Fractures complicating intraosseous access in pediatric patients – A systematic review

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.112034
Megan Williams , Samira Mehdi , Lauren Tristani , Dina El Demellawy , Youssef Nasr
{"title":"Fractures complicating intraosseous access in pediatric patients – A systematic review","authors":"Megan Williams ,&nbsp;Samira Mehdi ,&nbsp;Lauren Tristani ,&nbsp;Dina El Demellawy ,&nbsp;Youssef Nasr","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.112034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Intraosseous (IO) access is a commonly used procedure in pediatric emergencies for establishingvascular access when alternative means, such as intravenous access, cannot be obtained. Likealternative routes, IO can be administered quickly and provides a route for medications, blood products,and fluids to be infused in emergency circumstances. While the use of IO is generally considered safewith minimal risks, potential complications can include compartment syndrome, infection, thrombosis, and fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed across various academicdatabases. Search parameters were restricted to exclude articles that where; non-English, non-full text,and not published between 1922 and 2022. Articles were included in analysis if they included patients from 0 to 18 and reported on both the patient outcomes and the procedural information.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following data synthesis (<em>n</em> = 27 articles [<em>n</em> = 1339 cases]), it was observed that the EZ-IO needle was thepredominant choice of access, accounting for 69.7 % of cases. The tibia emerged as the most frequentlyselected insertion site, utilized in 97 % of instances. Among the 226 cases that reported on laterality, a nearly equal distribution between left (114) and right (112) sides were observed. Most IO attempts were successful in accessing vascular access upon first attempt. There were 23 cases that required a second attempt to achieve access, and 4 cases necessitating 3 or more attempts. Within 1339 participants, a complication was reported in 105 cases, producing a complication rate of 7.8 %. Of those 105 complications, fracture occurred 7 times (6.67 %). When specifically isolating fracture as a complication resulting IO access, only 7 cases were reported, indicating an occurrence rate of 0.52 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This review supports the rarity of fracture as a complication following the use of an IO needle in pediatric age group, emphasizing the need for additional research to elucidate the underlying risk factors associated with fracture in these cases. Additionally, it underscores the importance of conducting further pathological investigations to gain insight into bone histology that may be indicative of IO access and/or fracture occurrence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 2","pages":"Article 112034"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324007782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Intraosseous (IO) access is a commonly used procedure in pediatric emergencies for establishingvascular access when alternative means, such as intravenous access, cannot be obtained. Likealternative routes, IO can be administered quickly and provides a route for medications, blood products,and fluids to be infused in emergency circumstances. While the use of IO is generally considered safewith minimal risks, potential complications can include compartment syndrome, infection, thrombosis, and fracture.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed across various academicdatabases. Search parameters were restricted to exclude articles that where; non-English, non-full text,and not published between 1922 and 2022. Articles were included in analysis if they included patients from 0 to 18 and reported on both the patient outcomes and the procedural information.

Results

Following data synthesis (n = 27 articles [n = 1339 cases]), it was observed that the EZ-IO needle was thepredominant choice of access, accounting for 69.7 % of cases. The tibia emerged as the most frequentlyselected insertion site, utilized in 97 % of instances. Among the 226 cases that reported on laterality, a nearly equal distribution between left (114) and right (112) sides were observed. Most IO attempts were successful in accessing vascular access upon first attempt. There were 23 cases that required a second attempt to achieve access, and 4 cases necessitating 3 or more attempts. Within 1339 participants, a complication was reported in 105 cases, producing a complication rate of 7.8 %. Of those 105 complications, fracture occurred 7 times (6.67 %). When specifically isolating fracture as a complication resulting IO access, only 7 cases were reported, indicating an occurrence rate of 0.52 %.

Conclusion

This review supports the rarity of fracture as a complication following the use of an IO needle in pediatric age group, emphasizing the need for additional research to elucidate the underlying risk factors associated with fracture in these cases. Additionally, it underscores the importance of conducting further pathological investigations to gain insight into bone histology that may be indicative of IO access and/or fracture occurrence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科患者骨内通路并发骨折 - 系统综述。
简介:骨内(IO)通路是儿科急诊中常用的一种方法,用于在无法获得其他方法(如静脉内通路)时建立血管通路。与其他途径一样,IO可以快速给药,并在紧急情况下提供药物、血液制品和液体输注的途径。虽然通常认为使用IO是安全的,风险最小,但潜在的并发症可能包括筋膜室综合征、感染、血栓形成和骨折。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,在各种学术数据库中进行全面搜索。搜索参数被限制为排除以下条目:非英文,非全文,在1922年至2022年间未出版。如果文章包括0 - 18岁的患者,并且报告了患者的结果和手术信息,则纳入分析。结果:综合资料(n = 27篇[n = 1339例]),EZ-IO针是主要的获取方式,占69.7%。胫骨是最常选择的植入部位,97%的病例使用了胫骨。在226例报告侧侧性的病例中,观察到左侧(114)和右侧(112)的分布几乎相等。大多数IO尝试在第一次尝试时成功进入血管通道。有23例需要第二次尝试才能进入,4例需要3次或更多次尝试。在1339名参与者中,105例出现并发症,并发症发生率为7.8%。105例并发症中骨折7例(6.67%)。当专门隔离骨折作为导致IO通路的并发症时,仅报告了7例,发生率为0.52%。结论:本综述支持在儿童年龄组使用IO针后骨折作为并发症的罕见性,强调需要进一步的研究来阐明这些病例中与骨折相关的潜在危险因素。此外,该研究还强调了进行进一步病理调查以深入了解骨组织学的重要性,这些组织学可能指示IO通路和/或骨折的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, and national burdens of road injuries from 1990 to 2021: Findings from the 2021 Global Burden of Disease Study Prevalence and predictors of bone mineral density testing after distal radius fracture in menopausal women Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increase time to operating room without increasing postoperative hematologic complications in patients with fragility fractures of the proximal femur Cefazolin vs. alternative beta-lactams for prophylaxis in lower extremity fracture surgery: A target trial emulation Incidence of venous thromboembolism following achilles tendon rupture. Data from the UK foot and ankle thrombo-embolism (UK-FATE) audit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1