Agreement Between Office-Based and Laboratory-Based Globorisk Models and their Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases in Turkish Population: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Neslişah Türe, Ahmet Naci Emecen, Belgin Ünal
{"title":"Agreement Between Office-Based and Laboratory-Based Globorisk Models and their Prediction of Cardiovascular Diseases in Turkish Population: A Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Neslişah Türe, Ahmet Naci Emecen, Belgin Ünal","doi":"10.1007/s10935-024-00819-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globorisk is a country-specific risk prediction model that estimates 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between different versions of Globorisk and their ability to predict CVD in a nationwide Turkish cohort. Baseline data from 5449 participants aged 40-74 were obtained from Türkiye Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Survey 2011. Office- and laboratory-based Globorisk risk scores were calculated using age, gender, systolic blood pressure (SBP), current smoking status, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and total cholesterol levels. Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess the agreement between 10-year risk scores. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated with Globorisk variables to predict the presence of CVD over a 6-year follow-up period. Model calibration was performed. The study identified 515 incident CVD cases during the 6-year follow-up period. There was a strong positive correlation between 10-year Globorisk versions (r = 0.89). The limit of the agreement was narrower in males (- 6.11 to 6.89%) compared to females (- 7.01 to 7.73%). Age and systolic blood pressure were associated with 6-year CVD in both office- and laboratory-based models. The models showed similar discriminative performance (AUC: 0.68) and predictive accuracy (mean absolute error: 0.009) for 6-year CVD. Both Globorisk models were strongly correlated, had similar discrimination power and predictive accuracy. The office-based Globorisk can be used instead of the laboratory-based model, especially where resources are limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-024-00819-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globorisk is a country-specific risk prediction model that estimates 10-year cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. This study aims to evaluate the agreement between different versions of Globorisk and their ability to predict CVD in a nationwide Turkish cohort. Baseline data from 5449 participants aged 40-74 were obtained from Türkiye Chronic Diseases and Risk Factors Survey 2011. Office- and laboratory-based Globorisk risk scores were calculated using age, gender, systolic blood pressure (SBP), current smoking status, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and total cholesterol levels. Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were employed to assess the agreement between 10-year risk scores. Multivariable logistic regression models were estimated with Globorisk variables to predict the presence of CVD over a 6-year follow-up period. Model calibration was performed. The study identified 515 incident CVD cases during the 6-year follow-up period. There was a strong positive correlation between 10-year Globorisk versions (r = 0.89). The limit of the agreement was narrower in males (- 6.11 to 6.89%) compared to females (- 7.01 to 7.73%). Age and systolic blood pressure were associated with 6-year CVD in both office- and laboratory-based models. The models showed similar discriminative performance (AUC: 0.68) and predictive accuracy (mean absolute error: 0.009) for 6-year CVD. Both Globorisk models were strongly correlated, had similar discrimination power and predictive accuracy. The office-based Globorisk can be used instead of the laboratory-based model, especially where resources are limited.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于办公室的 Globorisk 模型与基于实验室的 Globorisk 模型之间的一致性及其对土耳其人口心血管疾病的预测:全国队列研究
Globorisk 是一个针对特定国家的风险预测模型,用于估算 10 年心血管疾病(CVD)风险。本研究旨在评估不同版本的 Globorisk 之间的一致性及其在土耳其全国性队列中预测心血管疾病的能力。研究人员从 2011 年土耳其慢性病和危险因素调查中获得了 5449 名 40-74 岁参与者的基线数据。利用年龄、性别、收缩压 (SBP)、当前吸烟状况、体重指数 (BMI)、糖尿病和总胆固醇水平计算了基于办公室和实验室的 Globorisk 风险评分。采用相关性分析和布兰-阿尔特曼分析评估 10 年风险评分之间的一致性。利用 Globorisk 变量估算了多变量逻辑回归模型,以预测 6 年随访期内是否存在心血管疾病。对模型进行了校准。研究确定了 6 年随访期内 515 例心血管疾病病例。10 年 Globorisk 版本之间存在很强的正相关性(r = 0.89)。与女性(- 7.01% 到 7.73%)相比,男性的一致性界限较窄(- 6.11% 到 6.89%)。在诊室模型和实验室模型中,年龄和收缩压都与 6 年心血管疾病相关。这些模型对 6 年心血管疾病的判别性能(AUC:0.68)和预测准确性(平均绝对误差:0.009)相似。两种 Globorisk 模型都有很强的相关性,具有相似的判别能力和预测准确性。可以使用基于诊室的 Globorisk 代替基于实验室的模型,尤其是在资源有限的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
School Suspension as a Predictor of Young Adult Homelessness: The International Youth Development Study. The Association Between Intimate Partner Encouragement of Alcohol Use and Alcohol Use Among Females Formerly Involved in the Juvenile Justice System. Nudging Hospital Visitors Towards Stair Use, in Greece. Screen Time Soars and Vision Suffers: How School Closures During the Pandemic Affected Children and Adolescents' Eyesight. The Burden of Chronic Diseases with the Status of Family Medical History Among Older Adults in India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1