump provides short-term benefits, including reduced early mortality and fewer complications compared to on-pump technique. However, these advantages do not translate into improved long-term survival, where on-pump demonstrates a slight benefit. The choice between off-pump and on-pump technique should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and surgical expertise.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缺血性心肌病患者能从非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥手术中获益吗?(从krok登记处)。
目的:本研究旨在比较左心室射血分数≤35%的缺血性心肌病患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的围手术期结果和长期死亡率。方法:回顾性队列分析使用波兰国家心脏手术程序登记处(KROK)数据库的数据,包括2012年至2022年在波兰接受孤立冠状动脉搭桥术的患者。患者分为两组:有泵和无泵。倾向得分匹配用于平衡组。主要结局是手术血运重建术后的长期全因死亡率。结果:共纳入9920例患者,经倾向评分匹配后,每组3116例。中位随访期为4年。停泵组30天死亡率较低(6.4% vs 9.1%, p = 0.002),围手术期并发症较少。然而,长期生存分析显示,在10年随访中,非泵组有适度但有统计学意义的优势(p = 0.047)。结论:与有泵技术相比,无泵技术具有短期效益,包括降低早期死亡率和减少并发症。然而,这些优势并不能转化为长期生存能力的提高,在长期生存能力方面,无泵泵的优势并不明显。停泵和开泵技术之间的选择应根据患者的具体因素和外科专业知识进行个性化选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of diagonal branch angle on cardiac outcomes after sequential coronary bypass surgery. Total aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique: Influence of aortic arch anomalies. Evaluation of a novel multielectrode surgical Pulsed Field Ablation clamp: An ex-vivo vegetal study. Reply to Bayici et al. Surgical repair of supracristal ventricular septal defect with combined multivalvular disease in an elderly patient: A transaortic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1