A systematic review of the experience of treatment burden of digital health for military personnel in primary healthcare.

Health open research Pub Date : 2024-03-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1
Paul Erhahiemen, Catherine A O'Donnell, Katie Gallacher, Barbara I Nicholl
{"title":"A systematic review of the experience of treatment burden of digital health for military personnel in primary healthcare.","authors":"Paul Erhahiemen, Catherine A O'Donnell, Katie Gallacher, Barbara I Nicholl","doi":"10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital Health (DH) integrates digital technologies into healthcare to increase efficiency and improve patient experiences, benefiting both primary care and military healthcare systems. However, it raises concerns about the potential shift of healthcare responsibilities onto patients, creating workloads or treatment burdens that affect care, adherence, equity, and resource allocation. It is critical to assess this in the military context to enhance patient-centred care and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand military personnel's experience of treatment burden of DH in primary care, to understand the barriers and facilitators of the use of DH, and to map barriers identified to the Burden of Treatment Theory (BOTT).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic literature review. MEDLINE, Psych INFO, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar will be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen papers using inclusion and exclusion criteria, with conflicts decided by a third reviewer. Any retrieved study that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be quality appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The findings will be analysed using thematic synthesis and evaluated in the context of the Burden of Treatment Theory. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA) guidelines have been adhered to in the production of this protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Understanding the experience of treatment burden whilst using DH in the military has the potential to influence health policy, the commissioning of services and interventions, and most importantly, improve patient experience and health outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023494297.</p>","PeriodicalId":520340,"journal":{"name":"Health open research","volume":"6 ","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/healthopenres.13599.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital Health (DH) integrates digital technologies into healthcare to increase efficiency and improve patient experiences, benefiting both primary care and military healthcare systems. However, it raises concerns about the potential shift of healthcare responsibilities onto patients, creating workloads or treatment burdens that affect care, adherence, equity, and resource allocation. It is critical to assess this in the military context to enhance patient-centred care and outcomes.

Objective: To understand military personnel's experience of treatment burden of DH in primary care, to understand the barriers and facilitators of the use of DH, and to map barriers identified to the Burden of Treatment Theory (BOTT).

Design: A systematic literature review. MEDLINE, Psych INFO, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Google Scholar will be searched. Two independent reviewers will screen papers using inclusion and exclusion criteria, with conflicts decided by a third reviewer. Any retrieved study that meets the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be quality appraised using the appropriate Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. The findings will be analysed using thematic synthesis and evaluated in the context of the Burden of Treatment Theory. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol (PRISMA) guidelines have been adhered to in the production of this protocol.

Conclusions: Understanding the experience of treatment burden whilst using DH in the military has the potential to influence health policy, the commissioning of services and interventions, and most importantly, improve patient experience and health outcomes. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023494297.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对基层医疗机构中军人数字健康治疗负担经验的系统性回顾。
背景:数字医疗(DH)将数字技术整合到医疗保健中,以提高效率和改善患者体验,使初级保健和军事医疗保健系统都能从中受益。然而,它也引发了人们对医疗保健责任可能转移到患者身上的担忧,因为这会造成工作量或治疗负担,影响护理、依从性、公平性和资源分配。在军事背景下对这一问题进行评估对于提高以患者为中心的医疗服务和医疗效果至关重要:目的:了解军人在初级保健中对 DH 治疗负担的体验,了解使用 DH 的障碍和促进因素,并将发现的障碍与治疗负担理论 (BOTT) 相结合:设计:系统性文献回顾。将检索 MEDLINE、Psych INFO、EMBASE 和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) 以及 Google Scholar。两名独立审稿人将使用纳入和排除标准筛选论文,由第三名审稿人决定是否存在冲突。对于检索到的符合纳入和排除标准的研究,将使用相应的 "批判性评估技能计划"(CASP)核对表进行质量评估。研究结果将采用专题综合法进行分析,并根据治疗负担理论进行评估。在制定本方案时,我们遵守了《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目协议》(PRISMA)指南:了解军队中使用 DH 时的治疗负担经验有可能对卫生政策、服务和干预措施的委托产生影响,最重要的是可以改善患者的体验和健康结果。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023494297。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the experience of treatment burden of digital health for military personnel in primary healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1