Emma Kaeli, Zhelong Jiang, Xiaomian Yang, Emma Patricia Kwai Lin Choy, Nicolas Bojun Liang, Edward Barks, Sunny Wang, Stephen Dongmin Kang, William C. Chueh
{"title":"Decoupling First-Cycle Capacity Loss Mechanisms in Sulfide Solid-State Batteries","authors":"Emma Kaeli, Zhelong Jiang, Xiaomian Yang, Emma Patricia Kwai Lin Choy, Nicolas Bojun Liang, Edward Barks, Sunny Wang, Stephen Dongmin Kang, William C. Chueh","doi":"10.1039/d4ee04908j","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and <em>operando</em> X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li<small><sub>6</sub></small>PS<small><sub>5</sub></small>Cl SE, Li(Ni<small><sub>0.5</sub></small>Mn<small><sub>0.3</sub></small>Co<small><sub>0.2</sub></small>)O<small><sub>2</sub></small> (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li<small><sup>+</sup></small>) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA g<small><sub>NMC</sub></small><small><sup>-1</sup></small>) cycling paired with > 100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. Through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for an accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":32.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ee04908j","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Solid-state batteries (SSBs) promise more energy-dense storage than liquid electrolyte lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, first-cycle capacity loss is higher in SSBs than in LIBs due to interfacial reactions. The chemical evolution of key interfaces in SSBs has been extensively characterized. Electrochemically, however, we lack a versatile strategy for quantifying the reversibility of solid electrolyte (SE) redox for established and next-generation SSB electrolytes. In this work, we perform tailored electrochemical tests and operando X-ray diffraction to disentangle reversible and irreversible sources of capacity loss in positive electrodes composed of Li6PS5Cl SE, Li(Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2)O2 (NMC), and carbon conductive additives. We leverage an atypically low voltage cutoff (2.0 V vs. Li/Li+) to quantify the reversibility of SE redox. Using slow (5.5 mA gNMC-1) cycling paired with > 100 h low-voltage holds, our cells achieve a surprising 96.2% first-cycle Coulombic efficiency, which is higher than previously reported (mean: 72%, maximum: 91.6% across surveyed literature). We clarify that sluggish NMC relithiation kinetics have been historically mistaken for permanently irreversible capacity loss. Through systematic decoupling of loss mechanisms, we uncover the unexpected reversibility of SE redox and isolate the major contributors to capacity loss, outlining a strategy for an accurate assessment of next-generation SE materials and interface modifications.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).